Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 25-31

  Kenyon, Brian J ^a   Hagge, Mark S ^a   Leknius, Casimir ^a   Daniels, Walter C ^b   Weed, Scott T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^b DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Copper plating; Dental gypsum; Dental materials; Epoxy resin; Type IV die stone

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM SULFATE; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; EPOXY RESIN; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; EVALUATION; MATERIALS TESTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH CROWN;

CALCIUM SULFATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COPPER; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL MODELS; EPOXY RESINS; MATERIALS TESTING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 21244438646     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00007.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Craig RG, Powers JM: Restorative Dental Materials (ed 11). St. Louis, Mosby, 2002, pp 373-379.
2. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW: Phillips' Science of Dental Materials (ed 11). St. Louis, Saunders, 2003, pp 266-318.
3. Toreskog S, Phillips RW, Schnell RJ: Properties of die materials: A comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 1966;22:119-131.
4. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J (eds): Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics (ed 3). St. Louis, Mosby, 2001, pp 431-435.
5. Chaffee NR, Bailey JH, Sherrard DJ: Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:131-135.
6. Fan PL, Powers JM, Reid BC: Surface mechanical properties of stone, resin, and metal dies. J Am Dent Assoc 1981;103:408-411.
7. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Rhoads JE: Dental Laboratory Procedures, (ed 2). St. Louis, Mosby, 1986, p 67.
8. Ragain JC, Grosko ML, Raj M, et al: Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:214-220.
9. Duke P, Moore BK, Haug SP, et al: Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing, and epoxy die materials. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:466-473.
10. Derrien G, Sturtz G: Comparison of transverse strength and dimensional variations between die stone, die epoxy resin, and die polyurethane resin. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:569-574.
11. Derrien G, Le Menn G: Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:1-7.
12. Bailey JH, Donovan TE, Preston JD: The dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone, silverplated, and epoxy resin die materials. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:307-310.
13. Cassimaty EM, Walton TR: Effect of three variables on the accuracy and variability of electroplated copper dies. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:547-554.
14. Astiz PH, Lorencki SF: Comparative accuracy of commonly used dental die materials. J Can Dent Assoc 1969;35:320-323.
15. Paquette JM, Taniguchi T, White SN: Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin die material using two setting methods. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:301-305.
16. Yaman P, Brandau HE: Comparison of three epoxy die materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:328-331.
17. Schaffer H, Dumfahrt H, Gausch K: Distance alterations of dies in sagittal direction in dependence of the die material. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:684-688.
18. Heshmati RH, Nagy WW, Wirth CG, et al: Delayed linear expansion of improved dental stone. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:26-31.
19. O'Brien WJ: Dental materials and their selection (ed 3). Chicago, Quintessence, 2002, p 44.
20. Lindquist TJ, Stanford CM, Mostafavi H, et al: Abrasion resistance of a resin-impregnated type IV gypsum in comparison to conventional products. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:319-322.
21. Toreskog S, Phillips RW, Schnell RJ: Properties of die materials: A comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:103-110.
22. Aramouni P, Millstein P: A comparison of the accuracy of two removable die systems with intact working casts. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:533-539.