Global investigation of impacts of PET methods on simulating crop-water relations for maize

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 221, Issue , 2016, Pages 164-175

  Liu, Wenfeng ^a   Yang, Hong ^a,b   Folberth, Christian ^c,d   Wang, Xiuying ^e   Luo, Qunying ^f   Schulin, Rainer ^g  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e BLACKLAND RESEARCH AND EXTENSION CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^g ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Crop water relations; Global scale; Maize; Modelling uncertainties; PEPIC; PET

Indexed keywords

AGROMETEOROLOGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CROP YIELD; CULTIVATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FUTURE PROSPECT; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; GROWING SEASON; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; MAIZE; NUMERICAL METHOD; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; WATER AVAILABILITY; WATER MANAGEMENT; YIELD RESPONSE;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84959159611     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome.
2. Anothai J., Soler C.M.T., Green A., Trout T.J., Hoogenboom G. Evaluation of two evapotranspiration approaches simulated with the CSM-CERES-Maize model under different irrigation strategies and the impact on maize growth, development and soil moisture content for semi-arid conditions. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 176:64-76.
3. Baier W., Robertson G.W. Estimation of latent evaporation from simple weather observations. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1965, 45(3):276-284.
4. Balkovič J., et al. Pan-European crop modelling with EPIC: implementation, up-scaling and regional crop yield validation. Agrofor. Syst. 2013, 120:61-75.
5. Balkovič J., et al. Global wheat production potentials and management flexibility under the representative concentration pathways. Global Planet. C 2014, 122:107-121.
6. Bassu S., et al. How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors?. Global Change Biol. 2014, 20(7):2301-2320.
7. Batjes, N.H., 2006. ISRIC-WISE derived soil properties on a 5 by 5 arc-minutes global grid (version 1.1), ISRIC-World Soil Infromation, Wageningen.
8. Benson V., Potter K., Bogusch H., Goss D., Williams J. Nitrogen leaching sensitivity to evapotranspiration and soil water storage estimates in EPIC. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1992, 47(4):334-337.
9. Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., 2004. Water footprints of nations. Research Report Series No. 16. UNESCO-IHE, Delft.
10. Doorenbos J. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap. 1977, 24:15-29.
11. Elliott J., et al. Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111(9):3239-3244.
12. Elliott J., et al. The global gridded crop model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 2015, 8(2):261-277.
13. FAO Digital Soil Map of the World Map 1995, FAO, Rome.
14. FAO FertiSTAT- Fertilizer Use Statistics 2007, FAO, Rome.
15. Fader M., et al. Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations, and related water and land savings through trade. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15(5):1641-1660.
16. Folberth C., Gaiser T., Abbaspour K.C., Schulin R., Yang H. Regionalization of a large-scale crop growth model for sub-Saharan Africa: model setup, evaluation, and estimation of maize yields. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 151:21-33.
17. Folberth C., Yang H., Gaiser T., Abbaspour K.C., Schulin R. Modeling maize yield responses to improvement in nutrient, water and cultivar inputs in sub-Saharan Africa. Agric. Syst. 2013, 119:22-34.
18. Folberth C., et al. Effects of ecological and conventional agricultural intensification practices on maize yields in sub-Saharan Africa under potential climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9(4):044004.
19. Gassman, P.W. et al., 2005. Historical development and applications of the EPIC and APEX Models Iowa State University, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development. Working Paper 05-WP 397, Ames, Iowa.
20. Hargreaves G.H., Allen R.G. History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2003, 129(1):53-63.
21. Hargreaves G.H., Samani Z.A. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl. Eng. Agric. 1985, 1(2):96-99.
22. Hempel S., Frieler K., Warszawski L., Schewe J., Piontek F. A trend-preserving bias correction - the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst. Dyn. 2013, 4(2):219-236.
23. Jensen, M.E., Burman, R.D., Allen, R.G., 1990. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Requirements. ASCE Manual of Practice No. 70. ASCE, New York.
24. Jones J.W., et al. The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 18(3-4):235-265.
