Practical guide to the Idea, Development and Exploration stages of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 103, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 607-615

  Pennell, C P ^a   Hirst, A D ^c   Campbell, W B ^d   Sood, A ^b   Agha, R A ^e   Barkun, J S T ^f   McCulloch, P ^c  

^a MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^e GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SURGERY;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 84958652329     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10115     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, Maddern GJ, Strasberg SM,;, Balliol Collaboration. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet 2009; 374: 1089-1096.
2. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009; 374: 1105-1112.
3. Currie A, Brigic A, Blencowe NS, Potter S, Faiz OD, Kennedy RH, et al. Systematic review of surgical innovation reporting in laparoendoscopic colonic polyp resection. Br J Surg 2015; 102: e108-e116.
4. Diez Del Val I, Loureiro C, McCulloch P. The IDEAL prospective development study format for reporting surgical innovations. An illustrative case study of robotic oesophagectomy. Int J Surg 2015; 19: 104-111.
5. Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Autorino R, Crouzet S, Ouzzane A, Flamand V, et al. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 1033-1043.
6. Sood A, Ghani KR, Ahlawat R, Modi P, Abaza R, Jeong W, et al. Application of the statistical process control method for prospective patient safety monitoring during the learning phase: robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia (IDEAL phase 2a-b). Eur Urol 2014; 66: 371-378.
7. Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Dickinson L, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Sahu M, et al. Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 622-632.
8. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014; 348: g1687.
9. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194.
10. Valerio M, Dickinson L, Ali A, Ramachandran N, Donaldson I, Freeman A, et al. A prospective development study investigating focal irreversible electroporation in men with localised prostate cancer: Nanoknife Electroporation Ablation Trial (NEAT). Contemp Clin Trials 2014; 39: 57-65.
11. Agha R, Rosin D. The Research Registry-answering the call to register every research study involving human participants. Int J Surg 2015; 16 (Pt A): 113-115.
12. Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014; 383: 166-175.
13. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative. http://www.comet-initiative.org [accessed 20 May 2015].
14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213.
15. Martin RCG, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 803-813.
16. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 177-186.
17. Fageeh W, Raffa H, Jabbad H, Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 76: 245-251.
18. legislation.gov.uk. The Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations; 2012. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1743/made [accessed 16 December 2015].
19. Brännström M, Johannesson L, Dahm-Kähler P, Enskog A, Mölne J, Kvarnström N, et al. First clinical uterus transplantation trial: a six-month report. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 1228-1236.
20. Menon M, Sood A, Bhandari M, Kher V, Ghosh P, Abaza R, et al. Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: a step-by-step description of the Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta technique (IDEAL phase 2a). Eur Urol 2014; 65: 991-1000.
21. Barentsz MW, Verkooijen HM, Pijnappel RM, Fernandez MA, van Diest PJ, van der Pol CC, et al. Sentinel lymph node localization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and an I-125 seed: an IDEAL prospective development study. Int J Surg 2015; 14: 1-6.
22. British Society of Interventional Radiology. UK-ROPE (Registry of Prostate Embolisation). http://www.bsir.org/registries/uk-rope-registry-of-prostate-embolisation [accessed 30 April 2015].
23. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 2009; 374: 1097-1104.
24. Biau DJ, Williams SM, Schlup MM, Nizard RS, Porcher R. Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve using LC-CUSUM. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 925-929.
25. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Soldati T, Danese F, Calvo F. Morbidity and mortality after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group prospective multicenter surgical study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 1490-1493.
26. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Calvo F. Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 1727-1732.
27. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Calgaro M, Garino M, Rebecchi F, Mineccia M, et al. Morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 gastrectomy for cancer: interim analysis of the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group (IGCSG) randomised surgical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30: 303-308.
28. Chapman SJ, Shelton B, Mahmood H, Fitzgerald JE, Harrison EM, Bhangu A. Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study. BMJ 2014; 349: g6870.
29. Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, et al. Quality improvement report: improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult. BMJ 2002; 325: 766-770.
30. Rogers CA, Welbourn R, Byrne J, Donovan JL, Reeves BC, Wordsworth S, et al. The By-Band study: gastric bypass or adjustable gastric band surgery to treat morbid obesity: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot phase. Trials 2014; 15: 53.