Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stage i non-small cell lung cancer in the national cancer data base

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 1037-1042

  Yang, Chi Fu Jeffrey ^a   Sun, Zhifei ^a   Speicher, Paul J ^a   Saud, Shakir M ^c   Gulack, Brian C ^a   Hartwig, Matthew G ^a   Harpole, David H ^a   Onaitis, Mark W ^a   Tong, Betty C ^a   D'Amico, Thomas A ^a   Berry, Mark F ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG LOBECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; CLINICAL TRIAL; FOLLOW UP; INCIDENCE; LUNG NEOPLASMS; LUNG RESECTION; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROPENSITY SCORE; PUERTO RICO; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; SURVIVAL RATE; TRENDS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY;

AGED; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; PNEUMONECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; PUERTO RICO; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURVIVAL RATE; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84958595491     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. T.D. Yan, D. Black, P.G. Bannon, and B.C. McCaughan Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 27 2009 2553 2562
2. D.J. Mathisen Is video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy inferior to open lobectomy oncologically? Ann Thorac Surg 96 2013 755 756
3. J.L. Wilson, B.E. Louie, R.J. Cerfolio, and et al. The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer Ann Thorac Surg 97 2014 1901 1907
4. B.J. Park Cost concerns for robotic thoracic surgery Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1 2012 56 58
5. B.S. Nasir, A.S. Bryant, D.J. Minnich, B. Wei, and R.J. Cerfolio Performing robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: cost, profitability, and outcomes Ann Thorac Surg 98 2014 203 209
6. S. Paul, J. Jalbert, A.J. Isaacs, N.K. Altorki, O.W. Isom, and A. Sedrakyan Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus thoracoscopic lobectomy Chest 146 2014 1505 1512
7. S. Edge, D.R. Byrd, C.C. Compton, A.G. Fritz, F.L. Greene, and A. Trotti American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual 2010 Springer New York
8. B.M. Burt, A.S. Kosinski, J.B. Shrager, M.W. Onaitis, and T. Weigel Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide less than 40% of normal J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 2014 19 29.e11
9. D.M. Shahian, J.P. Jacobs, F.H. Edwards, and et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons national database Heart 99 2013 1494 1501
10. P.B. Licht, O.D. Jorgensen, L. Ladegaard, and E. Jakobsen A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer Ann Thorac Surg 96 2013 943 950
11. D.J. Boffa, A.S. Kosinski, S. Paul, J.D. Mitchell, and M. Onaitis Lymph node evaluation by open or video-assisted approaches in 11,500 anatomic lung cancer resections Ann Thorac Surg 94 2012 347 353
12. M. Kent, T. Wang, R. Whyte, T. Curran, R. Flores, and S. Gangadharan Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database Ann Thorac Surg 97 2014 236 244
13. C. Steiner, A. Elixhauser, and J. Schnaier The healthcare cost and utilization project: an overview Effect Clin Pract 5 2002 143 151
14. R.D. Adams, W.D. Bolton, J.E. Stephenson, G. Henry, E.T. Robbins, and E. Sommers Initial multicenter community robotic lobectomy experience: comparisons to a national database Ann Thorac Surg 97 2014 1893 1900
15. S.J. Swanson, D.L. Miller, R.J. McKenna, and et al. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (premier) J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147 2014 929 937
16. B.E. Lee, R.J. Korst, E. Kletsman, and J.R. Rutledge Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147 2014 724 729
17. F. Augustin, J. Bodner, H. Maier, and et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive versus thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting Langenbeck's Arch Surgery/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 398 2013 895 901
18. B.E. Louie, A.S. Farivar, R.W. Aye, and E. Vallieres Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases Ann Thorac Surg 93 2012 1598 1605