Licensing in the Context of Entrepreneurial University Activity: an Empirical Evidence and a Theoretical Model

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-12

  Carayannis, Elias G ^a   Dubina, Igor N ^b   Ilinova, Alina A ^c  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ALTAI STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c SAINT PETERSBURG MINING UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Commercialization; Game theory; Innovation; Licensing; R D; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958766757     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18687873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-014-0234-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bousquet, A., Cremer, H., Ivaldi, M., & Wolkowicz, M. (1998). Risk sharing in licensing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 535–554.
2. Bremer, H. W. (1998). University technology transfer: evolution and revolution. Council on Government Relations.
3. Dubina, I. N. (2013). Game-theoretic models for organizing creativity and innovation in firms. Barnaul: Altai University (in Russian).
4. Erutco, C., & Richelle, Y. (2007). Optimal licensing contracts and the value of a patent. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 407–436.
5. Gallini, N. T., & Winter, R. A. (1985). Licensing in the theory of innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(2), 237–252.
6. Gallini, N. T., & Wright, B. D. (1990). Technology transfer under asymmetric information. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 147–160.
7. Haller, H., & Pavlopoulos, A. (2002). Technological failure, economic success. International Game Theory Review, 4(4), 415–434.
8. Harvey, M., & Lukas, L. (1996). Intellectual property right protection: what MNC managers should know about GATT. Multinational Business Review, 4(1), 77–93.
9. Jelnov, A., & Tauman, Y. (2009). The private value of a patent: a cooperative approach. Mathematical Social Sciences, 58, 84–97.
10. Kamien, M. I., & Tauman, Y. (1986). Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 471–491.
11. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986). How to license intangible property. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 567–589.
12. Mukherjee, A., & Balasubramanian, N. (2001). Technology transfer in a horizontally differentiated product market. Research in Economics, 55, 257–274.
13. OTC (Office of Technology Commercialization) presentation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2010. http://otc.umd.edu/sites/default/files/documents/about-otc-2010.pdf.
14. OTC (Office of Technology Commercialization) Statistics, University of Maryland, College Park, 2014. http://www.otc.umd.edu/about/statistics.
15. Sen, D. (2005). Fee versus royalty reconsidered. Games and Economic Behavior, 53, 141–147.
16. Sen, D., & Tauman, Y. (2007). General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation. Games and Economic Behavior, 59, 163–186.
17. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: university spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
18. Speser, P. (2006). The art and science of technology transfer. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
19. Tauman, Y., & Watanabe, N. (2007). The Shapley value of a patent licensing game: the asymptotic equivalence to non-cooperative results. Economic Theory, 30, 135–149.
20. Thurow, L.C. (1997). Needed: a new system of intellectual property rights. Harvard Business Review, September-October, pp. 94–103.
21. Tieckelman, R., Kordal, R., & Sanga, A. (2010). AUTM licensing activity survey FY2008: survey summary. Deerfield, Ill.: Association of University Technology Managers.