25. Kiniry J.R., Williams J.R., Gassman P.W., Debaeke P. A general, process-oriented model for two competing plant species. Trans. ASABE 1992, 35(3):801-810.
26. Knisel, W.G., 1980. CREAMS: a field-scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. Conservation Research Report No. 26, Washington D.C.
27. Leonard R.A., Knisel W.G., Still D.A. GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Trans. ASABE 1987, 30(5):1403-1418.
28. Liu J., Williams J.R., Zehnder A.J.B., Yang H. GEPIC-modelling wheat yield and crop water productivity with high resolution on a global scale. Agric. Syst. 2007, 94(2):478-493.
29. Liu J., Zehnder A.J.B., Yang H. Global consumptive water use for crop production: the importance of green water and virtual water. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45(5).
30. Liu J., et al. A global and spatially explicit assessment of climate change impacts on crop production and consumptive water use. PLoS One 2013, 8(2):e57750.
31. Liu J. A GIS-based tool for modelling large-scale crop-water relations. Environ. Modell. Software 2009, 24(3):411-422.
32. Mekonnen M.M., Hoekstra A.Y. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15(5):1577-1600.
33. Mitchell T.D., Jones P.D. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol. 2005, 25(6):693-712.
34. Monteith J. Evaporation and environment. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1965, 19:205-234.
35. Palosuo T., et al. Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: a comparison of eight crop growth models. Eur. J. Agron. 2011, 35(3):103-114.
36. Parton W.J., et al. A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Inc., Minneap. Minn. U. S. A. 1994, 147-167.
37. Peel M.C., Finlayson B.L., McMahon T.A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11(5):1633-1644.
38. Penman H.L. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1948, 193(1032):120-145.
39. Portmann F.T., Siebert S., Doll P. MIRCA2000 - Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: a new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2010, 24.
40. Priestley C., Taylor R. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon. Weather Rev. 1972, 100(2):81-92.
41. Ritchie J.T. Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour. Res. 1972, 8(5):1204-1213.
42. Roloff G., Jong R.D., Zentner R., Campbell C., Benson V. Estimating spring wheat yield variability with EPIC. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1998, 78(3):541-549.
43. Rosenzweig C., et al. The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 170:166-182.
44. Rosenzweig C., et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111(9):3268-3273.
45. Sacks W.J., Deryng D., Foley J.A., Ramankutty N. Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns. Global Change Biol. 2010, 19(5):607-620.
46. Saghravani S.R., ari Mustapha S., Ibrahim S., Randjbaran E. Comparison of daily and monthly results of three evapotranspiration models in tropical zone: a case study. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 5(6):698.
47. Sau F., Boote K.J., Bostick W.M., Jones J.W., Minguez M.I. Testing and improving evapotranspiration and soil water balance of the DSSAT crop models. Agron. J. 2004, 96(5):1243-1257.
48. Shiklomanov I.A. World Water Resources at the Beginning of the 21st Century 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Siebert S., Döll P. Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation. J. Hydrol. 2010, 384(3-4):198-217.
50. Tan G.X., Shibasaki R. Global estimation of crop productivity and the impacts of global warming by GIS and EPIC integration. Ecol. Modell. 2003, 168(3):357-370.
51. Trajkovic S. Hargreaves versus Penman-Monteith under humid conditions. J .Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2007, 133(1):38-42.
52. Wang K.C., Dickinson R.E. A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: observation, modeling climatology, and climatic variability. Rev. Geophys. 2012, 50.
53. Weedon G.P., et al. The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH forcing data methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50(9):7505-7514.
54. Williams J.R., Jones C.A., Dyke P.T. A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans. ASABE 1984, 27(1):129-144.
55. Williams J.R. The EPIC model. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995, Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, Colo. V.P. Singh (Ed.).
56. Xiong W., et al. A calibration procedure to improve global rice yield simulations with EPIC. Ecol. Modell. 2014, 273:128-139.
57. Yin Y.Y., et al. GEPIC-V-R model: a GIS-based tool for regional crop drought risk assessment. Agric. Water Manage. 2014, 144:107-119.
58. Yoder R.E., Odhiambo L.O., Wright W.C. Evaluation of methods for estimating daily reference crop evapotranspiration at a site in the humid Southeast United States. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2005, 21(2):197-202.