A stochastic cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis approach for supplier selection under uncertainty

International Transactions in Operational Research

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 725-748

  Dotoli, Mariagrazia ^a   Epicoco, Nicola ^a   Falagario, Marco ^a   Sciancalepore, Fabio ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Monte Carlo method; Supplier evaluation; Uncertainty modeling

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; MONTE CARLO METHODS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMPLEX EVALUATIONS; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; MONTE CARLO APPROACH; OPTIMAL SELECTION; SOURCING STRATEGIES; SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS; SUPPLIER SELECTION; UNCERTAINTY MODELING;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 84959365566     PISSN: 09696016     EISSN: 14753995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12155     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adler, N., Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z., 2002. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research 140, 249-265.
2. Albino, V., Garavelli, A.C., 1998. A neural network application to subcontractor rating in construction firms. International Journal of Project Management 16, 1, 9-14.
3. Andersen, P., Petersen, N.C., 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39, 10, 1261-1264.
4. Araz, C., Ozkarahan, I., 2007. Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. International Journal of Production Economics 106, 585-606.
5. Bhattacharya, A., Mohapatra, P., Kumar, V., Dey, P.K., Brady, M., Tiwari, M.K., Nudurupati, S.S., 2013. Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: a collaborative decision-making approach. Production Planning & Control. 25, 8, 698-714.
6. Burke, G.J., Vakharia, A.J., 2004. Supply chain management. In Bidgoli, H. (ed.) The Internet Encyclopedia, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
7. Cazals, C., Florens, J.P., Simar, L., 2002. Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. Journal of Econometrics 106, 1, 1-25.
8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
9. Che, Z.H., Wang, H.S., 2010. A hybrid approach for supplier cluster analysis. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 59, 745-763.
10. Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z., Lee, S.X., 1996. Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Annals of Operations Research 66, 279-295.
11. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K., 2007. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software (2nd edn). Springer, New York.
12. Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Epicoco, N., Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., 2012a. A Cross Efficiency Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis Technique for Supplier Evaluation Under Uncertainty. ETFA Conference 2012, September 17-21, Krakòw, Poland.
13. Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Epicoco, N., Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., 2013a. Using Cross-Efficiency Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis for Healthcare Facilities Performance Evaluation Under Uncertainty, Proc. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC 2013), October 13-16, Manchester, UK, pp. 912-917.
14. Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., Fanti, M.P., Iacobellis, G., 2009. A decision support system framework for purchasing management in supply chains. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 24, 3/4, 278-290.
15. Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., Fanti, M.P., Mangini, A.M., Sciancalepore, F., Ukovich, W., 2013b. A hierarchical optimization technique for the strategic design of distribution networks. Computers & Industrial Engineering 68, 849-864.
16. Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., 2012b. Balancing the additional costs of purchasing and the vendor set dimension to reduce public procurement costs. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 18, 189-198.
17. Degraeve, Z., Roodhooft, F., 1999. Effectively selecting suppliers using total cost of ownership. Journal of Supply Chain Management 35, 1, 5-10.
18. Demirtas, E.A., Üstün, Ö., 2008. An integrated multi-objective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 36, 1, 76-90.
19. Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., 2012. A hierarchical model for optimal supplier evaluation and selection in multiple sourcing contexts. International Journal of Production Research 11, 1-15.
20. Doyle, J.R. Green, R.H., 1995. Cross-evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUs. Information Systems and Operational Research 33, 3, 205-222.
21. Duan, G., Wang, J., Liu, N., 2010. Canonical correlation discriminant analysis in the selection of suppliers. Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE), Hangzhou, China, pp. 441-444.
22. Dulmin, R., Mininno, V., 2003. Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 9, 177-187.
23. Dyson, R.G., Shale, E.A., 2010. Data envelopment analysis, operational research and uncertainty. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61, 25-34.
24. Ellram, L., 1993. Total cost of ownership: elements and implementation. Journal of Supply Chain Management 29, 4, 2-11.
25. Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B.R., Tavares, G., 2008. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 42, 151-157.
26. Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., Costantino, N., Pietroforte, R., 2012. Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders. European Journal of Operational Research 218, 523-529.
27. Ghodsypour, S.H., O'Brien, C., 1998. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics 56-57, 199-212.
28. Ha, S.H., Krishnan, R., 2008. A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications 34, 2, 1303-1311.
29. Hatami-Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., Tavana, M., 2011. A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making. European Journal of Operational Research 214, 457-472.
30. Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K., 2010. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 202, 1, 16-24.
31. Jakhar, S.K., Barua, M.K., 2013. An integrated model of supply chain performance evaluation and decision-making using structural equation modelling and fuzzy AHP. Production Planning & Control 25, 11, 938-957.
32. Kao, C., Liu, T.-S., 2009. Stochastic data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of Taiwan commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research 196, 312-322.
33. Kneip, A., Simar, L., Wilson, P.W., 2008. Asymptotics and consistent bootstraps for DEA estimators in non-parametric frontier models. Econometric Theory 24, 6, 1663-1697.
34. Kuo, R.J., Wang, Y.C., Tien, F.C., 2010. Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, 12, 1161-1170.
35. Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D. 2000. Simulation Modeling and Analysis (4th edn). McGraw-Hill, New York.
36. Li, L., Zabinsky, Z.B., 2011. Incorporating uncertainty into a supplier selection problem. International Journal of Production Economics, 134, 344-356.
37. Li, S., Murat, A., Huang, W., 2009. Selection of contract suppliers under price and demand uncertainty in a dynamic market. European Journal of Operational Research 198, 830-847.
38. Ma, R., Yao, L., Jin, M., Ren, P., 2014. The DEA game cross-efficiency model for supplier selection problem under competition. Appl. Math 8, 2, 811-818.
39. Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B., Ragatz, G.L., 2005. Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management 23, 3-4, 371-388.
40. Petroni, A., Braglia, M., 2000. Vendor selection using principal component analysis. Journal of Supply Chain Management 36, 2, 63-69.
41. Ramanathan, R., 2007. Supplier selection problem: integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Management 12, 4, 258-261.
42. Ramsay, J., Wilson, I., 1990. Sourcing/contracting strategy selection. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 10, 8, 19-28.
43. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
44. Saaty, T.L., 1996. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.
45. Saen, R.F., 2007. Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. European Journal of Operational Research 183, 2, 741-747.
46. Saen, R.F., 2008. Supplier selection by the new AR-IDEA model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 39, 1061-1070.
47. Sawik T., 2010. Single vs. multiple objective supplier selection in a make to order environment. Omega 38, 3, 4, 203-212.
48. Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., Hogan, A.J., 1986. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In Silkman, R.H. (ed.) Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
49. Swift, C.O., 1995. Preferences for single sourcing and supplier selection criteria. Journal of Business Research 32, 105-111.
50. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., 2005. A note on a methodology for supply base optimization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52, 1, 130-139.
51. Tauchmann, H., 2011. Orderalpha: nonparametric order-α efficiency analysis for Stata. German Stata Users' Group Meetings 2011, University of Bamberg, Germany, Stata Users Group.
52. Treleven, M., Schweikhart, S.B., 1988. A risk/benefit analysis of sourcing strategies: single vs. multiple sourcing. Journal of Operations Management 7, 3-4, 93-114.
53. Ufuk Bilsel, R., Ravindran, A., 2011. A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part B 45, 1284-1300.
54. Verma, R., Pullman, M.E., 1998. An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 26, 6, 739-750.
55. Vose, D., 2008. Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide (2nd edn). John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
56. Weber, C.A., Desai, A., 1996. Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research 90, 142-155.
57. Wong, W.P., Jaruphongsa, W., Lee, L.H., 2008. Supply chain performance measurement system: a Monte Carlo DEA-based approach. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 3, 162-188.
58. Zhang, X., Zhang, L., 2011. Supplier selection and purchase problem with fixed cost and constrained order quantities under stochastic demand. International Journal of Production Economics 129, 1, 1-7.
59. Zhao, K., Yu, X., 2011. A case based reasoning approach on supplier selection in petroleum enterprises. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 6839-6847.
60. Zhu, J., 2003. Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): a review and improvement with an application. European Journal of Operational Research 144, 3, 513-529.
61. Zimmermann, H.-J., 2001. Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications (4th edn). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
62. Zohrehbandian, M., Sadeghi Gavgani, S., 2013. Cross-efficiency evaluation under the principle of rank priority of DMUs. World Applied Sciences Journal 21, 46-49.