An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 581-586

  Shembesh, Marwa ^a   Ali, Ala ^a   Finkelman, Matthew ^a   Weber, Hans Peter ^a   Zandparsa, Roya ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; conventional impressions; Digital impressions; marginal adaptation accuracy; zirconia

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84958576405     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12446     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D: Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:786-790
2. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, et al: Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:587-592
3. Kenyon BJ, Hagge MS, Leknius C, et al: Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials. J Prosthodont 2005;14:25-31
4. Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN: Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. J Dent 2004;32:603-609
5. Bloem TJ, Czerniaawski B, Luke J, et al: Determination of the accuracy of three die systems. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:758-762
6. Luthardt RG, Kühmsted P, Walter MH: A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials. Dent Mater 2003;19:19-24
7. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG: The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. J Dent Clin North Am 2011;3:559-709
8. Fasbinder D: Using digital technology to enhance restorative dentistry. Compendium J 2012;9:666-677
9. Hunter AJ, Hunter AR: Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discussion. Part II: Discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:636-642
10. Sailer Ι, Feher A, Filser F, et al: Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial denture. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-388
11. Iwai T, Komine F, Kobayashi K, et al: Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66:214-218
12. Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA: Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:250-257
13. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, et al: Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:587-592
14. Bindl A, Mormann WH: Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-447
15. Suárez MJ, González de Villaumbrosia P, Pradíes G, et al: Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:229-232
16. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, et al: Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-388
17. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA: The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-111
18. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, et al: Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174-179
19. Kim SY, Kim MJ, Han JS, et al: Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:161-163
20. Loos R, Quaas S, Luthardt RG: Accuracy of conventional impression taking compared to intraoral digitising—a randomized controlled trial. Joint Meeting of the Continental European (CED) and Scandinavian (NOF) Divisions of the IADR, 2005
21. Ender A, Wiedhahn K, Mormann WH: Chairside multi-unit restoration of a quadrant using the new Cerec 3D software. Int J Comput Dent 2003;6:89-94
22. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al: Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-559
23. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S: Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;4:283-294
24. Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, et al: A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent 2009;6:378-384
25. Banday O, Nathanson D: Determining the accuracy of a CAD-CAM milled polyurethane die system (Cadent iTero) derived from optical-digital impressions. Master Thesis, Boston University 2011;55-69
26. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA: Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;4:363-376
27. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, et al: In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-590
28. Kern M, Schaller HG, Strub JR: Marginal fit of restorations before and after cementation in vivo. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:585-591