Fertility of internal migrants: Comparison between Austria and Poland

Population, Space and Place

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 147-170

  Kulu, Hill ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Austria; Fertility; Intensity regression; Internal migration; Poland; Simultaneous equations

Indexed keywords

CHILDBEARING; FERTILITY; INTERNAL MIGRATION; POST-WAR; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

AUSTRIA; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; POLAND;

EID: 33744549809     PISSN: 15448444     EISSN: 15448452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/psp.406     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andersson G. 2004. Childbearing after migration: fertility patterns of foreign-born women in Sweden. International Migration Review 38(2): 747-774.
2. AOL (Amt der oberösterreichischen Landesregierung). 2003. Geburten- und Fruchtbarkeitsentwicklung in Oberösterreich 1960-1995. Amt der oberösterreichischen Landesregierung: Linz.
3. Baizan P, Aassve A, Billari FC. 2002. Institutional arrangements and life course outcomes: the interrelations between cohabitation, marriage and first birth in Germany and Sweden. MPIDR Working Paper 2002-026. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research: Rostock.
4. Bourdieu P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press: Stanford.
5. Brockeroff M. 1995. Fertility and family-planning in African cities: the impact of female migration. Journal of Biosocial Science 27(3): 347-358.
6. Brockeroff M, Yang XS. 1994. Impact of migration on fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa. Social Biology 41: 19-43.
7. Buber I, Prskawetz A. 2000. Current demographic trends in Austria. In New Demographic Faces of Europe, Kučera T, Kučerová O, Opara O, Schaich E (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 1-27.
8. Buckley C. 1995. The myth of managed migration: migration control and market in the Soviet period. Slavic Review 54: 896-916.
9. Carlson ED. 1985. The impact of international migration upon the timing of marriage and childbearing. Demography 22(1): 61-72.
10. Champion AG. 1993. Geographical distribution and urbanization. In The Changing Population of Europe, Noin D, Woods R (eds). Blackwell Publishers: Oxford; 23-37.
11. Champion AG. 2001. Urbanization, sub-urbanization, counterurbanization, and reurbanization. In Handbook of Urban Studies, Paddison R (ed). Sage Publications: London; 143-161.
12. Chesnais J-C. 1992. The Demographic Transition: Stages, Patterns, and Economic Implications. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
13. Clark WAV, Huang Y. 2004. Linking migration and mobility: individual and contextual effects in British housing markets. Regional Studies 38: 617-628.
14. Coleman D. 1996. New patterns and trends in European fertility: international and sub-national comparisons. In Europe's Population in the 1990's Coleman D (ed). Oxford University Press: Oxford; 1-61.
15. Courgeau D. 1989. Family formation and urbanization. Population: An English Selection 44: 123-146.
16. Duncan OD. 1965. Farm background and differential fertility. Demography 2: 240-249.
17. Easterlin RA. 1980. Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare. Basic Books: New York.
18. Farber SC, Lee BS. 1984. Fertility adaptation of rural-to-urban migrant women: a method of estimation applied to Korean women. Demography 21: 339-345.
19. Freedman R, Slesinger DP. 1961. Fertility differentials for the indigenous non-farm population of the United States. Population Studies 15: 161-173.
20. Fuchs I. 1997. Stadtregionen 1991 - das Konzept. Statistische Nachrichten 2: 76-83.
21. Goldberg D. 1959. The fertility of two-generation urbanites. Population Studies 12: 214-222.
22. Goldstein S. 1973. Interrelations between migration and fertility in Thailand. Demography 10: 225-241.
23. Goldstein S, Goldstein A. 1981. The impact of migration on fertility: an 'own children' analysis for Thailand. Population Studies 35: 265-281.
24. Hervitz HM. 1985. Selectivity, adaptation, or disruption? A comparison of alternative hypotheses on the effects of migration on fertility: the case of Brazil. International Migration Review 19: 293-317.
25. Hoem JM. 1975. Fertility and out-migration: reflections on research approaches in empirical investigations of the association between two demographic phenomena. Working Paper 1. University of Copenhagen, Laboratory of Actuarial Mathematics: Copenhagen.
26. Hoem JM. 1987. Statistical analysis of a multiplicative model and its application to the standardization of vital rates: a review. International Statistical Review 55: 119-152.
27. Hoem JM. 1993. Classical demographic models of analysis and modern event-history techniques. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 75. Stockholm University, Demography Unit: Stockholm.
28. Hoem JM. 1995. Harmless omission in the standardization of vital rates. European Journal of Population 11: 313-322.
29. Hoem JM, Neyer G, Prskawetz A. 2001a. Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effect of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria. MPIDR Working Paper 2001-016. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research: Rostock.
30. Hoem JM, Neyer G, Prskawetz A. 2001b. Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effect of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria. Population Studies 55: 249-261.
31. Holzer JZ, Kowalska I. 1997. Fertility and Family Surveys in Countries of the ECE Region: Standard Country Report, Poland. United Nations: New York.
32. Kahn JR. 1994. Immigrant and native fertility during the 1980s: adaptation and expectations for the future. International Migration Review 28: 501-519.
33. Katus K, Puur A, Pôldma A. 2002. Eesti pôlvkondlik rahvastikuareng [Population Development in Estonia across Generations]. Rahvastiku-uuringud D 2. Eesti Kôrgkoolidevaheline Demouuringute Keskus: Tallinn.
