Psychophysiology as a core strategy in RDoC

Psychophysiology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 410-414

  Miller, Gregory A ^a   Rockstroh, Brigitte S ^b   Hamilton, Holly K ^a   Yee, Cindy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

DSM; Endophenotype; Psychophysiology; RDoC

Indexed keywords

ENDOPHENOTYPE; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RESEARCH;

ENDOPHENOTYPES; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH (U.S.); PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RESEARCH;

EID: 84958608892     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12581     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Berenbaum, H. (2013). Classification and psychopathology research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 894-901. doi: 10.1037/a0033096
2. Berkman, E. G., & Falk, E. B. (2013). Beyond brain mapping: Using neural measures to predict real-world outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 45-50. doi: 10.1177/0963721412469394
3. Cuthbert, B. N. (2014a). Response to Lilienfeld. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 140-142. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.001
4. Cuthbert, B. N. (2014b). Translating intermediate phenotypes to psychopathology: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria. Psychophysiology, 51, 1205-1206. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12342
5. Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2010a). The data of diagnosis: New approaches to psychiatric classification. Psychiatry, 73, 311-314. doi: 10.1521/psyc.2010.73.4.311
6. Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2010b). Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria project. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 1061-1062. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq108
7. Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11, 126. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-126
8. Cuthbert, B. N., & Kozak, M. J. (2013). Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 928-937. doi: 10.1037/a0034028
9. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York, NY: Free Press.
10. Engel, G. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129-136. doi: 10.1126/science.847460
11. Frances, A. J., & Widiger, T. (2012). Psychiatric diagnosis: Lessons from the DSM-IV past and cautions for the DSM-5 future. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 109-130. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143102
12. Gould, T. D., & Gottesman, I. I. (2006) Psychiatric endophenotypes and the development of valid animal models. Genes, Brain, Behavior, 5, 113-119.
13. Heckers, S. (in press). The value of psychiatric diagnoses. JAMA Psychiatry.
14. Hyman, S. E. (1998). NIMH during the tenure of director Steven E. Hyman, MD: The now and future of NIMH [Supplement]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 36-40.
15. Hyman, S. E. (2010). The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155-179. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091532
16. Iacono, W. G. (2014). Genome-wide scans of genetic variants of psychophysiological endophenotypes: Introduction to this special issue of Psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 51, 1201-1202. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12340
17. Insel, T. R., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2009). Endophenotypes: Bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 988-989. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.008
18. Insel, T. R., Cuthbert, B. N., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., ... Wang, P. S. (2010). Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 167, 748-751. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379
19. Kozak, M. J., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2016). The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics. Psychophysiology, 53, 286-297.
20. Kozak, M. J., & Miller, G. A. (1982). Hypothetical constructs versus intervening variables: A re-appraisal of the three-systems model of anxiety assessment. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 347-358.
21. Kraemer, H. C. (in press). Two methodological approaches to mental health diagnosis. JAMA Psychiatry.
22. Kraemer, H. C., Noda, A., & O'Hara, R. (2004). Categorical vs. dimensional approaches to diagnosis: Methodological challenges. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 38, 17-25. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00097-9
23. Lang, P. J. (1968). Fear and behavior: Problems in treating a construct. In J. M. Shlien (Ed.), Research in psychotherapy (Vol. 3, pp. 90-102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10546-004
24. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Cognitive neuroscience and depression: Legitimate versus illegitimate reductionism and five challenges. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 263-272.
25. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014). The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): An analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.019
26. Lilienfeld, S. O., Ritschel, L. A., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., & Latzman, R. D. (2014). Why ineffective psychotherapies appear to work: A taxonomy of causes of spurious therapeutic effectiveness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 355-387. doi: 10.1177/1745691614535216
27. Miller, G. A. (1996). How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in psychopathology. Psychophysiology, 21, 615-628.
28. Miller, G. A. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716-743. doi: 10.1177/1745691610388774
29. Miller, G. A., Clayson, P. E., & Yee, C. M. (2014). Hunting genes, hunting endophenotypes. Psychophysiology, 51, 1329-1330. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12354
30. Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000). Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 212-215. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00097
31. Miller, G. A., & Kozak, M. J. (1993). A philosophy for the study of emotion: Three-systems theory. In N. Birbaumer & A. Öhman (Eds.), The structure of emotion: Physiological, cognitive and clinical aspects (pp. 31-47). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
32. Miller, G. A., & Rockstroh, B. (2013). Endophenotypes in psychopathology research: Where do we stand? Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 177-213. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsyh-050212-185540
33. Miller, G. A., & Yee, C. M. (2015). Moving psychopathology forward. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 263-267. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2015.1037818
34. Sanislow, C. A., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., Kozak, M. J., Garvey, M. A., Heinssen, R. K., ... Cuthbert, B. N. (2010). Developing constructs for psychopathology research: Research domain criteria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 631-639. doi: 10.1037/a0020909
35. Vaidyanathan, U., Vrieze, S. I., & Iacono, W. G. (2015). The power of theory, research design, and transdisciplinary integration in moving psychopathology forward. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 209-230. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2015.1015367
36. Weinberger, Glick, & Klein . (in press). Whither RDoC: The good, the bad, and the ugly. JAMA Psychiatry.
37. Yancey, J. R., Venables, N. C., & Patrick, C. (2016). Psychoneurometric operationalization of threat sensitivity: Relations with clinical symptom and physiological response criteria. Psychophysiology, 53, 393-405.
38. Yee, C. M., Javitt, D. C., & Miller, G. A. (2016). Beyond DSM: Replacing categorical with dimensional analyses in psychiatry research-The RDoC initiative. JAMA Psychiatry.