Distinct requirements for intra-ER sorting and budding of peroxisomal membrane proteins from the ER

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 212, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 335-348

  Agrawal, Gaurav ^a   Fassas, Scott N ^a   Xia, Zhi Jie ^a   Subramani, Suresh ^a  

^a SECTION OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PEROXIN 10; PEROXIN 12; PEROXIN 19; PEROXIN 2; PEROXIN 3; RING FINGER PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; FUNGAL PROTEIN; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING;

ARTICLE; CELL FRACTIONATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; NONHUMAN; PEROXISOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RING FINGER MOTIF; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PICHIA; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; TIME FACTOR;

ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; FUNGAL PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PEROXISOMES; PICHIA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84959453936     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201506141     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agrawal, G., and S. Subramani. 2013. Emerging role of the endoplasmic reticulum in peroxisome biogenesis. Front. Physiol. 4:286. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00286
2. Agrawal, G., and S. Subramani. 2015. De novo peroxisome biogenesis: Evolving concepts and conundrums. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.09.014
3. Agrawal, G., S. Joshi, and S. Subramani. 2011. Cell-free sorting of peroxisomal membrane proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:9113-9118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018749108
4. Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
5. Burnett, S.F., J.-C. Farré, T.Y. Nazarko, and S. Subramani. 2015. Peroxisomal Pex3 activates selective autophagy of peroxisomes via interaction with the pexophagy receptor Atg30. J. Biol. Chem. 290:8623-8631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M114.619338
6. Faber, K.N., J.A. Heyman, and S. Subramani. 1998. Two AAA family peroxins, PpPex1p and PpPex6p, interact with each other in an ATP-dependent manner and are associated with different subcellular membranous structures distinct from peroxisomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:936-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.18.2.936
7. Fakieh, M.H., P.J.M. Drake, J. Lacey, J.M. Munck, A.M. Motley, and E.H. Hettema. 2013. Intra-ER sorting of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 relies on its luminal domain. Biol. Open. 2:829-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.20134788
8. Fang, Y., J.C. Morrell, J.M. Jones, and S.J. Gould. 2004. PEX3 functions as a PEX19 docking factor in the import of class I peroxisomal membrane proteins. J. Cell Biol. 164:863-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200311131
9. Farré, J.-C., R. Manjithaya, R.D. Mathewson, and S. Subramani. 2008. PpAtg30 tags peroxisomes for turnover by selective autophagy. Dev. Cell. 14:365-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.011
10. Fransen, M., I. Vastiau, C. Brees, V. Brys, G.P. Mannaerts, and P.P. Van Veldhoven. 2005. Analysis of human Pex19p's domain structure by pentapeptide scanning mutagenesis. J. Mol. Biol. 346:1275-1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.013
11. Fujiki, Y., K. Okumoto, S. Mukai, M. Honsho, and S. Tamura. 2014. Peroxisome biogenesis in mammalian cells. Front. Physiol. 5:307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00307
12. Groesch, M.E., G. Rossi, and S. Ferro-Novick. 1992. Reconstitution of endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport in yeast: In vitro assay to characterize secretory mutants and functional transport vesicles. Methods Enzymol. 219:137-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(92)19016-Y
13. Hazra, P.P., I. Suriapranata, W.B. Snyder, and S. Subramani. 2002. Peroxisome remnants in pex3delta cells and the requirement of Pex3p for interactions between the peroxisomal docking and translocation subcomplexes. Traffic. 3:560-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30806.x
14. Hoepfner, D., D. Schildknegt, I. Braakman, P. Philippsen, and H.F. Tabak. 2005. Contribution of the endoplasmic reticulum to peroxisome formation. Cell. 122:85-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.025
15. Kalel, V.C., W. Schliebs, and R. Erdmann. 2015. Identification and functional characterization of Trypanosoma brucei peroxin 16. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1853(10, 10 Pt A):2326-2337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.05.024
16. Kashiwayama, Y., K. Asahina, H. Shibata, M. Morita, A.C. Muntau, A.A. Roscher, R.J.A. Wanders, N. Shimozawa, M. Sakaguchi, H. Kato, and T. Imanaka. 2005. Role of Pex19p in the targeting of PMP70 to peroxisome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1746:116-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.10.006
