River restoration and meanders

Ecology and Society

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages

  Kondolf, G Mathias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Channel classification; Cultural preferences; Meandering channels; River restoration

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL CHANGE; CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; MEANDER; RIVER CHANNEL; RIVER ENGINEERING; RIVER SYSTEM;

EID: 33846067166     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-01795-110242     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Appleton, J. 1975. The experience of landscape. John Wiley, London, UK.
2. Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S. Katz, G. M. Kondolf, P. S. Lake, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, and T. K. O'Don. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636-637.
3. Binder, W. 2004. Restoration of rivers and floodplains in Bavaria. Pages 27-32 in D. Geres, editor. River Restoration 2004: principles, processes, practices; proceedings of the Third ECRR Conference on River Restoration 2004 (Zagreb, 2004). European Centre for River Restoration, National Environmental Research Centre, Roskilde, Denmark.
4. Binder, W. 2005. The rehabilitation of the Isar in Munich: a channelized river back to nature. Pages 290-295 in J. T. Toubier and J. Schanze, editors. Urban river rehabilitation: proceedings of the International Conference on Urban River Rehabilitation (Dresden, 2005). Leibnitz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development, Dresden, Germany.
5. Brautigan, R. 1967. Trout fishing in America. Laurel, New York, New York, USA.
6. Brookes, A. 1987. Restoring the sinuousity of artificially straightened stream channels. Environmental Geology and Water Science 10:33-41.
7. Burnson, D. 1992. Lower Cuneo channel dimensions report of findings. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California, USA.
8. Cullen, G. 1961. Townscapes. Architectural Press, London, UK.
9. Downs, P. W., K. S. Skinner, and G. M. Kondolf. 2001. Rivers and streams. Pages 267-291 in M. R. Perrow and A. J. Davy, editors. Handbook of ecological restoration: principles of restoration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Doyle, M. W., D. E. Miller, and J. M. Harbor. 1999. Should river restoration be based on classification schemes or process models? Inisights from the history of geomorphology. Available online at: http://www.blwi.com/DoyleMD StreamRestorationHistorical1999aa.pdf.
11. Frothingham, K. M., B. L. Rhoads, and E. E. Herricks. 2003. A multiscale conceptual framework for integrated ecogeomorphological research to support stream naturalization in the agricultural midwest. Environmental Management 29:16-33.
12. Gasith, A., and V. H. Resh. 1999. Streams in Mediterranean-climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:51-81.
13. Goldi, C. 1989. Resuscitation programme for flowing waters in the Canton of Zurich. Anthos 2:1-5.
14. Gunderson, L. H., and C. S. Holling. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, D. C., USA.
15. Hansen, A. 2003. Post-project appraisal of a channel reconstruction on Cuneo Creek, California. Available online at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/wrca/restoration/.
16. Hecht, B. 1994. South of the spotted owl: restoration strategies for episodic channels and riparian corridors in central California. Pages 104-117 in D. M. Kent and J. T. Zentner, editors. Western wetlands: selected proceedings of the 1993 Conference of the Society of Wetland Scientists. Society of Wetland Scientists, McLean, Virginia, USA.
17. Hogarth, W. 1753. The analysis of beauty. Reprinted in 1997 by Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
18. Iversen, T. M., B. Kronvang, B. L. Madsen, P. Markmann, and M. B. Nielsen. 1993. Re-establishment of Danish streams: restoration and maintenance measures. Aquatic Conservations: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 3:73-92.
19. Juracek, K. E., and F. A. Fitzpatrick. 2003. Limitations and implications of stream classification. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39:659-670.
20. Kaplan, R., and S. Kaplan. 1989. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
21. Kondolf, G. M. 1995a. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3(2):133-136.
22. Kondolf, G. M. 1995b. Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: uses and limitations. Aquatic Conservation 5:127-141.
23. Kondolf, G. M. 1998. Lessons learned from river restoration projects in California. Aquatic Conservation 8:39-52
24. Kondolf, G. M. 2000. Process vs form in restoration of rivers and streams. Pages 120-124 in D. L. Scheu, editor. Annual meeting proceedings of the American Society of Landscape Architects (St. Louis, 2000). American Society of Landscape Architects, Washington, D.C., USA.
