Recursive maximum likelihood method for the identification of Hammerstein ARMAX system

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 40, Issue 13-14, 2016, Pages 6523-6535

  Ma, Liang ^a   Liu, Xinggao ^a  

^a STATE KEY LABORATORY OF INDUSTRIAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Hammerstein ARMAX system; Recursive identification; RML

Indexed keywords

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS;

HAMMERSTEIN; HAMMERSTEIN MODEL; HAMMERSTEIN SYSTEM; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS; ON-LINE IDENTIFICATION; OVERPARAMETERIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION PROBLEMS; RECURSIVE IDENTIFICATION;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD;

EID: 84958568486     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.01.062     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ding B.C., Ping X.B. Dynamic output feedback model predictive control for nonlinear systems represented by Hammerstein-Wiener model. J. Process Control 2012, 22:1773-1784.
2. Kopeikin A.N., Ponda S.S., Johnson L.B., How J.P. Dynamic mission planning for communication control in multiple unmanned aircraft teams. Unmanned Syst. 2013, 1:41-58.
3. Shi Y., Fang H. Kalman filter based identification for systems with randomly missing measurements in a network environment. Int. J. Control 2010, 83:538-551.
4. Kara T., Eker I. Nonlinear modeling and identification of a DC motor for bidirectional operation with real time experiments. Energy Convers. Manag. 2004, 45:1087-1106.
5. Jelali M. Estimation of valve stiction in control loops using separable least-squares and global search algorithms. J. Process Control 2008, 18:632-642.
6. Kara T., Eker I. Experimental nonlinear identification of a two mass system. Proceedings of 2003 IEEE Conference on Control Applications 2003, 66-71.
7. Togun N., Baysec S., Kara T. Nonlinear modeling and identification of a spark ignition engine torque. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2012, 26:294-304.
8. Fink A., Nelles O. Nonlinear internal model control based on local linear neural networks. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2001, vol. 1:117-122.
9. Shi J., Xu X., Dai Y. Identification of Hammerstein LSSVM-ARMA systems and its application in continuous stirred tank rector. Energy Procedia 2011, 13:5359-5365.
10. Li C.H., Zhu X.J., Cao G.Y., Sui S., Hu M.R. Identification of the Hammerstein model of a PEMFC stack based on least squares support vector machines. J. Power Sour. 2008, 175:303-316.
11. Kang K., Prasad J.V.R. Development and flight test evaluations of an autonomous obstacle avoidance system for a rotary-wing UAV. Unmanned Syst. 2013, 1:13-19.
12. Greblicki W. Recursive identification of continuous-time Hammerstein systems. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 2002, 33:969-977.
13. Chang F., Luns R. A noniterative method for identification using Hammerstein model. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1971, 16:464-468.
14. Xiang W., Chen Z.H. New identification method of nonlinear systems based on Hammerstein models. Control Theory Appl. 2007, 24:143-147.
15. Jeng J.C., Huang H.P. Nonparametric identification for control of MIMO Hammerstein systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:6640-6647.
16. Greblicki W., Pawlak M. Nonparametric System Identification 2008, Cambridge University Press.
17. Hasiewicz Z., Mzyk G. Hammerstein system identification by non-parametric instrumental variables. Int. J. Control 2009, 82:440-455.
18. Liu Y., Bai E.W. Iterative identification of Hammerstein systems. Automatica 2007, 43:346-354.
19. Li J.H. Parameter estimation for Hammerstein CARARMA systems based on the Newton iteration. Appl. Math. Lett. 2013, 26:91-96.
20. Liu X.G., Lu J. Least squares based iterative identification for a class of multirate systems. Automatica 2010, 46:549-554.
21. Shen Q., Ding F. Iterative estimation methods for Hammerstein controlled autoregressive moving average systems based on the key-term separation principle. Nonlinear Dyn. 2014, 75:709-716.
22. Ma L., Liu X.G. A nonlinear recursive instrumental variables identification method of Hammerstein ARMAX system. Nonlinear Dyn. 2015, 79:1601-1613.
23. Zhao W.X., Chen H.F. Adaptive tracking and recursive identification for Hammerstein systems. Automatica 2009, 45:2773-2783.
24. Chen X.M., Chen H.M. Recursive identification for MIMO Hammerstein systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2011, 56:895-902.
25. Vörös J. Recursive identification of nonlinear cascade systems with time-varying general input backlash. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 2013, 135:14504.
26. Feng D., Liu X.M., Chen H.B., Yao G.Y. Hierarchical gradient based and hierarchical least squares based iterative parameter identification for CARARMA systems. Signal Process. 2014, 97:31-39.
