Testing for Granger Causality in the Frequency Domain: A Phase Resampling Method

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 53-66

  Liu, Siwei ^a   Molenaar, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Frequency domain; generalized partial directed coherence; Granger causality; partial directed coherence; vector autoregressive model

Indexed keywords

EFFECT SIZE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; BRAIN; CHILD; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; CHILD; CLINICAL STUDIES AS TOPIC; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84958757160     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1100528     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. F.Babiloni,, F.Cincotti,, C.Babiloni,, F.Carducci,, D.Mattia,, L.Astolfi,, & B.He, (2005). Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function. NeuroImage, 24(1), 118–131. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.036
2. L.A.Baccalá,, & F.de Medicina, (2007). Generalized partial directed coherence. Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, Cardiff, UK.
3. L.A.Baccalá,, & K.Sameshima, (2001). Partial directed coherence: A new concept in neural structure determination. Biological Cybernetics, 84(6), 463–474. doi:10.1007/PL00007990
4. L.A.Baccalá,, D.Y.Takahashi,, & K.Sameshima, (2006). Computer intensive testing for the influence between time series. In B.Schelter, M.Winterhalder, & J.Timmer (Eds.), Handbook of time series analysis: Recent theoretical developments and applications (pp. 411–436). Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
5. S.M.Boker,, J.L.Rotondo,, M.Xu,, & K.King, (2002). Windowed cross-correlation and peak picking for the analysis of variability in the association between behavioral time series. Psychological Methods, 7(3), 338–355. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.3.338
6. W.Boucsein, (1992). Electrodermal activity. New York, NY: Plenum.
7. S.-M.Chow,, K.Grimm,, F.Fujita,, & N.Ram, (2007). Exploring cyclic change in emotion using item response models and frequency domain analysis. In A.D.Ong & M.H.M.V.Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 362–379). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. R.Coleman,, M.Greenblatt,, & H.C.Solomon, (1956). Physiological evidence of rapport during psychotherapeutic interviews. Diseases of the Nervous System, 17(3), 71–77.
9. M.E.Dawson,, A.M.Schell,, & D.L.Filion, (2007). The electrodermal system. In J.T.Cacioppo, L.G.Tassinary, & G.G.Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 159–181). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. D.A.Dickey,, & W.A.Fuller, (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
11. A.DiMasco,, R.Boyd,, & M.Greenblatt, (1957). Physiological correlates of tension and antagonism during psychotherapy: A study of interpersonal physiology. Psychosomatic Medicine, 19(2), 99–104.
12. A.DiMasco,, R.Boyd,, M.Greenblatt,, & H.Solomon, (1955). The psychiatric interview: A sociophysiologic study. Diseases of the Nervous System, 16, 4–9.
13. M.Ding,, Y.Chen,, & S.L.Bressler, (2006). Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience. In B.Schelter, M.Winterhalder, & J.Timmer (Eds.), Handbook of time series analysis: Recent theoretical developments and applications (pp. 437–460). Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
14. E.Ferrer,, & J.R.Nesselroade, (2003). Modeling affective processes in dyadic relations via dynamic factor analysis. Emotion, 3(4), 344–360. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.344
15. R.Goebel,, A.Roebroeck,, D.-S.Kim,, & E.Formisano, (2003). Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 21(10), 1251–1261. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.026
16. J.M.Gottman,, & J.T.Ringland, (1981). The analysis of dominance and bidirectionality in social development. Child Development, 52(2), 393–412. doi:10.2307/1129157
17. C.W.J.Granger, (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. doi:10.2307/1912791
18. E.L.Hamaker,, C.V.Dolan,, & P.C.M.Molenaar, (2005). Statistical modeling of the individual: Rationale and application of multivariate stationary time series analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(2), 207–233. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_3
19. J.Huang,, J.-Y.Chang,, D.J.Woodward,, L.A.Baccalá,, J.-S.Han,, J.-Y.Wang,, & F.Luo, (2006). Dynamic neuronal responses in cortical and thalamic areas during different phases of formalin test in rats. Experimental Neurology, 200(1), 124–134. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.01.036
20. M.Kamiński,, M.Ding,, W.A.Truccolo,, & S.L.Bressler, (2001). Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biological Cybernetics, 85(2), 145. doi:10.1007/s004220000235
21. B.Kocsis,, & M.Kaminski, (2006). Dynamic changes in the direction of the theta rhythmic drive between supramammillary nucleus and the septohippocampal system. Hippocampus, 16(6), 531–540. doi:10.1002/hipo.20180
22. E.D.Kolaczyk, (2009). Descriptive analysis of network graph characteristics. In E. D. Kolaczyk (Ed.), Statistical analysis of network data: Methods and models (pp. 79–122). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-88146-1_4
23. B.M.Lester,, J.Hoffman,, & T.B.Brazelton, (1985). The rhythmic structure of mother-infant interaction in term and preterm infants. Child Development, 56(1), 15–27. doi:10.2307/1130169
24. S.Liu,, & P.C.M.Molenaar, (2014). iVAR: A program for imputing missing data in multivariate time series using vector autoregressive models. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1138–1148. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0444-4
25. S.Liu,, P.C.M.Molenaar,, M.J.Rovine,, & M.S.Goodwin, (2012). Time-frequency analysis for modeling physiological dynamics in dyadic interactions. Paper presented at the Society of Research in Child Development Developmental Methodology Themed Meeting, Tampa, FL.
26. H.Lütkepohl, (2006). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
27. B.Pfaff, (2008). Non-stationary time series. In B. Pfaff (Ed.), Analysis of integrated and cointegrated time series with R (pp. 53–71). New York, NY: Springer.
28. N.Ram,, S.-M.Chow,, R.Bowles,, L.Wang,, K.Grimm,, F.Fujita,, & J.Nesselroade, (2005). Examining interindividual differences in cyclicity of pleasant and unpleasant affects using spectral analysis and item response modeling. Psychometrika, 70(4), 773–790. doi:10.1007/s11336-001-1270-5
29. P.Sadler,, N.Ethier,, G.R.Gunn,, D.Duong,, & E.Woody, (2009). Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns during interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1005–1020. doi:10.1037/a0016232
30. A.Schlögl, (2007). EEG coupling, Granger causality and multivariate autoregressive models. Paper presented at the PASCAL Workshop on Methods of Data Analysis in Computational Neuroscience and Brain Computer Interfaces, Berlin, Germany.
31. A.Schlögl,, & G.Supp, (2006). Analyzing event-related EEG data with multivariate autoregressive parameters. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 135–147. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59009-0
32. D.Y.Takahashi,, L.A.Baccalá,, & K.Sameshima, (2007). Connectivity inference between neural structures via partial directed coherence. Journal of Applied Statistics, 34(10), 1259–1273. doi:10.1080/02664760701593065
33. S.Wasserman,, & K.Faust, (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Y.Zheng,, R.P.Wiebe,, H.H.Cleveland,, P.C.M.Molenaar,, & K.S.Harris, (2013). An idiographic examination of day-to-day patterns of substance use craving, negative affect, and tobacco use among young adults in recovery. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(2), 241–266. doi:10.1080/00273171.2013.763012