Anticipatory Management for Instream Habitat: Application to Carneros Creek, California

River Research and Applications

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 280-294

  Beagle, J R ^a   Kondolf, G M ^b   Adams, R M ^c   Marcus, L ^d  

^a SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d California Land Stewardship Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Anticipatory management; Bank erosion; Buffers; Incision; Instream habitat

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BANK EROSION; BUFFER ZONE; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; FLOODPLAIN; HABITAT RESTORATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

CALIFORNIA; CARNEROS CREEK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84959333270     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.2863     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams R, Houston L. 2011. Preliminary cost analysis of options to stabilize stream banks and promotewater quality in Carneros Creek, Napa County, California. A report for the Fish Friendly Farming Program, California Land Stewardship Institute, Napa, CA. December 2011.
2. Armour CL, Duff DA, Elmore W. 1991. The effects of livestock grazing on riparian and stream ecosystems. Fisheries 16(1): 7-11.
3. Army Corps of Engineers. 2006. Attachment 2 Carneros Creek restoration demonstration project conceptual restoration recommendations draft report prepared by: CDM Sacramento, CA prepared for: Napa Resource Conservations District Napa, CA San Pablo Bay Watershed Restoration Program San Francisco District, Army Corps of Engineers September 2006.
4. Beagle JR. 2010. Creating an anticipatory management plan for Carneros Creek. Master's thesis in Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, University of California Berkeley. Available at: http://library.ucr.edu/wrca/restoration/theses.html [Accessed September 1, 2011].
5. Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM. 2010. Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience 60: 209-222.
6. Bisson PA, Bilby RE, Bryant MD, Dolloff CA, Grette GB, House RA, Murphy ML, Koski KV, Sedell JR. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in Pacific Northwest: Past, present, and future. In Streamside management: Forestry and fishery interactions, Salo EO, Cundy TW (eds). University of Washington, College of Forest Resources: Seattle; 143-190.
7. Chaney E, Elmore W, Platts WS. 1993. Livestock grazing on western riparian areas. Eagle, ID: Information Center, Inc.
8. Dunne T, Leopold LB. 1978. Water in environmental planning. W. H. Freeman: San Francisco.
9. Florsheim JL, Mount JF, Chin A. 2008. Bank erosion as a desirable attribute of rivers. Bioscience 58(6): 519-529.
10. Fritts HC, Swetnam TW. 1989. Dendroecology: a tool for evaluating variations in past and present forest environments. Advances in Ecological Research 19: 111-189.
11. Gonzalez del Tánago M, García de Jalón D, Román M. 2012. River restoration in Spain: theoretical and practical approach in the context of the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Management 50(1): 123-139.
12. Golet GH, Brown DL, Carlson M, Gardali T, Henderson A, Holl KD, Howell CA et al. 2013.Successes, failures and suggested future directions for ecosystem restoration of the Middle Sacramento River, California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 11 (3).
13. Gorman OT, Karr JR. 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59(3): 501-515.
14. Greco SE, Plant RE. 2003. Temporal mapping of riparian landscape change on the Sacramento River, miles 196-218, California, USA. Landscape Research 28(4): 405-426.
15. Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41: 540-551.
16. Grossinger RM, Striplen C, Brewster E, McKee LJ. 2004. Ecological, geomorphic, and land use history of Carneros Creek Watershed: A component of the watershed management plan for the Carneros Creek watershed, Napa County, California. A technical report of the regional watershed program, SFEI contribution 70, San Francisco Estuary Institute, Oakland CA. 48 pp.
17. Grossinger RM. 2012. Napa Valley historical ecology atlas: Exploring a landscape of transformation and resilience. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.
18. Gurnell AM, Piegay H. Gregory SV, Swanson FJ. 2002. Large wood and fluvial processes. Freshwater Biology 47:601-619.
19. Hanrahan V. 1948. Napa County history 1823-1948. Napa County Library. Produced and distributed bythe Napa Chamber of Commerce.
20. Hupp CR, Osterkamp WR. 1996. Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphic processes. Geomorphology 14: 277-295.
21. Janes K. 2012. Managing channel migration for multiple benefits: Lessons learned - a case studycomparison of Channel Migration Zone assessment, regulation, and management in Washington State. Masters thesis, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning. University of California: Berkeley.
22. Johnson AW, Ryba DM. 1992. A literature review of recommended buffer widths to maintain various functions of stream riparian areas. King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division: Seattle, WA.
23. Kondolf GM, Kattelmann R, Embury M, Erman DC. 1996. Status of riparian habitat. Sierra: NevadaEcosystem Project: Final report to Congress, Vol. II. Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Davis: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources.
24. Kondolf GM. 2006. River restoration and meanders. Ecology and Society 11(2): 42. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art42/.
