Assessment of ptxD gene as an alternative selectable marker for Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation

Plant Cell Reports

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1121-1132

  Nahampun, Hartinio N ^a,d   López Arredondo, Damar ^b   Xu, Xing ^a,e   Herrera Estrella, Luis ^c   Wang, Kan ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b StelaGenomics Mexico S de RL de CV   (Mexico)

^c DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Mexico)

^d PTBISI International   (Indonesia)

^e ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Agrobacterium mediated transformation; Maize; Phosphite; Phosphite oxidoreductase; ptxD gene

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; GENETIC MARKER; NAD PHOSPHITE OXIDOREDUCTASE; OXIDOREDUCTASE; PHOSPHITE;

AGROBACTERIUM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE VECTOR; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MAIZE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

AGROBACTERIUM; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VECTORS; GENOTYPE; NADH, NADPH OXIDOREDUCTASES; PHOSPHITES; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; TRANSFORMATION, GENETIC; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84958818964     PISSN: 07217714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-016-1942-x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Armstrong CL, Green CE, Phillips RL (1991) Development and availability of germplasm with high type II culture formation response. Maize Genet Cooperative Newsl 65:92–93
2. Bevan M, Barnes WM, Chilton MD (1983) Structure and transcription of the nopaline synthase gene region of T-DNA. Nucl Acids Res 11(2):369–385
3. Block MD, Botterman J, Vandewiele M, Dockx J, Thoen C, Gosselé V, Movva NR, Thompson C, Montagu MV, Leemans J (1987) Engineering herbicide resistance in plants by expression of a detoxifying enzyme. EMBO J 6(9):2513–2518
4. Breyer D, Kopertekh L, Reheul D (2014) Alternatives to antibiotic resistance marker genes for in vitro selection of genetically modified plants—scientific developments, current use, operational access and biosafety considerations. Crit Rev Plant Sci 33(4):286–330
5. Christensen AH, Sharrock RA, Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Mol Biol 18(4):675–689
6. Chu CC (1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci Sin 18:659–668
7. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15
8. Frame B, Shou H, Chikwamba RK, Zhang Z, Xiang C, Fonger T, Pegg SE, Li B, Nettleton D, Pei D, Wang K (2002) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of maize embryos using a standard binary vector system. Plant Physiol 129(1):13–22
9. Frame B, McMurray J, Fonger T, Main M, Taylor K, Torney F, Paz M, Wang K (2006) Improved Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of three maize inbred lines using MS salts. Plant Cell Rep 25(10):1024–1034
10. Frame B, Main M, Schick R, Wang K (2011) Genetic transformation using maize immature zygotic embryos. In: Yeung E, Thorpe TA (eds) Plant embryo culture: methods and protocols. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC, New York, pp 327–341
11. Gadaleta A, Giancaspro A, Cardone MF, Blanco A (2011) Real-time PCR for the detection of precise transgene copy number in durum wheat. Cell Mol Biol Lett 16(4):652–668
12. Gendloff EH, Bowen B, Buchholz WG (1990) Quantitation of chloramphenicol acetyl transferase in transgenic tobacco plants by ELISA and correlation with gene copy number. Plant Mol Biol 14(4):575–583
13. Gordon-Kamm WJ, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ, Start WG, O’Brien JV, Chambers SA, Adams WR, Willetts NG, Rice TB, Mackey CJ, Krueger RW, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG (1990) Transformation of maize cells and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell 2(7):603–618
14. Hallauer AR, Lamkey KR, White PR (1997) Registration of five inbred lines of maize: B102, B103, B104, B105, and B106. Crop Sci, pp 1405–1406
15. Hobbs SLA, Warkentin TD, DeLong CMO (1993) Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression. Plant Mol Biol 21(1):17–26
16. Hood EE, Helmer GL, Fraley RT, Chilton MD (1986) The hypervirulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281 is encoded in a region of pTiBo542 outside of T-DNA. J Bacteriol 168(3):1291–1301
