Protocol-based verification of message-passing parallel programs

Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA

Volumn 25-30-Oct-2015, Issue , 2015, Pages 280-298

  López, Hugo A ^a   Marques, Eduardo R B ^b   Martins, Francisco ^b   Ng, Nicholas ^c   Santos, César ^b   Vasconcelos, Vasco Thudichum ^b   Yoshida, Nobuko ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dependent types; MPI; Parallel programming; Program verification; Session types

Indexed keywords

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; MESSAGE PASSING; MODEL CHECKING; PARALLEL PROGRAMMING; VERIFICATION;

DEPENDENT TYPE SYSTEM; DEPENDENT TYPES; MESSAGE PASSING INTERFACE; MESSAGE-PASSING PARALLEL PROGRAMS; PROGRAM VERIFICATION; PROTOCOL SPECIFICATIONS; SESSION TYPES; STATE EXPLOSION PROBLEMS;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84958631303     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2814270.281430     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. S. Aananthakrishnan, G. Bronevetsky, and G. Gopalakrishnan. Hybrid approach for data-flow analysis of MPI programs. In ICS, pages 455-456. ACM, 2013.
2. E. Cohen, M. Dahlweid, M. Hillebrand, D. Leinenbach, M. Moskal, T. Santen, W. Schulte, and S. Tobies. VCC: A practical system for verifying concurrent C. In TPHOLs, volume 5674 of LNCS, pages 23-42. Springer, 2009.
3. T. Coquand. Logical Frameworks, chapter An algorithm for testing conversion in type theory. CUP, 1991.
4. L. M. de Moura and N. Bjørner. Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In TACAS, volume 4963 of LNCS, pages 337-340. Springer, 2008.
5. P. Deniflou, N. Yoshida, A. Bejleri, and R. Hu. Parameterised multiparty session types. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 8(4), 2012.
6. V. Forejt, D. Kroening, G. Narayanswamy, and S. Sharma. Precise predictive analysis for discovering communication deadlocks in MPI programs. In FM, volume 8442 of LNCS, pages 263-278. Springer, 2014.
7. M. Forum. MPI: A Message-Passing Interface Standard-Version 3.0. High-Performance Computing Center Stuttgart, 2012.
8. I. Foster. Designing and building parallel programs. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
9. A. Georges, D. Buytaert, and L. Eeckhout. Statistically rigorous Java performance evaluation. In OOPSLA, pages 57-76. ACM, 2007.
10. G. Gopalakrishnan, R. M. Kirby, S. F. Siegel, R. Thakur, W. Gropp, E. Lusk, B. R. D. Supinski, M. Schulz., and G. Bron-Evetsky. Formal analysis of MPI-based parallel programs. CACM, 54(12):82-91, 2011.
11. A. D. Gordon and C. Fournet. Principles and applications of refinement types. In International Summer School Logics and Languages for Reliability and Security, pages 73-104. IOS Press, 2010.
12. W. Gropp, E. Lusk, and A. Skjellum. Using MPI: portable parallel programming with the message passing interface. Scientific and Engineering Computation series. MIT press, 1999.
13. T. Hilbrich, J. Protze, M. Schulz, B. R. de Supinski, and M. S. Muller. MPI runtime error detection with MUST: advances in deadlock detection. In SC, pages 30:1-30:11. IEEE/ACM, 2012.
14. K. Honda, N. Yoshida, and M. Carbone. Multiparty asynchronous session types. In POPL, pages 273-284. ACM, 2008.
15. K. Honda, A. Mukhamedov, G. Brown, T. Chen, and N. Yoshida. Scribbling interactions with a formal foundation. In ICDCIT, volume 6536 of LNCS, pages 55-75. Springer, 2011.
16. K. Honda, E. R. B. Marques, F. Martins, N. Ng, V. T. Vascon-celos, and N. Yoshida. Verification of MPI programs using session types. In Recent Advances in the Message Passing Interface, volume 7490 of LNCS, pages 291-293. Springer, 2012.
