How many bits does it take for a stimulus to be salient?

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 07-12-June-2015, Issue , 2015, Pages 5501-5510

  Khatoonabadi, Sayed Hossein ^a   Vasconcelos, Nuno ^a   Bajić, Ivan V ^b   Shan, Yufeng ^c  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CISCO SYSTEMS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MARKOV PROCESSES; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; COMPUTER VISION APPLICATIONS; MARKOV RANDOM FIELD MODEL; SALIENCY MEASURE; STATE OF THE ART; VIDEO COMPRESSORS; VISUAL SALIENCY; VISUAL STIMULUS;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 84959190478     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299189     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. E. H. Adelson and J. R. Bergen. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am, 2(2):284-299, 1985.
2. G. Agarwal, A. Anbu, and A. Sinha. A fast algorithm to find the region-of-interest in the compressed MPEG domain. In Proc. IEEE ICME'03, volume 2, pages 133-136, 2003.
3. S. M. Anstis and D. M. Mackay. The perception of apparent movement [and discussion]. Philosophical Transac-tions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 290(1038):153-168, 1980.
4. F. Attneave. Informational aspects of visual perception. Psy-chological Review, 61:183-193, 1954.
5. H. Barlow. Cerebral cortex as a model builder. In Models of the Visual Cortex, pages 37-46, 1985.
6. H. Barlow. Redundancy reduction revisited. Network: Com-putation in Neural Systems, 12:241-253, 2001.
7. J. Besag. Spatial interaction and the spatial analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 36:192-236, 1974.
8. J. Besag. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 48:259-302, 1986.
9. A. Borji and L. Itti. State-of-the-art in visual attention modeling. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 35(1):185-207, 2013.
10. A. Borji, D. N. Sihite, and L. Itti. Quantitative analysis of human-model agreement in visual saliency modeling: A comparative study. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 22(1):55-69, 2013.
11. N. Bruce and J. Tsotsos. Saliency based on information maximization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys-tems, 18:155, 2006.
12. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley-Interscience, 2 edition, 2006.
13. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani. An introduction to the bootstrap, volume 57. CRC press, 1993.
14. Y. Fang, W. Lin, Z. Chen, C. M. Tsai, and C. W. Lin. A video saliency detection model in compressed domain. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 24(1):27-38, 2014.
15. D. Gao and N. Vasconcelos. On the plausibility of the discriminant center-surround hypothesis for visual saliency. Journal of Vision, 8, 7:1-18, 2008.
16. A. Garcia-Diaz, X. R. Fdez-Vidal, X. M. Pardo, and R. Dosil. Saliency from hierarchical adaptation through decorrelation and variance normalization. Image and Vision Computing, 30(1):51-64, 2012.
17. S. Geman and D. Geman. Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distribution and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 6(6):721-741, 1984.
18. H. Hadizadeh, M. J. Enriquez, and I. V. Bajíc. Eye-tracking database for a set of standard video sequences. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 21(2):898-903, Feb. 2012.
19. J. Harel, C. Koch, and P. Perona. Graph-based visual saliency. Advances in neural information processing sys-tems, 19:545-552, 2007.
20. D. Helbing and P. Molnar. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical review E, 51(5):4282-4286, 1995.
21. Y. Hochberg and A. C. Tamhane. Multiple comparison pro-cedures. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1987.
22. X. Hou and L. Zhang. Saliency detection: A spectral residual approach. In Proc. IEEE CVPR'07, pages 1-8, 2007.
23. X. Hou and L. Zhang. Dynamic visual attention: Searching for coding length increments. Advances in Neural Informa-tion Processing Systems, 21:681-688, 2008.
24. L. Itti. Automatic foveation for video compression using a neurobiological model of visual attention. IEEE Trans. Im-age Process., 13(10):1304-1318, 2004.
25. L. Itti and P. F. Baldi. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19:547-554, 2006.
26. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 20(11):1254-1259, 1998.
27. W. Kim, C. Jung, and C. Kim. Spatiotemporal saliency detection and its applications in static and dynamic scenes. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 21(4):446-456, 2011.
