Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 474, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1472-1482

  Lyman, Stephen ^a   Lee, Yuo Yu ^a   Franklin, Patricia D ^b   Li, Wenjun ^b   Mayman, David J ^a   Padgett, Douglas E ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PAIN; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECREATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; COST OF ILLNESS; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HIP; HIP REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REGISTER; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; COST OF ILLNESS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84959322516     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4718-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ayers DC, Franklin PD. Joint replacement registries in the United States: a new paradigm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1567–1569.
2. Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: proof of concept from FORCE-TJR Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3419–3425.
3. Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J. Rheumatol. 2002;29:2473–2476.
4. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167.
5. Bureau of Labor Statistics. American Time Survey. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/tus/. Accessed January 12, 2014.
6. CMS.gov. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Measure Methodology. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/Measure-Methodology.html. Accessed October 6, 2015.
7. Concannon TW. Can patient centered outcomes research improve healthcare? BMJ. 2015;351:h3859.
8. Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker GA, Conaghan PG, Roos EM, Jordan JM, Maillefert JF, Dougados M, Lohmander LS. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA: HOOS-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS) – an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:551–559.
9. Dorans NJ, Schmitt AP. Constructed Response and Differential Item Functioning: A Pragmatic Approach. ETS Research Report RR-91-47. Princeton, NJ, USA: Educational Testing Service; 1991.
10. Dorans, NJ, Schmitt, AP, Bleistein CA. The standardization approach to assessing comprehensive differential item functioning. J Educ Meas. 1992;29:309–319.
11. Fisher WP Jr. Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1992;6:238.
12. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:i-iv, 1–74.
13. Franklin PD, Allison JJ, Ayers DC. Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement. JAMA. 2012;308:1217–1218.
14. Franklin PD, Harrold L, Ayers DC. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3482–3488.
15. Holland PW, Wainer H, eds. Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.
16. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties: a comparison between the Harris score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:1037–1041.
17. Kalantar JS, Talley NJ. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomized study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:1117–1122.
18. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990;28:632–642.
19. Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:85–106.
20. Linacre JM. A User’s Guide to Winsteps-Ministep: Rasch-model Computer Programs. Program Manual 3.68.0. Available at: http://www.winsteps.com/manuals.htm. Accessed December 1, 2015.
21. Linacre JM, Wright BD. A User’s Guide to Bigsteps. Winsteps.com. Available at: http://www.winsteps.com/a/bigsteps.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2015.
22. Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149–174.
23. Matharu GS, McBryde CW, Robb CA, Pynsent PB. An analysis of Oxford hip and knee scores following primary hip and knee replacement performed at a specialist centre. Bone Joint J. 2014;96:928–935.
24. Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ. 2015;350:g7818.
25. Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(suppl 11):S200–207.
26. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS): validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:10.
27. Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: a comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:801–808.
28. Pallant JF, Miller RL, Tennant A. Evaluation of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale using Rasch analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2006;6:28.
29. Rahman WA, Greidanus NV, Siegmeth A, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS. Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:444–453.
30. Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:788–794.
31. Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, Leidy NK, Patrick DL, Petrie CD. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report. Value Health. 2009;12:1075–1083.
32. Smith AB, Rush R, Fallowfield LJ, Velikova G, Sharpe M. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:33.
33. Smith RM, Miao CY. Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In: Wilson M, ed. Objective Measurement: Theory Into Practice. Vol 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp; 1994:316–328.
34. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003.
35. Wainer H, Kiely GL Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets. J Educ Meas. 1987;24:185–201.
36. Walker JA. Total hip replacement: improving patients’ quality of life. Nurs Stand. 2010;24:51–57; quiz 58.
37. th ed. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group; 1996.
38. nd ed. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Inc; 1999. Available at: http://www.rasch.org/measess/me-all.pdf. Accessed January 4, 2016.