Participation in protected area management planning in coastal Brazil

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 60, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-10

  Bockstael, Erika ^a   Bahia, Natália C F ^b   Seixas, Cristiana S ^b   Berkes, Fikret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazil; Cai aras; Environmental governance; Natural resources management; Participation; Protected areas

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; COMMUNITY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959363669     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adams C. Pitfalls of synchronicity: A case study of the Caiçaras in the Atlantic Rainforest of South-eastern Brazil. Pages 19-31. Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege 2003, Berghahn Books Oxford, UK. D.G. Anderson, E. Berglund (Eds.).
2. Adams C., Munari L.C., Vliet N.V., Murrieta R.S.S., Piperata B.A., Futemma C., Pedroso N.N., Taqueda C.S., Crevelaro M.A., Spressola-Prado V.L. Diversifying incomes and losing landscape complexity in Quilombola shifting cultivation communities of the Atlantic Rainforest (Brazil). Human Ecol. 2013, 41:119-137.
3. Araujo L. A Pesca Costeira Artesanal de Paraty, RJ: Uma Análise Multiescalar sob o Enfoque da Cogestão de Recursos Comuns. Doctoral dissertation 2014, IFCH/NEPAM/UNICAMP. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 362p.
4. Arnstein S.E. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners 1969, 35(2):216-224.
5. Bahia N.C.F., Seixas C.S., Araujo L.G., Farinaci J.S., Chamy P. Implementation of a national park over traditional lands of the Trindade community in Paraty, Brazil. Pages 46-51. Protected Areas and Place Making: How Do We Provide Conservation, Landscape Management, Tourism, Human Health and Regional Development? 2013, Forestry Sciences Department-ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, Brazil. T.C. Magro, L.M. Rodrigues, D.F. Silva Filho, J.L. Polizel, J. Leahy (Eds.).
6. Bawa K.S., Seidler R., Raven P.H. Reconciling conservation paradigms. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18(4):859-860.
7. Bene C., Neiland A.E. From participation to governance. A critical review of the concepts of governance, co-management and participation, and their implementation in small-scale inland fisheries in developing countries. WorldFish Centre Studies and Reviews 29. The WorldFish Centre, Penang, Malaysia and CGIAR Challenge Program on Water & Food 2006.
8. Berkes F. Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future. Environ. Conserv. 2010, 37(4):489-500.
9. Berkes F. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104(39):15188-15193.
10. Berkes F., Mahon R., McConney P., Pollnac R., Pomeroy R. Managing Small-scale Fisheries 2001, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
11. Brazil Law 9985/2000. National System of Conservation Units. Ministry of the Environment, Brasilia 2000, http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=322.
12. Castro F., Siqueira A.D., Brondizio E.S., Ferreira L.C. Use and misuse of the concepts of tradition and property rights in the conservation of natural resources in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil). Ambiente Soc. 2006, 9(1):23-39.
13. Chambers R. Rural Development: Putting the Last First 1983, Longman Group Limited, Essex, UK.
14. Choguill M.B.G. A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat Int. 1996, 20(3):431-444.
15. Chuenpagdee R., Jentoft S. Step zero for fisheries co-management: what precedes implementation. Mar. Policy 2007, 31:657-668.
16. Clarke B. SEeking the grail: evaluating whether Australia's Coastcare Program achieved meaningful community participation. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2008, 21(10):891-907.
17. Cleaver F. Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. J. Int. Dev. 1999, 11:597-612.
18. Coelho V.S.P., Favareto A. Questioning the relationship between participation and development: a case study of the Vale do Ribeira, Brazil. World Dev. 2008, 36(12):2937-2952.
19. Conti B.R., Antunes D.de C. Conflitos na gestão do Parque Nacional da Serra da Bocaina: entraves ao desenvolvimento local na vila de Trindade (Paraty, RJ). Interações 2012, 13(2):213-223.
20. Cooke B., Kothari U. The case for participation as tyranny. Pages 1-15. Participation: The New Tyranny? 2001, Zed Books, London, UK. B. Cooke, U. Kothari (Eds.).
21. Cornwall A. Historical perspectives on participation in development. Commonw. Comp. Polit. 2006, 44(1):62-83.
22. Costa A.C.G., Kottak C.P., Prado R.M. The socio-political context of participatory development in northeastern Brazil. Hum. Organ. 1997, 56(2):138-146.
23. Dean W. With Broadax and Firebrand: The Destruction of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest 1997, University of California Press, California, USA.
24. Diegues A.C. The myth of untamed nature in the Brazilian rainforest 1998, NUPAUB - Research Center on Human Population and Wetlands - University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
25. Dressler W., Buscher B., Schoon M., Brockington D., Hayes T., Kull C.A., McCarthy J., Shrestha K. From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environ. Conserv. 2010, 37(1):5-15.
26. Eversole R. Managing the pitfalls of participatory development: some insights from Australia. World Dev. 2003, 31(5):781-795.
27. Hanazaki N., Tamashiro J.Y., Leitao-Filho H.F., Begossi A. Diversity of plant uses in two Caiçara communities from the Atlantic Forest Coast, Brazil. Biodivers. Conserv. 2000, 9:597-615.
28. Hanazaki N., Berkes F., Seixas C.S., Peroni N. Livelihood diversity, food security and resilience among the Caiçara of coastal Brazil. Human Ecol. 2013, 41:153-164.
29. Hickey S., Mohan G. Towards participation as transformation: critical themes and challenges. Pages 3-24. Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? 2005, Zed Books, London, UK. S. Hickey, G. Mohan (Eds.).
30. Idrobo C.J., Davidson-Hunt I.J., Seixas C.S. Produced natures through the lens of biodiversity conservation and tourism: The Ponta Negra Caiçara in the Atlantic Forest coast of Brazil. Local Environ. Int. J. Justice Sustainability 2015, s1.