27. Ding J., Shi Y., Wang H., Ding F. A modified stochastic gradient based parameter estimation algorithm for dual-rate sampled-data systems. Digit. Signal Process. 2010, 20:1238-1247.
28. Ding J., Shi Y., Wang H., Ding F. A modified stochastic gradient based parameter estimation algorithm for dual-rate sampled-data systems. Digit. Signal Process. 2010, 20:1238-1247.
29. Greblicki W., Pawlak M. Identification of discrete Hammerstein systems using kernel regression estimates. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1986, 31:74-77.
30. Li G., Wen C., Zheng W., Chen Y. Identification of a class of nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous inputs models based on kernel machines. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2011, 59:2146-2158.
31. Huang B., Ding S.X., Qin S.J. Closed-loop subspace identification: An orthogonal projection approach. J. Process Control 2005, 15:53-66.
32. Liao Z.Z., Zhu Z.T., Liang S., Peng C., Wang Y. Subspace identification for fractional order Hammerstein systems based on instrumental variables. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 2012, 10:947-953.
33. Goethals I., Pelckmans K., Suykens J., Moor B.De Identification of MIMO Hammerstein models using least squares support vector machines. Automatica 2005, 41:1263-1272.
34. Chen H.F. Strong consistency of recursive identification for Hammerstein systems with discontinuous piecewise-linear memoryless block. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2005, 50:1612-1617.
35. Westwick D., Kearney R. Separable least squares identification of nonlinear Hammerstein models: Application to stretch reflex dynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 29:707-718.
36. Previdi F., Lovera M. Identification of non-linear parametrically varying models using separable least squares. Int. J. Control 2004, 77:1382-1392.
37. Golub G., Pereyra V. Separable nonlinear least squares: The variable projection method and its applications. Inverse Probl. 2003, 19:R1-R26.
38. Bai E.W. A blind approach to the Hammerstein-Wiener model identification. Automatica 2002, 38:967-979.
39. Vanbeylen L., Pintelon R., Schoukens J. Blind maximum likelihood identification of Hammerstein systems. Automatica 2008, 44:3139-3146.
40. Wang J., Sano A., Shook D., Chen T., Huang B. A blind approach to closed-loop identification of Hammerstein systems. Int. J. Control 2007, 80:302-313.
41. Bai E.W. Frequency domain identification of Hammerstein models. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2003, 48:530-542.
42. Deng W.H., Li K., Deng J., Jiang E.Y., Zhu Q. Computational intelligence, networked systems and their applications. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. Ger. 2014, 462:293-299.
43. Janczak A. Neural network approach for identification of Hammerstein systems. Int. J. Control 2003, 76:1749-1766.
44. Sun J.L., Liu X.G. A novel APSO-aided maximum likelihood identification method for Hammerstein systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 2013, 73:449-462.
45. Nanda S.J., Panda G., Majhi B. Improved identification of Hammerstein plants using new CPSO and IPSO algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37:6818-6831.
46. Lin W., Liu P. Hammerstein model identification based on bacterial foraging. Electron. Lett. 2006, 42:1332-1334.
47. Chen C.H., Fassois S.D. Maximum likelihood identification of stochastic Wiener-Hammerstein-type non-linear systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 1992, 6:135-153.
48. Fisher R.A. On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics, Reprinted in Contributions to Mathematical Statistic 1950, J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
49. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User 1987, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
50. Amemiya T. The nonlinear limited-information maximum-likelihood estimator and the modified nonlinear two-stage least-squares estimator. J. Econom. 1975, 3:375-386.
51. Li J.H., Ding F., Yang G.W. Maximum likelihood least squares identification method for input nonlinear finite impulse response moving average systems. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 55:442-450.
52. Gallman P.G. A comparison of two Hammerstein model identification algorithms. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1976, 21:124-126.
53. Astrom K.J. Maximum likelihood and prediction error methods. Automatica 1980, 16:551-574.
54. Wang W., Ding F., Dai J. Maximum likelihood least squares identification for systems with autoregressive moving average noise. Appl. Math. Model. 2012, 36:1842-1853.
55. Ding F., Chen T.W. Identification of Hammerstein nonlinear ARMAX systems. Automatica 2005, 41:1479-1489.