Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): III. Accurate Preoperative Prediction of 8 Adverse Outcomes Using 8 Predictor Variables

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 264, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 23-31

  Meguid, Robert A ^a,b   Bronsert, Michael R ^a   Juarez Colunga, Elizabeth ^a,c   Hammermeister, Karl E ^a,b   Henderson, William G ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c Food Science and Human Nutrition   (United States)

Author keywords

overall surgical morbidity; parsimonious assessment; postoperative risk prediction models; surgical outcomes; surgical risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CALIBRATION; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MORBIDITY; PATIENT CARE; PREDICTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM; PREOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENERAL SURGERY; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GENERAL SURGERY; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84959293787     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001678     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Trevena LJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Edwards A, et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13(suppl 2): S7
2. Arterburn D. Health plan leadership promotes shared decision making through use of decision aids by surgeons, contributing to lower joint replacement rates and overall health care costs. https://innovations.ahrq.gov/profiles/healthplan- leadership-promotes-shared-decisionmaking-Through-use-decision-Aidssurgeons. 8-28-2013
3. Arterburn D, Wellman R, Westbrook E, et al. Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee surgery rates and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31: 2094-2104
4. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ 2011 342 d1745
5. Barnett S, Moonesinghe SR. Clinical risk scores to guide perioperative management. Postgrad Med J. 2011; 87: 535-541
6. Moonesinghe SR. Individualised surgical outcomes: please look the other way. Postgrad Med J. 2013; 89: 677-678
7. Protopapa KL, Simpson JC, Smith NC, et al. Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT). Br J Surg. 2014; 101: 1774-1783
8. Liao L, Mark DB. Clinical prediction models: are we building better mousetraps?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 851-853
9. Ivanov J, Borger MA, David TE, et al. Predictive accuracy study: comparing a statistical model to clinicians' estimates of outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 70: 162-168
10. Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, et al. Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208: 1009-1016
11. Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 833-842
12. Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, et al. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 336-346
13. Paruch JL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY. An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21: 5-7
14. Raval MV, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, et al. Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211: 715-723
15. Vaid S, Bell T, Grim R, et al. Predicting risk of death in general surgery patients on the basis of preoperative variables using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Perm J. 2012; 16: 10-17
16. Meguid RA, Bronsert MR, Juarez-Colunga E, et al. Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): II. Parsimonious risk models for postoperative adverse outcomes addressing need for laboratory variables and surgeon specialty-specific models. Ann Surg. 2016. In press
17. User Guide for the 2012 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File. 2013. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
18. Meguid RA, Bronsert MR, Juarez-Colunga E, et al. Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): I. Parsimonious, clinically meaningful groups of postoperative complications by factor analysis. Ann Surg. 2016. In press
19. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982; 143: 29-36
20. Hosmer DWJr, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed, New York, NY: Wiley; 2000
21. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol. 1982; 115: 92-106
22. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010; 21: 128-138
23. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: http://www.r-project.org/2014. Accessed March 16, 2015
24. Ramanan B, Gupta PK, Gupta H, et al. Development and validation of a bariatric surgery mortality risk calculator. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 214: 892-900
25. Parikh P, Shiloach M, Cohen ME, et al. Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource. HPB (Oxford). 2010; 12: 488-497
26. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. ACS NSQIP1 Semiannual Report, July 10, 2015. Chicago American College of Surgeons; 2015
27. Harrell FE Jr. Multivariable modeling strategies. In: Harrell Jr FE, editor. RegressionModeling Strategies. New York, Philadelphia: Springer; 2001: 53-85
28. Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52: 935-942
29. Hannan EL, Wu C, DeLong ER, et al. Predicting risk-Adjusted mortality for CABG surgery: logistic versus hierarchical logistic models. Med Care. 2005; 43: 726-735
30. Cohen ME, Dimick JB, Bilimoria KY, et al. Risk adjustment in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: a comparison of logistic versus hierarchical modeling. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209: 687-693