L2 acquisition of pragmatic and syntactic constraints in the use of overt and null subject pronouns

Inquiries in Linguistic Development: In Honor of Lydia White

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 259-282

  Gürel, Ayşe ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958832401     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1075/z.133     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Bobaljik, J. (2000). The rich agreement hypothesis in review. Ms. McGill University.
2. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures in Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
3. Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding.
4. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language.New York,NY: Praeger.
5. Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H. (1995). Principles and parameters theory. In N. Chomsky (Ed.), The Minimalist Program (pp. 13-127). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6. Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R., & Anderson, B. (1997). The interpretative interface in L2 acquisition: The process-result distinction in English-French interlanguage grammars. Language Acquisition, 6(4), 297-332.
7. Enç, M. (1986). Topic switching and pronominal subjects in Turkish. In D. I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds.), Studies in Turkish Linguistics (pp. 195-208). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Enç, M. (1989). Pronouns, licensing, and binding. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 51-91.
9. Erguvanli-Taylan, E. (1986). Pronominal versus zero representation of anaphora in Turkish. In D. I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds.), Studies in Turkish Linguistics (pp. 209-231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. George, L. M. & Kornfilt, J. (1981). Finiteness and boundedness in Turkish. In F. W. Henry (Ed.), Binding and Filtering (pp. 105-127). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
11. Gürel, A. (2002). Linguistic Characteristics of Second Language Acquisition and First Language Attrition: Turkish overt versus null pronouns. PhD Dissertation, McGill University.
12. Haegeman, L. (1990). The nonovert subject in diary contexts. In J. Mascaró & M. Nespor (Eds.), Grammar in Progress (pp. 167-174). Dordrecht: Foris.
13. Hasegawa, N. (1985). On the so-called zero pronouns in Japanese. The Linguistic Review, 4, 289-341.
14. Huang, J. C.-T. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531-574.
15. Huang, J. C.-T. (1991). Remarks on the status of the null object. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar (pp. 56-76). Cambridge: CUP.
16. Huang, Y. (1995). On null subjects and null objects in generative grammar. Linguistics, 33, 1081-1123.
17. Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
18. Jaeggli, O. & Safir, K. J. (1989). The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli & K.J.Safir (Eds.), The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 1-45). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Kanno, K. (1997). The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers. Second Language Research, 13(3), 299-321.
20. Kornfilt, J. (1984). Case Marking, Agreement, and Empty Categories in Turkish. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.
21. Liceras, J. (1988). Syntax and stylistics: More on the pro-drop parameter. In S. Flynn & W. O'Neil (Eds.), Learnability and Second Languages: A book of readings (pp. 71-91). Dordrecht: Foris.
22. Liceras, J. (1989). On some properties of the pro-drop parameter: Looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In S. M. Gass & J. Schacter (Eds.), Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 109-133). Cambridge: CUP.
23. Manzini, R. M. & Wexler, K. (1987). Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3), 413-444.
24. Montalbetti, M. M. (1984). After Binding: On the interpretation of pronouns. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
25. Özsoy, A. S. (1987). The null subject parameter and Turkish. In H. E. Boeschoten & L. T. Verhoeven (Eds.), Studies on Modern Turkish. Proceedings of the Third Conference on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 82-90). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
26. Öztürk, B. (2001). Turkish as a non-pro-drop language. In E. Erguvanli-Taylan (Ed.), The Verb in Turkish (pp. 239-259). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Glass, W. R. (1997). OPC effects on the L2 acquisition of Spanish. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & W. R. Glass (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish (pp. 149-165). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
28. Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Glass, W. R. (1999). Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research, 15(2), 220-249.
29. Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax.New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.
30. Phinney, M. (1987). The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter Setting (pp. 221-238). Dordrecht: Reidel.
31. Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
32. Saito, M. & Hoji, H. (1983). Weak crossover and move in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1, 245-259.
33. Schwartz, B. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40-72.
34. Sheen, R. (2000). A response to Kanno's 'The stability of UG principles in second language acquisition: evidence from Japanese'. Linguistics, 38(4), 799-816.
35. Speas, M. (1994). Null arguments in a theory of economy of projection. In J. Runner & E. Benedicto (Eds.), Functional Projections [University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17] (pp. 179-208). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
36. Taraldsen, K. T. (1978). On the NIC, Vacuous application and that-trace filter. MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistic Club.
37. Thomas, M. (1993). Knowledge of Reflexives in a Second Language [Language Acquisition & Language Disorders 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Vainikka, A. & Levy, Y. (1999). Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory, 17, 613-671.
39. White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition & Language Disorders 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition: From initial to final state. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory (pp. 130-155). Oxford: Blackwell.
41. White, L., Bruhn-Garavito, J., Kawasaki, T., Pater, J., & Prévost, P. (1997). The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: Problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding. Language Learning, 47(1), 145-172.