34. Kok H. 1999. Migration from the city to the country-side in Hungary and Poland. GeoJournal 49: 53-62.
35. Kreyenfeld M. 2002. Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women's education on second birth risks in West Germany. Demographic Research 7(2): 13-48.
36. Kreyenfeld M. 2004. Fertility decisions in the FRG and GDR: an analysis with data from the German Fertility and Family Survey. Demographic Research S3: 273-318.
37. Kulu H. 2003. Housing differences in the late Soviet city: the case of Tartu, Estonia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27: 897-911.
38. Kulu H. 2005. Migration and fertility: competing hypotheses re-examined. European Journal of Population 21(2): 51-87.
39. Kupiszewski M, Durham H, Rees P. 1998. Internal migration and urban change in Poland. European Journal of Population 14: 265-290.
40. Lee BS. 1992. The influence of rural-urban migration on migrant's fertility behavior in Cameroon. International Migration Review 26: 1416-1447.
41. Lee BS, Pol LG. 1993. The influence of rural-urban migration on migrants fertility in Korea, Mexico and Cameroon. Population Research and Policy Review 12: 3-26.
42. Lesthaeghe R, Neels K. 2002. From the first to the second demographic transition: an interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population 18: 325-360.
43. Lillard LA. 1993. Simultaneous equations for hazards: marriage duration and fertility timing. Journal of Econometrics 56: 189-217.
44. Lillard LA, Brien MJ, Waite LJ. 1995. Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital dissolution: a matter of self-selection. Demography 32(3): 437-457.
45. Lindstrom DP. 2003. Rural-urban migration and reproductive behavior in Guatemala. Population Research and Policy Review 22: 351-372.
46. Lutz W, Scherbov S, Hanika A. 2003. 'Vienna: a city beyond aging' - revisited and revised. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2003: 181-195.
47. Macisco JJ, Bouvier LF, Weller RH. 1970. The effect of labor force participation on the relation between migration status and fertility in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 48: 51-70.
48. Macura M, MacDonald AL. 2003. Fertility and fertility regulation in Eastern Europe: from the socialist to the post-socialist era. In Population of Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities, Kotowska IE, Jóźwiak J (eds). Statistical Publishing Establishment: Warsaw; 35-90.
49. Michielin F. 2004. Lowest low fertility in an urban context: the role of migration in Turin, Italy. Population, Space and Place 10: 331-347.
50. Mulder CH, Wagner M. 2001. The connection between family formation and first-time home ownership in the context of West Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population 17: 137-164.
51. Murphy MJ, Sullivan O. 1985. Housing tenure and family formation in contemporary Britain. European Sociological Review 1: 230-243.
52. Myers GC, Morris EW. 1966. Migration and fertility in Puerto Rico. Population Studies 20: 85-96.
53. Oláh LSz, Fratczak E. 2003a. Gendering family formation: first marriage and first birth in Hungary and Poland. In Population of Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities, Kotowska IE, Jóźwiak J (eds). Statistical Publishing Establishment: Warsaw; 219-249.
54. Oláh LSz, Fratczak E. 2003b. First and second births in first marriage in Hungary and Poland: a comparative analysis based on FFS-data. Paper presented at the European Population Conference 2003, Warsaw, Poland.
55. Prinz C, Lutz W, Nowak V, Pfeiffer C. 1998. Fertility and Family Surveys in Countries of the ECE Region: Standard Country Report, Austria. United Nations: New York.
56. Rosenwaite I. 1973. Two generations of Italians in America: their fertility experience. International Migration Review 7: 271-280.
57. Rundquist F-M, Brown LA. 1989. Migrant fertility differentials in Ecuador. Geografiska Annaler B71: 109-123.
58. Rykiel Z, Jazdzewska I. 2002. The maturing of the Polish urban system. In International Handbook of Urban Systems, Geyer HS (ed). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham; 271-294.
59. Statistik Austria. 2003. Ein Blick auf die Gemeinde. Statistik Austria: Wien.
60. Statistik Austria. 2004a. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2004. Statistik Austria: Wien.
61. Statistik Austria. 2004b. Wanderungsbilanz: 1934-1951, 1951-1961, 1961-1971, 1971-1981, 1981-1991, 1991-2001. http://www.statistik.at/ karten/themen.shtml.
62. Sauberer M. 1981. Migration and Settlement: 10. Austria. IIASA: Laxenburg.
63. Singley SG, Landale NS. 1998. Incorporating origin and process in migration-fertility frameworks: the case of Puerto Rican women. Social Forces 76: 1437-1464.
64. Stephen EH, Bean FD. 1992. Assimilation, disruption and the fertility of Mexican-origin women in the United States. International Migration Review 26: 67-88.
65. United Nations. 1999. The Demographic Yearbook Historical Supplement 1948-1997 CD-ROM (DYB-CD). United Nations: New York.
66. United Nations. 2002. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2001 Revision. United Nations: New York.
67. Vikat A. 1994. Family Formation in Estonia. Publications of the Finnish Demographic Society 15. Finnish Demographic Society: Helsinki.
68. Vikat A, Thomson E, Prskawetz A. 2004. Childrearing responsibility and stepfamily fertility in Finland and Austria. European Journal of Population 20: 1-21.
69. Vojtěchovská P. 2000. Population development in Poland. In New Demographic Faces of Europe, Kuœ̌ra T, Kuœ̌rová O, Opara O, Schaich E (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 247-266.
70. White ML, Moreno L, Guo S. 1995. The interrelation of fertility and geographic mobility in Peru: a hazards model analysis. International Migration Review 29: 492-514.