Predicting the distribution of households and employment: a seemingly unrelated regression model with two spatial processes

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 369-376

  Kockelman, Kara M ^b  

^a Brenda)   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Seemingly unrelated regression; Spatial distribution of households and employment; Spatial econometrics

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; AIR QUALITY; ECONOMETRICS; EMPLOYMENT; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; LAND USE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TRAVEL DEMAND;

AUSTIN; NORTH AMERICA; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67949112446     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models (1988), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
2. Anselin L. Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis 20 (1988) 1-17
3. Anselin L. Rao's score test in spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 97 (2001) 113-139
4. Anselin L. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 26 (2003) 153-166
5. Anselin, L., 2005. Exploring Spatial Data with GeoDa: a Workbook. https://geoda.uiuc.edu/pdf/geodaworkbook.pdf (retrieved June, 2006).
6. Anselin L., and Bera A. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah A., and Giles D.E.A. (Eds). Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics (1998), Marcel Dekker, New York 237-289
7. Anselin L., and Florax R.J.G.M. Small sample properties of tests for spatial dependence in regression models: some future results. In: Anselin L., and Florax R. (Eds). New Directions in Spatial Econometrics (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 21-74
8. Anselin L., Bera A.K., Florax R.J.G.M., and Yoon M.J. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26 (1996) 77-104
9. Boarnet M., Chalermpong S., and Geho E. Specification issues in models of population and employment growth. Papers in Regional Science 84 1 (2005) 21-46
10. Carruthers J.I., and Vias A.C. Urban, suburban, and exurban sprawl in the Rocky Mountain West: evidence from regional adjustment models. Journal of Regional Science 45 (2005) 21-48
11. Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG). http://www.capcog.org/Information_Clearinghouse/Orthoimagery_main.asp (retrieved June, 2005).
12. Case A. Spatial patterns in household demand. Econometrica 59 (1991) 953-965
13. Case A. Neighborhood influence and technological change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 22 (1992) 491-508
14. Case A., Rosen H.S., and Hines J.R. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: evidence from the States. Journal of Public Economics 52 (1993) 285-307
15. Clark D.E., and Murphy C.P. Countywide employment and population growth: an analysis of the 1980s. Journal of Regional Science 36 (1996) 235-256
16. Cressie N. Statistics for Spatial Data (1993), Wiley, New York
17. City of Austin, Land Use Survey Project Description. http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/landuse/lupd.htm (retrieved June, 2005).
18. Clark D.E., and Murphy C.A. Counrtywide employment and population growth: an analysis of the 1980s. Journal of Regional Science 36 (1996) 235-256
19. Cliff A., and Ord J.K. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications (1981), Pion, London
20. Das D., Kelejian H., and Prucha I. Finite sample properties of estimators of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive disturbances. Papers in Regional Science 82 (2003) 1-26
21. Deller S.C., Tsai T.H., Marcouiller D.W., and English D.B.K. The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agriculture Economics 83 (2001) 352-365
22. Florax R.J.G.M., and Rey S. The impacts of misspecified spatial interaction in linear regression models. In: Anselin L., and Florax R. (Eds). New Directions in Spatial Econometrics (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 111-135
23. Gallo, J.L., Dall'erba, S., 2003. Evaluating the temporal and the spatial heterogeneity of the European convergence process, 1980-1999. In: Presented at the 50th North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International (RSAI), Philadelphia, November 20-22, 2003.
24. Greene W. Econometric Analysis (2000), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
25. Haining R. Estimating spatial means with an application to remotely sensed data. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 17 (1988) 573-597
26. Henry M.S., Barkley D.L., and Bao S. The Hinterlands' stake in metropolitan growth: evidence from selected southern regions. Journal of Regional Science 37 (1997) 479-501
27. Kelejian H.H., and Prucha I.R. A generalized spatial two stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 17 (1998) 99-121
28. Kelejian H.H., and Prucha I.R. A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Economic Review 40 (1999) 509-533
29. Kelejian H.H., and Prucha I.R. Estimation of simultaneous systems of spatially interrelated cross sectional equations. Journal of Economics 118 (2004) 27-50
30. Kelejian H.H., and Robinson D.P. A suggested method of estimation for spatial independent models with autocorrelated errors, and an application to county expenditure model. Papers in Regional Science 72 (1993) 297-312
31. Kelejian H.H., and Robinson D.P. Spatial autocorrelation: a suggested alternative to the autoregressive model. In: Anselin L., and Florax R. (Eds). New Directions in Spatial Econometrics (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 75-93
32. Kockelman K.M. Travel behavior as a function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Record 1607 (1997) 117-125
33. Lundberg J. A spatial interaction model of spillovers from locally provided public services. Regional Studies 40 (2006) 631-644
34. 2. Journal of Econometrics 6 (1977) 381-387
35. Mulligan G.F., Vias A.C., and Glavac S.M. Initial diagnostics of a regional adjustment model. Environment and Planning A 31 (1999) 855-876
36. Rey S., and Montouri B. US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies 33 (1999) 143-156
37. Steinnes D.N., and Fisher W.D. An econometric model of interurban location. Journal of Regional Science 14 (1974) 65-80
38. Texas Natural Resource Information System (TNRIS). http://www.tnris.state.tx.us/DigitalData/doqs.htm (retrieved June, 2005).
39. Tobler W.R. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46 (1970) 234-240
40. Vias A.C., and Mulligan G.F. Integrating economic base theory with regional adjustment models: the nonmetropolitan Rocky Mountain West. Growth and Change 30 (1999) 507-525
41. Zhou B., and Kockelman K.M. Neighborhood impacts on land use change: a multinomial logit model of spatial relationships. Annals of Regional Science 42 (2008) 321-340