Erratum:The source and credibility of colorectal cancer information on Twitter (Medicine (2016) 95: 7 (e2775) DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002775);The source and credibility of colorectal cancer information on twitter

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 95, Issue 7, 2016, Pages e2775-

  Park, Sohyun ^a   Oh, Heung Kwon ^b   Park, Gibeom ^a   Suh, Bongwon ^a   Bae, Woo Kyung ^b   Kim, Jin Won ^b   Yoon, Hyuk ^b   Kim, Duck Woo ^b   Kang, Sung Bum ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERNET; MACHINE LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; COLORECTAL TUMOR; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84959162800     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.md.0000482827.02221.a5     Document Type: Erratum

References (43)

1. Java, Akshay, Xiaodan Song, Tim Finin, and Belle Tseng. "Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities." In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, pp. 56-65. ACM, 2007.
2. Kwak, Haewoon, Changhyun Lee, Hosung Park, and Sue Moon. "What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?." In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pp. 591-600. ACM, 2010.
3. De Choudhury, Munmun, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Ryen W. White. "Seeking and sharing health information online: Comparing search engines and social media." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1365-1376. ACM, 2014.
4. Kaicker J, Debono VB, Dang W, et al. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC Med. 2010;8:59.
5. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2691-2700.
6. Chew C, Eysenbach G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PloS One. 2010;5:e14118.
7. Scanfeld D, Scanfeld V, Larson EL. Dissemination of health information through social networks: Twitter and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38:182-188.
8. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication, and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2009:e11.
9. Rajagopalan MS, Khanna VK, Leiter Y, et al. Patient-oriented cancer information on the Internet: a comparison of Wikipedia and a professionally maintained database. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7:319-323.
10. Oyeyemi SO, Gabarron E, Wynn R. Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: a dangerous combination? BMJ. 2014;349:g6178.
11. Wasserman M, Baxter N, Rosen B, et al. Systematic review of Internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:64-69.
12. Colon Cancer Coalition. Get your rear in gear. Colon Cancer Coalition. http://www.coloncancercoalition.org/. Last Accessed on 12/28/2015.
13. Twitter. The streaming APIs. 2015. Twitter Developers. https://dev.twitter.com/streaming/overview. Last Accessed on 12/28/2015.]
14. List of healthcare occupations. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List-of-healthcare-occupations. Last Accessed on 12/28/2015.
15. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27:237-246.
16. Carletta J. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Comput Ling. 1996;22:249-254.
17. Thackeray R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier C, et al. Using Twitter for breast cancer prevention: an analysis of breast cancer awareness month. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:508.
18. Segaran T. Programming Collective Intelligence: Building Smart Web 2.0 Applications. Boston, MA: O'Reilly Media; 2007.
19. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001;285:2612-2621.
20. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Cochand S, et al. Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:33-37.
21. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002;324:573-577.
22. Eysenbach G. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:356-371.
23. Narimatsu H, Matsumura T, Morita T, et al. Detailed analysis of visitors to cancer-related web sites. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4219-4223.
24. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e22.
25. Chou W-yS, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, et al. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e48.
26. Dredze M. How social media will change public health. IEEE Intell Syst. 2012;27:81-84.
27. Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research; 2013.
28. De la Torre-Diez I, Díaz-Pernas FJ, Antón-Rodríguez M. A content analysis of chronic diseases social groups on Facebook and Twitter. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18:404-408.
29. Sugawara Y, Narimatsu H, Hozawa A, et al. Cancer patients on Twitter: a novel patient community on social media. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:699.
30. Himelboim I, Han JY. Cancer talk on Twitter: community structure and information sources in breast and prostate cancer social networks. J Health Commun. 2014;19:210-225.
31. Lyles CR, López A, Pasick R, et al. "5 mins of uncomfyness is better than dealing with cancer 4 a lifetime": an exploratory qualitative analysis of cervical and breast cancer screening dialogue on Twitter. J Cancer Educ. 2013;28:127-133.
32. Murthy, Dhiraj, Alexander Gross, and Daniela Oliveira. "Understanding cancer-based networks in Twitter using social network analysis." In Semantic Computing (ICSC), 2011 Fifth IEEE International Conference on, pp. 559-566. IEEE, 2011.
33. Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Cheang C-W, et al. "What's happening?" A content analysis of concussion-related traffic on Twitter. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:258-263.
34. Shive M, Bhatt M, Cantino A, et al. Perspectives on acne: what Twitter can teach health care providers. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:621-622.
35. Laranjo L, Arguel A, Neves AL, et al. The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22:243-256.
36. Robillard JM, Johnson TW, Hennessey C, et al. Aging 2.0: health information about dementia on Twitter. PloS One. 2013;8:e69861.
37. Fiksdal AS, Kumbamu A, Jadhav AS, et al. Evaluating the process of online health information searching: a qualitative approach to exploring consumer perspectives. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e224.
38. Diviani N, van den Putte B, Giani S, et al. Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e112.
39. Janssens ACJ, Kraft P. Research conducted using data obtained through online communities: ethical implications of methodological limitations. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001328.
40. Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff. 2009;28:361-368.
41. Wangberg SC, Andreassen HK, Prokosch H-U, et al. Relations between Internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support, and subjective health. Health Promot Int. 2008;23:70-77.
42. Idriss, Shereene Z., Joseph C. Kvedar, and Alice J. Watson. "The role of online support communities: benefits of expanded social networks to patients with psoriasis." Archives of Dermatology 145, no. 1 (2009): 46-51.
43. Van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, et al. Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients' empowerment. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:61-69.