Patients experiences of involvement in choice of dialysis mode

Journal of Renal Care

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 260-267

  Erlang, Anne S ^a   Nielsen, Ida H ^a   Hansen, Helle O B ^a   Finderup, Jeanette ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Dialysis choice; Experience; Involvement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RENAL DIALYSIS;

EID: 84958748762     PISSN: 17556678     EISSN: 17556686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12141     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Charles C., Gafni A. & Whelan T. ( 1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine 5, 681-692.
2. Covic A., Bammens B., Lobbedez T. et al. ( 2010). Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 25, 1757-1759.
3. Harwood L. & Clark A.M. ( 2013). Understanding pre-dialysis modality decision-making: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies 50, 109-120.
4. Jager K.J., Karevaar J.C., Dekker F.W. et al. ( 2004). The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 43, 891-899.
5. Johansson L. ( 2013). Shared decision making and patient involvement in choosing home therapies. Journal of Renal Care 39, 9-15.
6. King K. ( 2000). Patients' perspectives of factors affecting modality selection: a National Kidney Foundation patient survey. Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy 7, 261-268.
7. Kvale S. & Brinkmann S.( 2009). Inter views: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
8. Landreneau K.J. & Ward-Smith P. ( 2007). Perceptions of adult patients on hemodialysis concerning choice among renal replacement therapies. Nephrology Nursing Journal 34, 513-525.
9. Laverty S.M. ( 2003). Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: a comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2, 3.
10. Lee A. Gudex C., Povlsen J.V. et al. ( 2008). Patients' views regarding choice of dialysis modality. Nehprology Dialysis Transplantation 23, 3953-3959.
11. Légaré F., Ratté S., Stacey D. et al. ( 2010). Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 12, 1-47.
12. Levey A.S. & Coresh J. ( 2012). Chronic kidney disease. Lancet 379, 165-180.
13. Malterud K. ( 2012). Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 40, 789-805.
14. Morton R.L., Devitt J., Howard K. et al. ( 2010a). Patient Views About Treatment of Stage 5 CKD: A Qualitative Analysis of Semistructured Interviews. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 55, 431-440.
15. Morton R.L., Tong A., Howard K. et al. ( 2010b). The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition) 340, 112.
16. Murray M.A., Bissonnette J., Kryworuchko J. et al. ( 2013). Whose choice is it? Shared decision making in nephology care. Seminars In Dialysis 26, 169-174.
17. Murray M.A., Brunier G., Chung J.O. et al. ( 2009). A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease. Patient Education & Counseling 76, 149-158.
18. National Board of Health. ( 2006). Dialysis in Chronic Renal Failure - a Health Technology Assessment. Available: http://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/publ/publ2006/CEMTV/Dialyse/dialyse_en_sum.pdf. Last accessed 12.02.15.
19. National Kidney Foundation. ( 2006a). Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy. Clinical Practice Guidelines and Recommendations 16-60.
20. National Kidney Foundation. ( 2006b). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy. Clinical Practice Guidelines and Recommendations 27-166.
21. National Kidney Foundation. ( 2002). KDOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39, 1-206.
22. O'Donoghue D. & Richards M. ( 2009). End of life care in advanced kidney disease: a framework for implementation. National Health Services (NHS) 1-10.
23. Paterson B. ( 2001). The Shifting Perspectives Model of Chronic Illness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship vol 31, 21-26.
24. Stack A. & Martin D. ( 2005). Association of patient autonomy with increased transplantation and survival among new dialysis patients in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 45, 730-42.
25. Stacey D. et al. ( 2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (10), 1-215.
26. The Joanna Briggs Institute ( 2011) Section 2-Qualitative Evidence. Joanna Briggs Institute - Reviewers' Manual - Edition 2011. Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute, pp. 17-44.
27. Thompson A. ( 2007). The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy. Social Science & Medicine 64, 1297-1310.
28. Tweed A.E. & Ceaser K. ( 2005). Renal replacement therapy choices for pre-dialysis renal patients. British Journal of Nursing 14, 659-664.
29. World Medical Association. ( 2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available: file:///C:/Users/Ida %20Hamborg/Downloads/jsc130006.pdf Last accessed 12.02.15.