Histoimmunogenetics Markup Language 1.0: Reporting next generation sequencing-based HLA and KIR genotyping

Human Immunology

Volumn 76, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 963-974

  Milius, Robert P ^a   Heuer, Michael ^a   Valiga, Daniel ^a   Doroschak, Kathryn J ^a   Kennedy, Caleb J ^a   Bolon, Yung Tsi ^a   Schneider, Joel ^a   Pollack, Jane ^a   Kim, Hwa Ran ^b   Cereb, Nezih ^b   Hollenbach, Jill A ^c   Mack, Steven J ^d   Maiers, Martin ^a  

^a NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM   (United States)

^b Histogenetics LLC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OAKLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Data standards; Genotyping; HLA; HML; KIR; MIRING; NGS

Indexed keywords

HLA ANTIGEN; KILLER CELL IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIKE RECEPTOR; INWARDLY RECTIFYING POTASSIUM CHANNEL;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; DATA PROCESSING; EXON; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HISTOIMMUNOGENETICS; HISTOIMMUNOGENETICS MARKUP LANGUAGE 1.0; HUGO GENE NOMENCLATURE; HUMAN; IMMUNOGENETICS; MARKUP LANGUAGE; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE DATABASE; STANDARD; BIOLOGY; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY TEST; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE; STANDARDS;

ALLELES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY TESTING; HLA ANTIGENS; HUMANS; POTASSIUM CHANNELS, INWARDLY RECTIFYING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH REPORT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84959081370     PISSN: 01988859     EISSN: 18791166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2015.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Erlich H. HLA DNA typing: past, present, and future. Tissue Antigens 2012, 80:1-11.
2. Robinson J., Halliwell J.A., McWilliam H., Lopez R., Parham P., Marsh S.G.E. The IMGT/HLA database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D1222-D1227.
3. Voorter C.E.M., Mulkers E., Liebelt P., Sleyster E., van den Berg-Loonen E.M. Reanalysis of sequence-based HLA-A, -B and -Cw typings: how ambiguous is today's SBT typing tomorrow. Tissue Antigens 2007, 70:383-389.
4. Maiers M., Hurley C.K., Perlee L., Fernandez-Vina M., Baisch J., Cook D., et al. Maintaining updated DNA-based HLA assignments in the National Marrow Donor Program Bone Marrow Registry. Rev. Immunogenet. 2000, 2:449-460.
5. Hollenbach J.A., Mack S.J., Gourraud P.-A., Single R.M., Maiers M., Middleton D., et al. A community standard for immunogenomic data reporting and analysis: proposal for a STrengthening the REporting of Immunogenomic Studies statement. Tissue Antigens 2011, 78:333-344.
6. Helmberg W., Hegland J., Hurley C.K., Maiers M., Marsh S.G., Müller C., et al. Going back to the roots: effective utilisation of HLA typing information for bone marrow registries requires full knowledge of the DNA sequences of the oligonucleotide reagents used in the testing. Tissue Antigens 2000, 56:99-102.
7. S.J. Mack, R.M. Single, H.A. Erlich, G. Thomson, Proposal For HLA Data Validation, 2008. last accessed 29 January 2015. https://immport.niaid.nih.gov/docs/standards/Proposal_For_HLA_Data_Validation_Version_2.doc.
8. Immunogenomic Next Generation Sequencing Data Consortium. last accessed 29 January 2015. http://ngs.immunogenomics.org.
9. Mack S.J., Milius R.P., Gifford B.D., Sauter J., Hofmann J., Osoegawa K., et al. Minimum Information for Reporting Next Generation Sequence Genotyping (MIRING): guidelines for reporting HLA and KIR genotyping via next generation sequencing. Hum Immunol 2015, 76:954-962.
10. Taylor C.F., Field D., Sansone S.-A., Aerts J., Apweiler R., Ashburner M., et al. Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:889-896.
11. Maiers M. A community standard XML message format for sequencing-based typing data. Tissue Antigens 2007, 69:69-71.
12. Milius R.P., Mack S.J., Hollenbach J.A., Pollack J., Heuer M.L., Gragert L., et al. Genotype List String: a grammar for describing HLA and KIR genotyping results in a text string. Tissue Antigens 2013, 82:106-112.
13. Data Standards Hackathon for NGS based genotyping. last accessed 29 January 2015. http://dash.immunogenomics.org.
14. HL7 Implementation Guidance for Unique Object Identifiers (OIDs), Release 1 2009:1-34. last accessed 29 January 2015. http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/private/standards_temp_2E1D25F2-1C23-BA17-0C74CBDB29844F8B/v3/V3_OIDS_R1_INFORM_2011NOV.pdf.
15. Steindel S.J. OIDs: how can I express you? Let me count the ways. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2010, 17:144-147.
16. Rubinstein W.S., Maglott D.R., Lee J.M., Kattman B.L., Malheiro A.J., Ovetsky M., et al. The NIH genetic testing registry: a new, centralized database of genetic tests to enable access to comprehensive information and improve transparency. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D925-D935.
17. Gray K.A., Yates B., Seal R.L., Wright M.W., Bruford E.A. genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43:D1079-D1085.
18. Danecek P., Auton A., Abecasis G., Albers C.A., Banks E., DePristo M.A., et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:2156-2158.
19. Terry S.F. The global alliance for genomics & health. Genet. Test Mol. Biomarkers 2014, 18:375-376.
20. Global Alliance for Genomics & Health - Schemas for the Data Working Group. last accessed 29 January 2015. https://github.com/ga4gh/schemas.
21. James Kent W., Sugnet C.W., Furey T.S., Roskin K.M., Pringle T.H., Zahler A.M., et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 2002, 12:996-1006.
22. Cornish-Bowden A. Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequences: recommendations 1984. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13:3021-3030.
23. Eilbeck K., Lewis S.E., Mungall C.J., Yandell M., Stein L., Durbin R., et al. The Sequence Ontology: a tool for the unification of genome annotations. Genome Biol. 2005, 6:R44.
24. Flanagan S.E., Patch A.-M., Ellard S. Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet. Test Mol. Biomarkers 2010, 14:533-537.
25. Adzhubei I., Jordan D.M., Sunyaev S.R. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 2013.
26. Den Dunnen J.T., Antonarakis S.E. Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Hum. Mutat. 2000, 15:7-12.
27. Human Genome Society recommendations for the description of sequence variants. last accessed 29 January 2015. http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/recs.html.