Incorporating spatial regression model into cellular automata for simulating land use change

Applied Geography

Volumn 69, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-9

  Ku, Chia An ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cellular automata (CA); Integrated simulation framework; Land use simulation; Spatial regression

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LAND USE CHANGE; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; MAPPING; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84959063559     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agarwal C., Green G.M., Grove J.M., Evans T.P., Schweik C.M. A review and assessment of land-use change models: Dynamics of space, time, and human choice. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-297 2002, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, PA.
2. Anselin L. Spatial econometrics, methods and models 1988, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
3. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis 1995, 27:93-115.
4. Anselin L. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 2003, 26(issue):153-166. 10.1177/0160017602250972.
5. Apan A.A., Raine S.R., Paterson M.S. Mapping and analysis of changes in the riparian landscape structure of the lockyer valley catchment, queensland, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 59(1):43-57. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00246-8.
6. Baltzer H. Markov chain models for vegetation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 2000, 126:139-154. 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00262-3.
7. Berger T. Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: a simulation tool for technology diffusion, resource use changes and policy analysis. Agriculture Economics 2001, 25:245-260. 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00205.x.
8. Chang L.F., Lin C.H., Su M.D. Application of geographic weighted regression to establish flood-damage functions reflecting spatial variation. Water SA 2008, 34(2):209-216.
9. Clarke K.C., Gaydos L.J. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 1998, 12(7):699-714. 10.1080/136588198241617.
10. Clarke K.C., Hoppen S., Gaydos L.J. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1996, 24:247-261. 10.1068/b240247.
11. Dietzel C., Clarke K. The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems 2006, 30:78-101. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.04.001.
12. Dragicevic S., Marceau D.J., Marois C. Space time and dynamics modeling in historical GIS database: a fuzzy logic approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2001, 28(4):545-562. 10.1068/b2567.
13. Du Y., Ge Y., Lakhan V.C., Sun Y., Cao F. Comparison between CBR and CA methods for estimating land use change in Dongguan, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences 2012, 22(4):716-736.
14. Guan D., Gao W., Watari K., Fukahori H. Land use change of Kitakyushu based on landscape ecology and Markov model. Journal of Geographical Sciences 2008, 18:455-468. 10.1007/s11442-008-0455-0.
15. Hakan O., Klein A.G., Srinivasan R. Using the sleuth urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria CMSA. Journal of Social Sciences 2007, 2:72-82.
16. He C., Okada N., Zhang Q., Shi P., Li J. Modelling dynamic urban expansion processes incorporating a potential model with cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 86(1):79-91.
17. Jankowski P., Richard L. Integration of GIS-based suitability analysis and multicriteria evaluation in a spatial decision support system for route selection. Environment and Planning B 1994, 21:323. 323.
18. Jones R. A Review of land use/land cover and agricultural change models [R]. PIER energy-related environmental research. CEC-500-2005-056 2005, Stratus Consulting Inc. for the California Energy Commission.
19. Kamusoko C., Aniya M., Adi B., Manjoro M. Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe-simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov-cellular automata model. Applied Geography 2009, 29(3):435-447.
20. Lambin E.F., Turner B.L., Geist H.J., Agbola S.B., Angelsen A., Bruce J.W., et al. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global environmental change 2001, 11(4):261-269.
21. Lawler J.J., Lewis D.J., Nelson E., Plantinga A.J., Polasky S., Withey J.C., et al. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014, 111(20):7492-7497.
22. Li H., Reynolds J.F. Modeling effects of spatial pattern, drought, and grazing on rates of rangeland degradation: a combined Markov and cellular automaton approach. Scale in remote sensing and GIS 1997, 211-230. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton. D.A. Quattrochi, M.F. Goodchild (Eds.).
23. Martinez F.J. The bid-choice land-use model: an integrated economic framework. Environment and Planning A 1992, 24(6):871-885.
24. Meyfroidt P., Lambin E.F., Erb K.H., Hertel T.W. Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2013, 5(5):438-444.
25. Muller M.R., Middleton J. A Markov model of land-use change dynamics in the Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecology 1994, 9(2):151-157. 10.1007/BF00124382.
26. Pontius R.G., Malanson J. Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land change models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(2):243-265. 10.1080/13658810512331389445.
27. Rees W.G. Comparing the spatial content of thematic maps. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2008, 29(13):3833-3844. 10.1080/01431160701852088.
28. Silvertown J., Holtier S., Johnson J., Dale P. Cellular automaton models of interspecific competition for space-the effect of pattern on process. Journal of Ecology 1992, 527-533.
29. Syphard A.D., Clarke K.C., Franklin J. Using a cellular automaton model to forecast the effects of urban growth on habitat pattern in southern California. Ecological Complexity 2005, 2(2):185-203. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2004.11.003.
30. Tsou K.W., Chang Y.L. A spatial dynamic model for the study of urban land use change. Journal of Geographical Science 2004, 35:35-51. (In Chinese).
31. Veldkamp A., Fresco L.O. CLUE: a conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects. Ecological Modelling 1996, 85(2):253-270.
32. Waddell P. UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 2002, 68(3):297-314.
33. Wang S., Fang C., Ma H., Wang Y., Qin J. Spatial differences and multi-mechanism of carbon footprint based on GWR model in provincial China. Journal of Geographical Sciences 2014, 24(4):612-630.
34. Xie Y., Batty M. Integrated urban evolutionary modeling. GeoDynamics 2005, CRC Press, Boca Raton. P.M. Atkinson, G.M. Foody, S.E. Darby, F. Wu (Eds.).
35. Zhang Y., Li J., Chen Y.H. Simulation of Beijing urbanization using SLEUTH. Remote Sensing Information 2007, 2:50-54.
36. Zhao F., Chung S. A study of alternative land use forecasting models 2006, A report to FDOT Systems Planning Office, contract no. BD015-10. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/research-center/Completed_Proj/Summary_PL/FDOT_BD015_10_rpt.pdf.
37. Zhou B., Kockelman K.M. Predicting the distribution of households and employment: a seemingly unrelated regression model with two spatial processes. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17(5):369-376. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.09.003.