31. International Institute of Sustainable Development IUCN World Parks Congress 2014 Concludes with 'The Promise of Sydney'. Natural Resources Policy and Practice, International Institute for Sustainable Development, New York, USA. [online] 2014, http://nr.iisd.org/news/iucn-world-parks-congress-2014-concludes-with-the-promise-of-sydney/.
32. International Union for the Conservation of Nature International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. [online] 2010, http://www.iucn.org/news_homepage/news_by_date/2010_news/august_2010/?5807/IUCN-opens-a-new-office-in-Brazil.
33. International Union for the Conservation of Nature WCC-2012-Res-062-EN: Atlantic Forest in Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, as a priority biome for conservation. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. [online] 2012, https://www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/gpap_home/gpap_events/gpap_2012/gpap_paresolutions/.
34. Lhote Cristine Trindade para os trindadeiros. Dissertação de Mestrado 1982, IFCH, UNICAMP, Campinas.
35. Marcus R.R., Onjala J. Exit the State: Decentralization and the need for local social, political, and economic considerations in water resource allocation in Madagascar and Kenya. J. Hum. Dev. 2008, 9(1):23-45.
36. Metzger J.P. Conservation issues in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:1138-1140.
37. Mohan G. Participatory Development. Pages 49-54. The Companion to Development Studies 2002, Arnold London, UK. V. Desai, R.B. Potter (Eds.).
38. Mohan G., Stokke K. Participatory development and empowerment. The dangers of localism. Third World Quart. 2000, 21(2):247-268.
39. Morinville C., Harris L.M. Participation, politics, and panaceas: exploring the possibilities and limits of participatory urban water governance in Accra, Ghana. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19(3):36.
40. Mosse D. 'People's knowledge', participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development. Pages 16-35. Participation: The New Tyranny? 2001, Zed Books, London, UK. B. Cooke, U. Kothari (Eds.).
41. Murray G., King L. First nations values in protected area governance: tla-o-qui-aht tribal parks and pacific rim national park reserve. Hum. Ecol. 2012, 40:385-395.
42. Mutamba E. Community participation in natural resources management: reality or rhetoric?. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2004, 99:105-113.
43. Parkins J.R., Mitchell R.E. Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2005, 18:529-540.
44. Plante S., Breton Y. Espaço, pesca e turismo em Trindade. Pages 21-74. Enciclopédia Caiçara 2005, vol. III. O Olhar Estrangeiro. Ed. Hucitec, Brazil.
45. Plummer R., Fitzgibbon J. Co-management of natural resources: a proposed framework. Environ. Manag. 2004, 33(6):876-885.
46. Premauer L.M. Rights, Conservation, and Governance: Indigenous Peoples-National Parks Collaboration in Makuira, Colombia 2013, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg Canada.
47. Reason P., Bradbury H. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice 2008, SAGE Publications Ltd., London, UK.
48. Reddel T., Woolcock G. From consultation to participatory governance? A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland. Aust. J. Public Adm. 2004, 63(3):75-87.
49. Reid W.V., Berkes F., Wilbanks T., Capistrano D. Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems 2006, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and Island Press, Washington, DC.
50. Ribeiro M.C., Metzger J.P., Martensen A.C., Ponzoni F.J., Hirota M.M. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:1141-1153.
51. Rodriguez-Izquierdo R., Gavin M.C., Macedo-Bravo M.O. Barriers and triggers to community participation across different stages of conservation management. Environ. Conserv. 2010, 37(3):239-249.
52. Ross H., Buchy M., Proctor W. Laying down the ladder: a typology of public participation in Australian natural resources management. Aust. J. Environ. Manag. 2002, 9(4):205-217.
53. Rylands A.B., Brandon K. Brazilian protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19(3):612-618.
54. Sanches R.A. Caiçara communities of the southeastern coast of Sao Paulo state (Brazil): traditional activities and conservation policy for the Atlantic Rain Forest. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2001, 8(2):52-64.
55. Seixas C.S., Minte-Vera C.V., Ferreira R.G., Moura R.L., Curado I.B., Pezzuti J., The A.P.G., Francini-Filho R.B. Co-managing commons: advancing aquatic resources management in Brazil. Pages 183-204. Current Trends in Human Ecology 2009, Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, UK. P.F.M. Lopes, A. Begossi (Eds.).
56. Sen S., Nielsen J.R. Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis. Mar. Policy 1996, 20(5):405-418.
57. Sesan T. Peeling back the layers on participatory development: evidence from a community-based women's group in Western Kenya. Commun. Dev. J. 2014, 49(4):603-617.
58. Silva M. The Brazilian protected areas program. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19(3):608-611.
59. Tauli-Corpuz V. The concept of indigenous peoples' self-determined development or development with identity and culture: Challenges and trajectories 2008, Tebtebba Foundation, UNESCO, Baguio City, Philippines.
60. Thorkildsen K. Social-ecological changes in a Quilombola community in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil. Hum. Ecol. 2014, 42:913-927.
61. Trimble M., Araujo L.G., Seixas C.S. One party does not tango! Fishers' non-participation as a barrier to co-management in Paraty, Brazil. Ocean Coastal Manag. 2014, 92:9-18.
62. Trimble M., Berkes F. Towards adaptive co-management of small-scale fisheries in Uruguay and Brazil: lessons from using Ostrom's design principles. Marit. Stud. 2015, 14(14):1-20.
63. West P., Ignore J., Brockington D. Parks and people: the social impact of protected areas. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 2006, 35:251-277.
64. White S.C. Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Dev. Pract. 1996, 6(1):6-15.