Residential context, migration and fertility in a modern urban society

Advances in Life Course Research

Volumn 21, Issue , 2014, Pages 168-182

  Kulu, Hill ^a   Washbrook, Elizabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Event history analysis; Fertility; Migration; Residential context; UK

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH RATE; DEMOGRAPHY; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRATION; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SUBURBAN POPULATION; UNITED KINGDOM; URBAN POPULATION; VITAL STATISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH RATE; EMIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SUBURBAN POPULATION; URBAN POPULATION; VITAL STATISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959264582     PISSN: 15694909     EISSN: 18796974     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Becker G.S. A treatise on the family 1991, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
2. Boyle P.J., Graham E., Feng Z. Contextualising demography: The significance of local clusters of fertility in Scotland. MPIDR Working Paper WP-2007-036 2007, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock.
3. Brunetta G., Rotondi G. Urban and rural fertility in Italy: Regional and temporal changes. The geographical approach to fertility. Kieler Geographische Schriften 78 1991, 203-217. Geographisches Institut der Universität Kiel, Kiel. J. Bähr, P. Gans (Eds.).
4. Burcin B., Kučera T. Changes in fertility and mortality in the Czech Republic: An attempt of regional demographic analysis. New demographic faces of Europe 2000, 371-417. Springer, Berlin. T. Kučera, O. Kučerová, O. Opara, E. Schaich (Eds.).
5. Champion A.G. Urbanization, sub-urbanization, counterurbanization, and reurbanization. Handbook of urban studies 2001, 143-161. Sage, London. R. Paddison (Ed.).
6. Coleman D. New patterns and trends in European fertility: International and sub-national comparisons. Europe's population in the 1990s 1996, 1-61. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D. Coleman (Ed.).
7. Courgeau D., Pumain D. Sustained low fertility and spatial population distribution in France. Coping with sustained low fertility in France and the Netherlands 1993, 131-153. Swetz & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam. N. van Nimegen, J.-C. Chesnais, P. Dykstra (Eds.).
8. De Beer J., Deerenberg I. An explanatory model for projecting regional fertility differences in the Netherlands. Population Research and Policy Review 2007, 26:511-528.
9. Fagnani J. Fertility in France: The influence of urbanization. The geographical approach to fertility. Kieler Geographische Schriften 78 1991, 165-173. Geographisches Institut der Universität Kiel, Kiel. J. Bähr, P. Gans (Eds.).
10. Fiori F., Graham E., Feng Z. Geographical context and first birth in Britain. Paper presented at international conference on fertility over the life course 2012, University of Bremen.
11. Glusker A.I., Dobie S.A., Madigan D., Rosenblatt R.A., Larson E.H. Differences in fertility patterns between urban and rural women in Washington State 1983-1984 to 1993-1994. Women & Health 2000, 31(1):55-70.
12. Hank K. Regional fertility differences in Western Germany: An overview of the literature and recent descriptive findings. International Journal of Population Geography 2001, 7(4):243-257.
13. Heaton T.B., Lichter D.T., Amoateng A. The timing of family formation: Rural-urban differentials in first intercourse, childbirth, and marriage. Rural Sociology 1989, 54(1):1-16.
14. Hoem J.M. Statistical analysis of a multiplicative model and its application to the standardization of vital rates: A review. International Statistical Review 1987, 55(2):119-152.
15. Hoem J.M. Why does Sweden have such high fertility?. Demographic Research 2005, 13(22):559-572.
16. Hugo G., Champion A., Lattes A. Toward a new conceptualization of settlements for demography. Population and Development Review 2003, 29(2):277-297.
17. Kulu H. Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined. European Journal of Population 2005, 21(1):51-87.
18. Kulu H. Fertility of internal migrants: Comparison between Austria and Poland. Population, Space and Place 2006, 12(3):147-170.
19. Kulu H. Fertility and spatial mobility in the life-course: Evidence from Austria. Environment and Planning A 2008, 40(3):632-652.
20. Kulu H. Why do fertility levels vary between urban and rural areas?. Regional Studies 2013, 47(6):895-912.
21. Kulu H., Boyle P.J. High fertility in city suburbs: Compositional or contextual effects?. European Journal of Population 2009, 25(2):157-174.
22. Kulu H., Boyle P.J., Andersson G. High fertility in city suburbs: Evidence from four Northern European countries. Demographic Research 2009, 21(31):915-944.
23. Kulu H., Steele F. Interrelationships between childbearing and housing transitions in the family life course. Demography 2013, 50(5):1687-1714.
24. Kulu H., Vikat A. Fertility differences by housing type: The effect of housing conditions or of selective moves?. Demographic Research 2007, 17(26):775-802.
25. Kulu H., Vikat A., Andersson G. Settlement size and fertility in the Nordic countries. Population Studies 2007, 51(3):265-285.
26. Lillard L.A., Panis C.W.A. aML multilevel multiprocess statistical software, version 2.0 2003, EconWare, Los Angeles.
27. Livi-Bacci M.L., Breschi M. Italian fertility: An historical account. Journal of Family History 1990, 15(4):385-408.
28. McDonald P. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 2000, 26(3):427-439.
29. Michielin F. Lowest low fertility in an urban context: The role of migration in Turin, Italy. Population, Space and Place 2004, 10(4):331-347.
30. Milewski N. First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation?. Demographic Research 2007, 17(29):859-896.
31. Mulder C., Wagner M. The connection between family formation and first-time home ownership in the context of West Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population 2001, 17(2):137-164.
32. Snyder A.R. The role of contemporary family behaviors in nonmarital conception outcomes of nonmetro women: Comments on Albrecht and Albrecht (2004). Rural Sociology 2006, 71(1):155-163.
33. Snyder A.R., Brown S.L., Condo E.P. Residential differences in family formation: The significance of cohabitation. Rural Sociology 2004, 69(2):235-260.
34. Thygesen L.C., Knudsen L.B., Keiding N. Modelling regional variation of first-time births in Denmark 1980-1994 by an age-period-cohort model. Demographic Research 2005, 13(23):573-596.
35. Toulemon L. Fertility among immigrant women: New data, a new approach. Population and Societies 2004, 400.
36. Tromans N., Natamba E., Jefferies J. Have women born outside the UK driven the rise in UK births since 2001?. Population Trends 2009, 136:28-42.
37. Trovato F., Grindstaff C.F. Decomposing the urban-rural fertility differential: Canada, 1971. Rural Sociology 1980, 45(3):448-468.
38. Vitali A., Billari F.C. A spatial panel analysis of Italian regional fertility. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the PAA 2011.
39. Vojtěchovská P. Population development in Poland. New demographic faces of Europe 2000, 247-266. Springer, Berlin. T. Kučera, O. Kučerová, O. Opara, E. Schaich (Eds.).
40. Zakharov S.V., Ivanova E.I. Regional fertility differentiation in Russia: 1959-1994. Studies on Russian Economic Development 1996, 7(4):354-368.