25. Kondolf GM. 2012. The Espace de Liberte and restoration of fluvial process: When can the river restore itself and when must we intervene? In River Conservation and Management. Boon PJ, Raven PJ (eds). 2012. John Wiley and Sons, LTD: UK.
26. Knighton D. 1998. Fluvial forms and processes: A new perspective. Hodder Arnold Publishing: Great Britain.
27. Larsen EW, Girvetz EH, Fremier AK. 2006. Assessing the effects of alternative setback levee scenarios employing a river meander migration model. Environmental Management 37(6): 880-897.
28. Lee P, Smyth C, Boutin S. 2004. Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States. Journal of Environmental Management 70: 165-180.
29. Lowrance R, Williams RG, Inamdar SR, Bosch DD, Sheridan JM. 2001. Evaluation of coastal plain conservation buffers using the riparian ecosystem management model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37: 1445-1455.
30. Malczewski J. 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning 62(1): 3-65.
31. Merrill AG, Benning RL, Fites-Kaufmann J. 2006. Factors controlling structural and floristic variation of riparian zones in a mountainous landscape of Western U.S.A. Western North American Naturalist 66(2): 137-154.
32. Michalková M, Piégay H, Kondolf GM, Greco SE. 2011. Lateral erosion of the Sacramento River, California (1942-1999), and responses of channel and floodplain lake to human influences. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 36: 257-272. DOI: 10.1002/esp.2106.
33. Miranda LE. 2001. A review of guidance and criteria for managing reservoirs and associated riverineenvironments to benefit fish and fisheries. In Dams, fish and fisheries: Opportunities challenges and conflict resolution, Marmulla G (ed). FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 419: Rome, Italy.
34. Napolitano M, Potter S, Whyte D. 2007. Napa River watershed sediment TMDL and habitat enhancement plan. Staff Report of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. San Francisco Bay Region.
35. Nassauer JI. 1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14: 161-170.
36. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2012. The Emergency Watershed Protection Program. Available at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1045263.pdf [Accessed June 7, 2013].
37. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2008. Stream restoration design (National Engineering Handbook 654) May 2008. Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC.
38. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1996. Streambank and shoreline protection in stream restoration design (Engineering Field Handbook 650) December 1996. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC.
39. Ollero A, Ibisate A. 2012. Space for the river: a flood management tool. Flood Risk and Flood Management. Nova Science Pub: Hauppauge NY; 199-218.
40. Ollero A, Ibisate A, Elso J. 2009. El territorio fluvial y sus dificultades de aplicación. Geographicalia 56: 37-62.
41. Piégay H, Darby SE, Mosselman E, Surian N. 2005. The erodible corridor concept: applicabilityand limitations for river management. River Research and Applications 21: 773-789.
42. Poff L, Bain M, Karr J, Prestegaard K, Richter B, Sparks R, Stromberg J. 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47(11): 769-784.
43. Polyakov V, Fares A, Ryder MH. 2005. Precision riparian buffers for the control of nonpoint source pollutant loading into surface water: A review. Environmental Review 13: 129-144.
44. Rodhe S, Hostmann M, Peter A, Ewald, KC. 2006. Room for rivers: An integrative search strategy forfloodplain restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning 78(1-2): 50-70.
45. Scott ML, Friedman JM, Auble GT. 1996. Fluvial processes and the establishment of bottomland trees. Geomorphology 14(4): 327-339.
46. Schmetterling D, Clancy CG, Brandt TM. 2001. Effects of riprap bank reinforcement on stream salmonids in the Western United States. Fisheries 26(7): 6-23.
47. Schroder JF. 1980. Dendrogeomorphology: review and new techniques of tree-ring dating. Progress in Physical Geography 4: 161-188.
48. Seedang S, Fernald AG, Adams RM, Landers DH. 2008. Economic analysis of water temperature reduction practices in a large river floodplain: an exploratory study of the Willamette River, Oregon. River Research and Applications 24(7): 941-959.
49. Simon A, Castro J. 2003. Measurement and analysis of alluvial channel form. In Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, Kondolf GM, Piégay H (eds). John Wiley & Sons: Chicester, UK; 292-322.
50. Smith J. 1989. Recovery of riparian vegetation on an intermittent stream following removal of cattle.USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110. 1989.
51. Stokes MA. 1996. An introduction to tree-ring dating. University of Chicago Press: Imprint Chicago.
52. Stonebridge Research. 2008. Economic impact of the Napa Valley wine industry. Prepared for the Napa Valley Vintners. http://www.napavintners.org/issues/community/2008_Economic_Impact_Report.pdf. [Accessed February 10, 2010].
53. Store R, Kangas J. 2001. Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling. Landscape and Urban Planning 55(2): 79-93.
54. Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1995. Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11(1): 105-119.
55. Watanabe M, Adams RM, Wu J. 2006. Economics of environmental management in a spatially heterogeneous river basin. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(3): 617-631.
56. Weber L. 1998. Old Napa Valley: The history to 1900. Wine Ventures Publishing. St. Helena.
57. Xiang WN. 1993. A GIS method for riparian water quality buffer generation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 7(1): 57-70.