17. Kim, P.K., and E.H. Hettema. 2015. Multiple pathways for protein transport to peroxisomes. J. Mol. Biol. 427(6, 6 Pt A):1176-1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.005
18. Kim, P.K., R.T. Mullen, U. Schumann, and J. Lippincott-Schwartz. 2006. The origin and maintenance of mammalian peroxisomes involves a de novo PEX16-dependent pathway from the ER. J. Cell Biol. 173:521-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200601036
19. Knoblach, B., and R.A. Rachubinski. 2015. Sharing the cell's bounty-organelle inheritance in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 128:621-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.151423
20. Lam, S.K., N. Yoda, and R. Schekman. 2010. A vesicle carrier that mediates peroxisome protein traffic from the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:21523-21528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013397107
21. Lazarow, P.B.P. 1989. Peroxisome biogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1:630-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0955-0674(89)90026-4
22. Lazarow, P.B., and Y. Fujiki. 1985. Biogenesis of peroxisomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1:489-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.002421
23. Motley, A.M., J.M. Nuttall, and E.H. Hettema. 2012. Pex3-anchored Atg36 tags peroxisomes for degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 31:2852-2868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.151
24. Sato, Y., H. Shibata, T. Nakatsu, H. Nakano, Y. Kashiwayama, T. Imanaka, and H. Kato. 2010. Structural basis for docking of peroxisomal membrane protein carrier Pex19p onto its receptor Pex3p. EMBO J. 29:4083-4093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.293
25. Schueller, N., S.J. Holton, K. Fodor, M. Milewski, P. Konarev, W.A. Stanley, J. Wolf, R. Erdmann, W. Schliebs, Y.H. Song, and M. Wilmanns. 2010. The peroxisomal receptor Pex19p forms a helical mPTS recognition domain. EMBO J. 29:2491-2500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.115
26. Shibata, H., Y. Kashiwayama, T. Imanaka, and H. Kato. 2004. Domain architecture and activity of human Pex19p, a chaperone-like protein for intracellular trafficking of peroxisomal membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 279:38486-38494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M402204200
27. Snyder, W.B., A. Koller, A.J. Choy, and S. Subramani. 2000. The peroxin Pex19p interacts with multiple, integral membrane proteins at the peroxisomal membrane. J. Cell Biol. 149:1171-1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.149.6.1171
28. Tabak, H.F., I. Braakman, and A. van der Zand. 2013. Peroxisome formation and maintenance are dependent on the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82:723-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-081111-125123
29. Tam, Y.Y., A. Fagarasanu, M. Fagarasanu, and R.A. Rachubinski. 2005. Pex3p initiates the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment from a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280:34933-34939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M506208200
30. Titorenko, V.I., and R.A. Rachubinski. 1998. Mutants of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica defective in protein exit from the endoplasmic reticulum are also defective in peroxisome biogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2789-2803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.18.5.2789
31. Titorenko, V.I., and R.A. Rachubinski. 2000. Peroxisomal membrane fusion requires two AAA family ATPases, Pex1p and Pex6p. J. Cell Biol. 150:881-886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.150.4.881
32. van der Zand, A., I. Braakman, and H.F. Tabak. 2010. Peroxisomal membrane proteins insert into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell. 21:2057-2065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E10-02-0082
33. van der Zand, A., J. Gent, I. Braakman, and H.F. Tabak. 2012. Biochemically distinct vesicles from the endoplasmic reticulum fuse to form peroxisomes. Cell. 149:397-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.054
34. Yan, M., D.A. Rachubinski, S. Joshi, R.A. Rachubinski, and S. Subramani. 2008. Dysferlin domain-containing proteins, Pex30p and Pex31p, localized to two compartments, control the number and size of oleate-induced peroxisomes in Pichia pastoris. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:885-898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E07-10-1042
35. Yonekawa, S., A. Furuno, T. Baba, Y. Fujiki, Y. Ogasawara, A. Yamamoto, M. Tagaya, and K. Tani. 2011. Sec16B is involved in the endoplasmic reticulum export of the peroxisomal membrane biogenesis factor peroxin 16 (Pex16) in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:12746-12751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103283108