Cost comparison of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device and stent-assisted coiling

Neurosurgery

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 944-949

  Colby, Geoffrey P ^a   Lin, Li Mei ^a   Paul, Alexandra R ^b   Huang, Judy ^a   Tamargo, Rafael J ^a   Coon, Alexander L ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneurysm; Coiling; Cost; Endovascular; Pipeline embolization device

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY ANEURYSM; ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; CATHETER; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COIL EMBOLIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; EMBOLIZATION COIL; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY ANEURYSM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENT; STENT ASSISTED COILING; VASCULAR ACCESS;

BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84868195492     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182690b8b     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andaluz N, Zuccarello M. Recent trends in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: analysis of a nationwide inpatient database. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(6):1163-1169.
2. Higashida RT, Lahue BJ, Torbey MT, Hopkins LN, Leip E, Hanley DF. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(1):146-151.
3. Smith GA, Dagostino P, Maltenfort MG, Dumont AS, Ratliff JK. Geographic variation and regional trends in adoption of endovascular techniques for cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(6):1768-1777.
4. Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach, part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(1):8-14.
5. Arthur AS, Wilson SA, Dixit S, Barr JD. Hydrogel-coated coils for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18(2):E1.
6. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Tong FC, Goldstein JH, Dion JE. Use of three-dimensional Guglielmi detachable coils in the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(7):1312-1314.
7. Colby GP, Paul AR, Radvany MG, et al. A single center comparison of coiling versus stent assisted coiling in 90 consecutive paraophthalmic region aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4(2):116-120.
8. Higashida RT, Smith W, Gress D, et al. Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery: case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(6):944-949.
9. Mocco J, Snyder KV, Albuquerque FC, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Enterprise stent: a multicenter registry. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(1):35-39.
10. Howington JU, Hanel RA, Harrigan MR, Levy EI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. The Neuroform stent, the first microcatheter-delivered stent for use in the intracranial circulation. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(1):2-5.
11. Aletich VA, Debrun GM, Misra M, Charbel F, Ausman JI. The remodeling technique of balloon-assisted Guglielmi detachable coil placement in wide-necked aneurysms: experience at the University of Illinois at Chicago. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93(3):388-396.
12. Hoh BL, Chi YY, Dermott MA, Lipori PJ, Lewis SB. The effect of coiling versus clipping of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms on length of stay, hospital cost, hospital reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement at the University of Florida. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(4):614-619; discussion 619-621.
13. Halkes PH, Wermer MJ, Rinkel GJ, Buskens E. Direct costs of surgical clipping and endovascular coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(1):40-45.
14. Maud A, Lakshminarayan K, Suri MF, Vazquez G, Lanzino G, Qureshi AI. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(5): 880-886.
15. Zubair Tahir M, Enam SA, Pervez Ali R, Bhatti A, ul Haq T. Cost-effectiveness of clipping vs coiling of intracranial aneurysms after subarachnoid hemorrhage in a developing country: a prospective study. Surg Neurol. 2009;72(4):355-360; discussion 360-361.
16. Simon SD, Reig AS, James RF, Reddy P, Mericle RA. Relative cost comparison of embolic materials used for treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2(2):163-167.
17. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(4):632-642.
18. Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(6): 1139-1147.
19. McAuliffe W, Wycoco V, Rice H, Phatouros C, Singh TJ, Wenderoth J. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(1):164-170.
20. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(1):34-40.
21. Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, et al. Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2009;1(1):56-65.
22. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1115-1120.
23. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Pipeline embolization device PMA P100018: summary of safety and effectiveness data. http://www.accessdata.fda. gov/cdrh-docs/pdf10/P100018b.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2012.
24. Colby GP, Lin LM, Gomez JF, et al. Immediate procedural outcomes in 35 consecutive Pipeline embolization cases: a single-center, single-user experience [published online ahead of print March 29, 2012]. J Neurointerv Surg.
25. Cloft HJ. Coils and cash: what coil vendors don't want you to know. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(7):1276-1277.
26. Huang MC, Baaj AA, Downes K, et al. Paradoxical trends in the management of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the United States: analysis of nationwide database over a 10-year period. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1730-1735.
27. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003; 34(6):1398-1403.
28. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, McDougall CG. Usefulness of the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3-6-mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(6):1191-1201.
29. Piotin M, Blanc R, Spelle L, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41 (1):110-115.
30. Sedat J, Chau Y, Mondot L, Vargas J, Szapiro J, Lonjon M. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms with stenting (Neuroform) and coiling: mid-term and long-term results. Neuroradiology. 2009;51(6):401-409.