Predictive accuracy study: Comparing a statistical model to clinicians' estimates of outcomes after coronary bypass surgery

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 162-168

  Ivanov, Joan ^a,b   Borger, Michael A ^a   David, Tirone E ^a   Cohen, Gideon ^a   Walton, Nancy ^a   Naylor, C David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033914697     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01387-4     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Tu J.V., Jaglal S.B., Naylor C.D. Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 91:1995;677-684.
2. Tu J.V., Mazer C.D., Levinton C., Armstrong P.W., Naylor C.D. A predictive index for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery. Can Med Assoc J. 151:1994;177-185.
3. O'Connor G.T., Plume S.K., Olmstead E.M., et al. A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA. 275:1996;841-846.
4. Tu J.V., Sykora K., Naylor C.D. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery How many risk factors are enough? J Am Coll Cardiol. 30:1997;1317-1323.
5. Charlson M., Ales K.L., Simon R. Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies is it magic or methods? Arch Intern Med. 147:1987;2155-2161.
6. Edwards F.H., Clark R.E., Schwartz M. Coronary artery bypass grafting The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database experience . Ann Thorac Surg. 57:1994;12-19.
7. Higgins T.L., Estafanous F.G., Loop F.D., Berck G.J., Blum J.M., Paranandi L. Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients a clinical severity score . JAMA. 267:1992;2344-2348.
8. Hannan E.L., Kilburn H. Jr, O'Donnell J.F., Lukacik G., Shields E.P. Adult open heart surgery in New York state an analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality rates . JAMA. 264:1990;2768-2774.
9. Luft H.S., Romano P.S. Chance, continuity and change in hospital mortality rates. JAMA. 270:1993;331-337.
10. Silber J.H., Rosenbaum P.R., Schwartz S., Ross R.N., Williams S.V. Evaluation of the complication rate as a measure of quality of care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 274:1995;317-323.
11. Wasson J.H., Sox H.C., Neff R.K., Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules applications and methodologic standards . N Engl J Med. 313:1985;793-799.
12. Ivanov J., Tu J.V., Naylor C.D. Ready-made, recalibrated, remodelled? Issues in the use of risk indices for assessing mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 99:1999;2098-2104.
13. Hannan E.L., Kilburn H. Jr, Lindsey M.L., Lewis R. Clinical versus administrative data bases for CABG surgery does it matter? Med Care. 30:1992;892-907.
14. Hannan E.L., Siu A.L., Kumar D., Kilburn H. Jr, Chassin M.R. The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York state the role of surgeon volume . JAMA. 273:1995;209-213.
15. Teres D., Lemeshow S. Why severity models should be used with caution. Crit Care Clin. 10:1994;93-110.
16. Ivanov J., Weisel R.D., David T.E., Naylor C.D. Fifteen-year trends in risk severity and operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 97:1998;673-680.
17. Poses R.M., Cebul R.D., Centor R.M. Evaluating physicians' probabilistic judgments. Medical Decision Making. 8:1988;233-240.
18. Poses R.M., Bekes C., Winkler R.L., Scott W.E., Copare F.J. Are two (inexperienced) heads better than one (experienced) head? Averaging house officers' prognostic judgments for critically ill patients. Arch Intern Med. 150:1990;1874-1878.
19. Shapiro A.R. An evaluation of clinical prediction a method and initial application . N Engl J Med. 296:1977;1509-1514.
20. Cheng D.C., Karski J., Peniston C., et al. Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting a prospective randomized controlled trial . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 112:1996;755-764.
21. Cheng D.C., Karski J., Peniston C., et al. Early tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery reduces costs and improves resource use. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 85:1996;1300-1310.
22. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 1989;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
23. Rao V., Ivanov J., Weisel R.D., Ikonomidis J.S., Christakis G.T., David T.E. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 112:1996;38-51.
24. SAS Language Guide for Personal Computers. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 1988.
25. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 143:1982;29-36.
26. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. A method for comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 148:1983;839-843.
27. McClish D.K., Powell S.H. How well can physicians estimate mortality in a medical intensive care unit? Medical Decision Making. 9:1989;125-132.
28. Detsky A.S., Stricker S.C., Mulley A.G., Thibault G.E. Prognosis, survival, and the expenditure of hospital resources for patients in an intensive-care unit. N Engl J Med. 305:1981;667-672.
29. Myers D.G., Lamm H. The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bull. 83:1976;602-627.
30. Dolan J.G., Bordley D.R., Mushlin A.I. An evaluation of clinicians' subjective prior probability estimates. Medical Decision Making. 6:1986;216-223.
31. Poses R.M., Cebul R.D., Collins M., Fager S.S. The importance of disease prevalence in transporting clinical prediction rules. The case of streptococcal pharyngitis. Ann Intern Med. 105:1986;586-591.
32. Oxman A.D., Thomson M.A., Davis D.A., Haynes R.B. No magic bullets a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice . Can Med Assoc J. 153:1995;1423-1431.
33. Davis D.A., Thomson M.A., Oxman A.D., Haynes R.B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 274:1995;700-705.
34. Concato J., Feinstein A.R., Holford T.R. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med. 118:1993;201-210.
35. Laupacis A., Sekar N., Stiell I.G. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 277:1997;488-494.