Correlation between habituation of visual-evoked potentials and magnetophosphene thresholds in migraine: A case-control study

Cephalalgia

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 258-264

  Ambrosini, Anna ^a   Iezzi, Ennio ^a   Perrotta, Armando ^a   Kisialiou, Aliaksei ^b   Nardella, Andrea ^a   Berardelli, Alfredo ^a,c   Pierelli, Francesco ^a,c   Schoenen, Jean ^d  

^a IRCCS NEUROMED   (Italy)

^b IRCCS SAN RAFFAELE PISANA   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

cortical excitability; habituation; magnetophosphene threshold; Migraine; visual evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; MAGNETOPHOSPHENE THRESHOLD; MALE; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; NERVE EXCITABILITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRAINE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; PHOSPHENES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959290498     PISSN: 03331024     EISSN: 14682982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0333102415590241     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Stovner LJ, Andrée C,. Prevalence of headache in Europe: A review for the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain 2010; 11: 289-299.
2. Goadsby PJ, Charbit AR, Andreou AP, et al. Neurobiology of migraine. Neuroscience 2009; 161: 327-341.
3. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 629-808.
4. Bernstein C, Burstein R,. Sensitization of the trigeminovascular pathway: Perspective and implications to migraine pathophysiology. J Clin Neurol 2012; 8: 89-99.
5. Magis D, Ambrosini A, Bendtsen L, et al. Evaluation and proposal for optimalization of neurophysiological tests in migraine: Part 1-electrophysiological tests. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 1323-1338.
6. Schoenen J, Wang W, Albert A, et al. Potentiation instead of habituation characterizes visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks. Eur J Neurol 1995; 2: 115-122.
7. Harris J,. Habituatory response decrement in the intact organism. Psychol Bull 1943; 40: 385-422.
8. De Tommaso M, Ambrosini A, Brighina F, et al. Altered sensory processing in migraine. Nat Rev Neurol 2014; 10: 144-155.
9. Omland PM, Nilsen KB, Uglem M, et al. Visual evoked potentials in interictal migraine: No confirmation of abnormal habituation. Headache 2013; 53: 1071-1086.
10. Bednář M, Kubová Z, Kremláček J,. Lack of visual evoked potentials amplitude decrement during prolonged reversal and motion stimulation in migraineurs. Clin Neurophys 2014; 125: 1223-1230.
11. Ambrosini A, Schoenen J, Magis D, et al. EHMTI-0222. Habituation of visual evoked potentials in migraine: Comparison between blinded and non-blinded analyses. J Headache Pain 2014; 15 (Suppl 1): E1.
12. Aurora SK, Ahmad BK, Welch KMA, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation confirms hyperexcitability of visual cortex in migraine. Neurology 1998; 50: 1105-1110.
13. Brighina F, Piazza A, Daniele O, et al. Modulation of visual cortical excitability in migraine with aura: Effects of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2002; 145: 177-181.
14. Aurora SK, Cao Y, Bowyer SM, et al. The occipital cortex is hyperexcitable in migraine: Experimental evidence. Headache 1999; 39: 469-476.
15. Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, Palmer JE, et al. Visual cortex excitability in migraine with and without aura. Headache 2001; 41: 565-572.
16. Aurora SK, Welch KM, Al-Sayed F,. The threshold for phosphenes is lower in migraine. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 258-263.
17. Young WB, Oshinsky ML, Shechter AL, et al. Consecutive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Phosphene thresholds in migraineurs and controls. Headache 2004; 44: 131-135.
18. Aurora SK, Barrodale P, Chronicle EP, et al. Cortical inhibition is reduced in chronic and episodic migraine and demonstrates a spectrum of illness. Headache 2005; 45: 546-552.
19. Gerwig M, Niehaus L, Kastrup O, et al. Visual cortex excitability in migraine evaluated by single and paired magnetic stimuli. Headache 2005; 45: 1394-1399.
20. Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Mohamed KA,. Motor and visual cortical excitability in migraineurs patients with or without aura: Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin 2006; 36: 13-18.
21. Gunaydin S, Soysal A, Atay T, et al. Motor and occipital cortex excitability in migraine patients. Can J Neurol Sci 2006; 33: 63-67.
22. Siniatchkin M, Reich AL, Shepherd AJ, et al. Peri-ictal changes of cortical excitability in children suffering from migraine without aura. Pain 2009; 147: 132-140.
23. Antal A, Arlt S, Nitsche MA, et al. Higher variability of phosphene thresholds in migraineurs than in controls: A consecutive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cephalalgia 2006; 26: 865-870.
24. Bohotin V, Fumal A, Vandenheede M, et al. Excitability of visual V1-V2 and motor cortices to single transcranial magnetic stimuli in migraine: A reappraisal using a figure-of-eight coil. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 264-270.
25. Brighina F, Piazza A, Daniele O, et al. Modulation of visual cortical excitability in migraine with aura: Effects of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2002; 145: 177-181.
26. Afra J, Mascia A, Gérard P, et al. Interictal cortical excitability in migraine: A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor and visual cortices. Ann Neurol 1998; 44: 209-215.
27. Haigh S, Karanovic O, Wilkinson F, et al. Cortical hyperexcitability in migraine and aversion to patterns. Cephalalgia 2012; 32: 236-240.
28. Mickleborough MJ, Hayward J, Chapman C, et al. Reflexive attentional orienting in migraineurs: The behavioral implications of hyperexcitable visual cortex. Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 1642-1651.
29. Brennan KC,. Turn down the lights! An irritable occipital cortex in migraine without aura. Neurology 2011; 76: 206-207.
30. Lang E, Kaltenhäuser M, Neundörfer B, et al. Hyperexcitability of the primary somatosensory cortex in migraine-a magnetoencephalographic study. Brain 2004; 127: 2459-2469.
31. Lipton RB, Pearlman SH,. Transcranial magnetic simulation in the treatment of migraine. Neurotherapeutics 2010; 7: 204-212.
32. Coppola G, Currà A, Sava SL, et al. Changes in visual-evoked potential habituation induced by hyperventilation in migraine. J Headache Pain 2010; 11: 497-503.
33. Knott JR, Irwin DA,. Anxiety, stress and the contingent negative variation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973; 29: 538-541.
34. Bohotin V, Fumal A, Bohotin CR, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital cortex modifies habituation of visual evoked potentials in healthy volunteers and migraineurs. Cephalalgia 2001; 21: 388-389.
35. Coppola G, Pierelli F, Schoenen J,. Is the cerebral cortex hyperexcitable or hyperresponsive in migraine?. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 1427-1439.
36. Coppola G, Ambrosini A, Di Clemente L, et al. Interictal abnormalities of gamma band activity in visual evoked responses in migraine: An indication of thalamocortical dysrhythmia?. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 1360-1367.
37. Merabet LB, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A,. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as an investigative tool in the study of visual function. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 356-368.
38. Taylor PC, Walsh V, Eimer M,. The neural signature of phosphene perception. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 1408-1417.
39. Bagattini C, Mazzi C, Savazzi S,. Waves of awareness for occipital and parietal phosphenes perception. Neuropsychologia 2015; 70: 114-125.
40. Di Russo F, Pitzalis S, Spitoni G, et al. Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 874-886.
41. Barnikol UB, Amunts K, Dammers J, et al. Pattern reversal visual evoked responses of V1/V2 and V5/MT as revealed by MEG combined with probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 86-108.
42. Perfetti B, Franciotti R, Della Penna S, et al. Low- and high-frequency evoked responses following pattern reversal stimuli: A MEG study supported by fMRI constraint. Neuroimage 2007; 35: 1152-1167.