17. Ingham DJ, Beer S, Money S, Hansen G (2001) Quantitative real-time PCR assay for determining transgene copy number in transformed plants. BioTechniques 31(1):132–134, 136–140
18. Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nat Biotechnol 14(6):745–750
19. Ishida Y, Hiei Y, Komari T (2007) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize. Nat Protoc 2(7):1614–1621
20. Joersbo M, Okkels FT (1996) A novel principle for selection of transgenic plant cells: positive selection. Plant Cell Rep 16(3–4):219–221
21. Kanda K, Ishida T, Hirota R, Ono S, Motomura K, Ikeda T, Kitamura K, Kuroda A (2014) Application of a phosphite dehydrogenase gene as a novel dominant selection marker for yeasts. J Biotechnol 182–183:68–73
22. Karimi M, Inze D, Depicker A (2002) GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci 7(5):193–195
23. Knapp JE, Kausch AP, Chandlee JM (2000) Transformation of three genera of orchid using the bar gene as a selectable marker. Plant Cell Rep 19(9):893–898
24. Lopez-Arredondo DL, Herrera-Estrella L (2012) Engineering phosphorus metabolism in plants to produce a dual fertilization and weed control system. Nat Biotechnol 30(9):889–893
25. López-Arredondo DL, Herrera-Estrella L (2013) A novel dominant selectable system for the selection of transgenic plants under in vitro and greenhouse conditions based on phosphite metabolism. Plant Biotechnol J 11(4):516–525
26. Lucca P, Ye X, Potrykus I (2001) Effective selection and regeneration of transgenic rice plants with mannose as selective agent. Mol Breed 7(1):43–49
27. McDonald AE, Grant BR, Plaxton WC (2001) Phosphite (phosphorous acid): its relevance in the environment and agriculture and influence on plant phosphate starvation response. J Plant Nutr 24(10):1505–1519
28. Miki B, McHugh S (2004) Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants: applications, alternatives and biosafety. J Biotechnol 107(3):193–232
29. Min BW, Cho YN, Song MJ, Noh TK, Kim BK, Chae WK, Park YS, Choi YD, Harn CH (2007) Successful genetic transformation of Chinese cabbage using phosphomannose isomerase as a selection marker. Plant Cell Rep 26(3):337–344
30. Moose SP, Mumm RH (2008) Molecular plant breeding as the foundation for 21st century crop improvement. Plant Physiol 147(3):969–977
31. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473–497
32. Negrotto D, Jolley M, Beer S, Wenck AR, Hansen G (2000) The use of phosphomannose-isomerase as a selectable marker to recover transgenic maize plants (Zea mays L.) via Agrobacterium transformation. Plant Cell Rep 19(8):798–803
33. Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua NH (1985) Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Nature 313(6005):810–812
34. Ramessar K, Peremarti A, Gomes-Galera S, Naqvi S, Moralejo M, Munoz P, Capell T, Christou P (2007) Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics. Transgenic Res 16(3):261–280
35. Reed J, Privalle L, Powell ML, Meghji M, Dawson J, Dunder E, Sutthe J, Wenck A, Launis K, Kramer C, Chang YF, Hansen G, Wright M (2001) Phosphomannose isomerase: an efficient selectable marker for plant transformation. InVitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37(2):127–132
36. Shou H, Frame B, Whitham S, Wang K (2004) Assessment of transgenic maize events produced by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Mol Breed 13(2):201–208
37. Song P, Cai C, Skokut M, Kosegi B, Petolino J (2002) Quantitative real-time PCR as a screening tool for estimating transgene copy number in WHISKERS™-derived transgenic maize. Plant Cell Rep 20(10):948–954
38. van den Elzen PJM, Townsend J, Lee KY, Bedbrook JR (1985) A chimaeric hygromycin resistance gene as a selectable marker in plant cells. Plant Mol Biol 5(5):299–302
39. White J, Chang SY, Bibb MJ, Bibb MJ (1990) A cassette containing the bar gene of Streptomyces hygroscopicus: a selectable marker for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Research 18(4):1062
40. Zhao ZY, Gu W, Cai T, Tagliani L, Hondred D, Bond D, Schroeder S, Rudert M, Pierce D (2002) High throughput genetic transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens in maize. Mol Breed 8(4):323–333
41. Zhong GY, Peterson D, Delaney DE, Bailey M, Witcher DR, Register JC III, Diane B, Li CP, Marshall L, Kulisek E, Ritland D, Meyer T, Hood EE, Howard JA (1999) Commercial production of aprotinin in transgenic maize seeds. Mol Breed 5(4):345–356