17. K. Honda, R. Hu, R. Neykova, T.-C. Chen, R. Demangeon, P.-M. Denielou, and N. Yoshida. Structuring communication with session types. In COB 2014, volume 8665 of LNCS, pages 105-127. Springer, 2014.
18. Y. Huang, E. Mercer, and J. McCarthy. Proving MCAPI executions are correct using SMT. In ASE, pages 26-36. IEEE, 2013.
19. D. Kouzapas, R. Gutkovas, and S. J. Gay. Session types for broadcasting. In PLACES, volume 155 of EPTCS, pages 25-31, 2014.
20. F. Lemos. Synthesis of correct-by-construction MPI programs. Master's thesis, Department of Informatics, University of Lisbon, 2014.
21. E. R. B. Marques, F. Martins, V. T. Vasconcelos, N. Ng, and N. Martins. Towards deductive verification of MPI programs against session types. In PLACES, volume 137 of EPTCS, pages 103-113, 2013.
22. P. Martin-Lof. Intuitionistic Type Theory. Bibliopolis-Napoli, 1984.
23. N. Ng and N. Yoshida. Pabble: parameterised Scribble. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, pages 1-16, 2014.
24. N. Ng, N. Yoshida, and K. Honda. Multiparty Session C: Safe parallel programming with message optimisation. In TOOLS Europe, volume 7304 of LNCS, pages 202-218. Springer, 2012.
25. N. Ng, J. G. Coutinho, and N. Yoshida. Protocols by default: Safe MPI code generation based on session types. In CC 2015, volume 9031 of LNCS, pages 212-232. Springer, 2015.
26. P. Pacheco. Parallel programming with MPI. Morgan Kauf-mann, 1997.
27. ParTypes. Partypes homepage. http://gloss.di.fc.ul.pt/ParTypes, July 2015.
28. S. Pervez, G. Gopalakrishnan, R. M. Kirby, R. Palmer, R. Thakur, and W. Gropp. Practical model-checking method for verifying correctness of MPI programs. In PVM/MPI, volume 4757 of LNCS, pages 344-353. Springer, 2007.
29. F. Pfenning and C. Elliot. Higher-order abstract syntax. SIGPLANNotices, 23(7):199-208, 1988.
30. P. M. Rondon, M. Kawaguchi, and R. Jhala. Liquid types. In PLDI, pages 159-169. ACM, 2008.
31. C. Santos, F. Martins, and V. T. Vasconcelos. Deductive verification of parallel programs using Why3. In ICE. EPCTS, 2015.
32. M. Schulz and B. R. de Supinski. A flexible and dynamic infrastructure for MPI tool interoperability. In ICPP, pages 193-202. IEEE, 2006.
33. Scribble. Scribble homepage. http://www.scribble.org/, July 2015.
34. T. Sheard and N. Linger. Programming in Omega. In CEFP, volume 5161 of LNCS, pages 158-227. Springer, 2007.
35. S. F. Siegel and G. Gopalakrishnan. Formal analysis of message passing. In VMCAI, volume 6538 of LNCS, pages 2-18. Springer, 2011.
36. S. F. Siegel and L. Rossi. Analyzing BlobFlow: A case study using model checking to verify parallel scientific software. In EuroPVM/MPI, volume 5205 of LNCS, pages 274-282. Springer, 2008.
37. S. F. Siegel and T. K. Zirkel. FEVS: A functional equivalence verification suite for high performance scientific computing. Mathematics in Computer Science, 5(4):427-435, 2011.
38. S. F. Siegel and T. K. Zirkel. Loop invariantsymbolic execution for parallel programs. In VMCAI, volume 7148 ofLNCS, pages 412-427. Springer, 2012.
39. S. F. Siegel, M. Zheng, Z. Luo, T. K. Zirkel, A. V. Marianiello, J. G. Edenhofner, M. B. Dwyer, and M. S. Rogers. CIVL: The Concurrency Intermediate Verification Language. In SC. IEEE, 2015.
40. A. Vo, S. Aananthakrishnan, G. Gopalakrishnan, B. R. de Supinski, M. Schulz, and G. Bronevetsky. A scalable and distributed dynamic formal verifier for MPI programs. In SC, pages 1-10. IEEE, 2010.
41. H. Xi. Imperative programming with dependent types. In LICS, pages 375-387. IEEE, 2000.
42. H. Xi and F. Pfenning. Dependent types in practical programming. In POPL, pages 214-227. ACM, 1999.
43. N. Yoshida, R. Hu, R. Neykova, and N. Ng. The Scribble protocol language. In TGC, volume 8358 of LNCS, pages 22-41. Springer, 2013.