28. D. Knill and W. Richards. Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.
29. E. Kreyszig. Introductory mathematical statistics: principles and methods. Wiley New York, 1970.
30. S. Z. Li. Markov random field modeling in image analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
31. X. Li, H. Lu, L. Zhang, X. Ruan, and M. H. Yang. Saliency detection via dense and sparse reconstruction. In Proc. IEEE ICCV'13, pages 2976-2983, 2013.
32. Z. Liu, H. Yan, L. Shen, Y.Wang, and Z. Zhang. A motion attention model based rate control algorithm for H. 264/AVC. In The 8th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Com-puter and Information Science (ICIS'09), pages 568-573, 2009.
33. Y. F. Ma and H. J. Zhang. A new perceived motion based shot content representation. In Proc. IEEE ICIP'01, volume 3, pages 426-429, 2001.
34. Y. F. Ma and H. J. Zhang. A model of motion attention for video skimming. In Proc. IEEE ICIP'02, volume 1, pages 129-132, 2002.
35. V. Mahadevan, W. Li, V. Bhalodia, and N. Vasconcelos. Anomaly detection in crowded scenes. In Proc. IEEE CVPR'10, pages 1975-1981, 2010.
36. S. Mallat. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., Vol. 11:674-693, July 1989.
37. R. Margolin, A. Tal, and L. Zelnik-Manor. What makes a patch distinct? In Proc. IEEE CVPR'13, pages 1139-1146, 2013.
38. P. K. Mital, T. J. Smith, R. L. Hill, and J. M. Henderson. Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion. Cognitive Computation, 3(1):5-24, 2011.
39. B. Moulden, J. Renshaw, and G. Mather. Two channels for flicker in the human visual system. Perception, 13(4):387-400, 1984.
40. K. Muthuswamy and D. Rajan. Salient motion detection in compressed domain. IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 20(10):996-999, Oct. 2013.
41. A. Oliva and A. Torralba. Building the GIST of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in brain research, 155:23-36, 2006.
42. B. Olshausen and D. Field. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381:607-609, 1996.
43. D. J. Parkhurst and E. Niebur. Scene content selected by active vision. Spatial Vision, 16(2):125-154, 2003.
44. R. J. Peters, A. Iyer, L. Itti, and C. Koch. Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images. Vision Re-search, 45(18):2397-2416, 2005.
45. P. Reinagel and A. M. Zador. Natural scene statistics at the center of gaze. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 10:1-10, 1999.
46. N. Sebe and M. S. Lew. Comparing salient point detectors. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(1):89-96, 2003.
47. H. J. Seo and P. Milanfar. Static and space-time visual saliency detection by self-resemblance. Journal of Vision, 9(12):15, 2009.
48. A. Sinha, G. Agarwal, and A. Anbu. Region-of-interest based compressed domain video transcoding scheme. In Proc. IEEE ICASSP'04, volume 3, pages 161-164, 2004.
49. A. Srivastava, A. B. Lee, E. P. Simoncelli, and S. C. Zhu. On advances in statistical modeling of natural images. Journal of mathematical imaging and vision, 18(1):17-33, 2003.
50. C. Stauffer and W. Grimson. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. In Proc. IEEE CVPR'99, pages 246-252, 1999.
51. G. Sullivan, J. Ohm, W.-J. Han, and T. Wiegand. Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 22(12):1649-1668, 2012.
52. J. A. Swets. Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: Collected papers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1996.
53. R. Szeliski, R. Zabih, D. Scharstein, O. Veksler, V. Kolmogorov, A. Agarwala, M. Tappen, and C. Rother. A comparative study of energy minimization methods for Markov random fields. In Proc. ECCV'06, volume 2, pages 16-29, 2006.
54. B. W. Tatler, R. J. Baddeley, and I. D. Gilchrist. Visual correlates of fixation selection: Effects of scale and time. Vision Research, 45(5):643-659, 2005.
55. C. Wang, N. Komodakis, and N. Paragios. Markov random field modeling, inference & learning in computer vision & image understanding: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 117(11):1610-1627, 2013.
56. T. Wiegand, G. J. Sullivan, G. Bjontegaard, and A. Luthra. Overview of the H. 264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 13(7):560-576, 2003.
57. L. Zhang, M. H. Tong, T. K. Marks, H. Shan, and G.W. Cottrell. SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. Journal of Vision, 8(7), 2008.