25. Kondolf, G. M., A. Boulton, S. O'Daniel, G. Poole, F. Rahel, E. Stanley, E. Wohl, A. Bang, J. Carlstrom, C. Cristoni, H. Huber, S. Koljonen, P. Louhi, and K. Nakamura. 2006. Process-based ecological river restoration: visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecology and Society 11(2): 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art5/.
26. Kondolf, G. M., and M. Larson. 1995. Historical channel analysis and its application to riparian and aquatic habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation 5:109-126.
27. Kondolf, G. M., and E. M. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19:1-15.
28. Kondolf, G. M., H. Piégay, and N. Landon. 2002. Channel response to increased and decreased bedload supply from land-use change: contrasts between two catchments. Geomorphology 45:35-51.
29. Kondolf, G. M., M. W. Smeltzer, and S. Railsback. 2001. Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream. Environmental Management 28(6):761-776.
30. Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller. 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA.
31. Malakoff, D. 2004. The river doctor. Science 305:937-939.
32. Miller, J. R., and J. B. Ritter 1996. An examination of the Rosgen classification of natural rivers. Catena 27:295-299.
33. Mozingo, L. A. 1997. The aesthetics of ecological design: seeing science as culture. Landcape Journal 16:46-59.
34. Myers, M. E. 2004. The line of grace: principles of road aesthetics in the design of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Landscape Journal 23:121-140.
35. Nassauer, J. I. 1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14:161-170.
36. National Research Council (NRC). 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
37. Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah, D. L. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. H. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G. M. Kondolf, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T.K. O'Donnell, L. Pagano, P. Srivastava, and E. Sudduth. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208-217.
38. Richards, K. S., J. Brasington, and F. Hughes. 2002. Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: ecological implications and a potential modelling strategy. Freshwater Biology 47:559-579.
39. Rosgen, D. L. 1985. A stream classification system. Pages 91-95 in U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Riparian ecosystems and their management. First North American Riparian Conference. U.S Forest Service Report RM-120.
40. Rosgen, D. L. 1991. Bull Creek Watershed restoration plan. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, Colorado, USA.
41. Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classificafion of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
42. Rosgen, D. L. 1996. Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, Colorado, USA.
43. Rosgen, D. L., and B. L. Fittante. 1986. Fish habitat structures: a selection guide using stream classification. Pages 163-179 in J. G. Miller, J. A. Arway, and R. F. Carline, editors. Proceedings of the 5th Trout Stream Improvement Workshop (Lock Haven, 1986). Pennsylvania Fish Commission Publications, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
44. Shields, F. D., S. S. Knight, N. Morin, and J. Blank. 2003. Response of fishes and aquatic habitats to sand-bed stream restoration using large woody debris. Hydrobiologia 494:251-257.
45. Short, D. A. 1993. A sediment budget for a small northcoast drainage basin, Humboldt county, California. Thesis. Humboldt State University, Arcata, California, USA.
46. Smith, S. M., and K. L. Prestegaard. 2005. Hydraulic performance of a morphology-based stream channel design. Water Resources Research 41: doi:10.1029/2004WR003926.
47. Ulrich, R. S. 1983. Aesthetic and effective response to natural environment. Pages 85-125 in I. Altman and J. Wohlwill, editors. Behavior and the natural environment. Plenum, New York, New York, USA.
48. Ward, J. V., and J. A. Stanford. 1995. Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 11:105-119.
49. Water Consulting Inc. and D. Rosgen. 2002. Draft conceptual restoration plan for the Clark Fork River and Blackfoot River near Milltown Dam; report to State of Montana, Natural Resources Damage Program and Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Water Consulting Inc., Hamilton, Montana, USA, and Wildland Hydrology, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
50. Wohl, E., P. L. Angermeier, B. Bledsoe, G. M. Kondolf, L. MacDonnell, D. M. Merritt, M. A. Palmer, N. L. Poff, and D. Tarboton. 2005. River restoration. Available online at: http://www.cuahsi.org/cyberseminars/ Wohl-20040923-paper.pdf.
51. Wolman, M. G., and R. Gerson. 1978. Relative scales of time and effectiveness of climate in watershed geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes 3:189-209.
52. Zembsch, S. 1993. Uvas Creek Preserve creek restoration plan; report to the Habitat Restoration Group and Beals Landscape Architects by Watershed Science, Aromas, California. Watershed Science, Aromas, California, USA.