First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 740-750

  Aziz, Michael F ^a   Abrons, Ron O ^a   Cattano, Davide ^a   Bayman, Emine O ^b   Swanson, David E ^b   Hagberg, Carin A ^c   Todd, Michael M ^c   Brambrink, Ansgar M ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDEMA; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INJURY; INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPY; LIP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATION CONTROL; SORE THROAT; STRIDOR; TOOTH INJURY; TRACHEA INJURY; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; VIDEORECORDING; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; INJURIES; LARYNGOSCOPE; PATIENT; PHARYNX; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHETICS, GENERAL; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENTS; PHARYNX; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84958921270     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001084     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kaplan MB, Hagberg CA, Ward DS, Brambrink A, Chhibber AK, Heidegger T, Lozada L, Ovassapian A, Parsons D, Ramsay J, Wilhelm W, Zwissler B, Gerig HJ, Hofstetter C, Karan S, Kreisler N, Pousman RM, Thierbach A, Wrobel M, Berci G, Comparison of direct and video-Assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation. J Clin Anesth 2006 18 357 62
2. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA, Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005 52 191 8
3. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM, Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2012 116 629 36
4. Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Börgers A, Groeben H, Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2009 102 546 50
5. Teoh WH, Saxena S, Shah MK, Sia AT, Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC, Glidescope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2010 65 1126 32
6. Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM, Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology 2011 114 34 41
7. Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V, Moeller T, Scharf E, Wagner K, Bein B, Serocki G, First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg 2011 112 382 5
8. Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG, Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth 2008 101 723 30
9. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG, Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 2009 103 761 8
10. Maassen R, Lee R, Hermans B, Marcus M, van Zundert A, A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2009 109 1560 5
11. Cormack RS, Lehane J, Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984 39 1105 11
12. Lan KKG, DeMets DL, Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika 1983 70 659 63
13. O'Brien PC, Fleming TR, A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979 35 549 56
14. Newcombe RG, Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998 17 873 90
15. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT, Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Can J Anaesth 2012 59 41 52
16. Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dörges V, Cavus E, Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways. Minerva Anestesiol 2013 79 121 9
17. Turkstra TP, Harle CC, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, Cherry RA, Hoogstra J, Jones PM, The GlideScope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for GlideScope use. Can J Anaesth 2007 54 891 6
18. Konrad C, Schüpfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H, Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg 1998 86 635 9
19. Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, MacQuarrie K, Law JA, Pytka S, Imrie D, Field C, Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology 2003 98 23 7
20. Arné J, Descoins P, Fusciardi J, Ingrand P, Ferrier B, Boudigues D, Ariès J, Preoperative assessment for difficult intubation in general and ENT surgery: predictive value of a clinical multivariate risk index. Br J Anaesth 1998 80 140 6
21. Chin KJ, Arango MF, Paez AF, Turkstra TP, Palatal injury associated with the GlideScope. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007 35 449 50
22. Choo MK, Yeo VS, See JJ, Another complication associated with videolaryngoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2007 54 322 4
23. Cooper RM, Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 2007 54 54 7
24. Cross P, Cytryn J, Cheng KK, Perforation of the soft palate using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 2007 54 588 9
25. Dupanovic M, Maneuvers to prevent oropharyngeal injury during orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 2010 22 152 4
26. Hirabayashi Y, Pharyngeal injury related to GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007 137 175 6
27. Hsu WT, Hsu SC, Lee YL, Huang JS, Chen CL, Penetrating injury of the soft palate during GlideScope intubation. Anesth Analg 2007 104 1609 10
28. Leong WL, Lim Y, Sia AT, Palatopharyngeal wall perforation during Glidescope intubation. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008 36 870 4
29. Nestler C, Reske AP, Reske AW, Pethke H, Koch T, Pharyngeal wall injury during videolaryngoscopy-Assisted intubation. Anesthesiology 2013 118 709
30. Vincent RD Jr, Wimberly MP, Brockwell RC, Magnuson JS, Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 2007 19 619 21
31. Givol N, Gershtansky Y, Halamish-Shani T, Taicher S, Perel A, Segal E, Perianesthetic dental injuries: analysis of incident reports. J Clin Anesth 2004 16 173 6