A Qualified Kolmogorovian Account of Probabilistic Contextuality

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8369 LNCS, Issue , 2014, Pages 201-212

  Dzhafarov, Ehtibar N ^a   Kujala, Janne V ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bell type inequalities; Cirelson inequalities; Context; Contextuality by default; Coupling; Determinism; Direct influences; EPR paradigm; Marginal selectivity; Sample spaces; Stochastically unrelated variables

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS; COUPLINGS;

BELL-TYPE INEQUALITIES; CIRELSON INEQUALITIES; CONTEXT; CONTEXTUALITY-BY- DEFAULT; DETERMINISM; DIRECT INFLUENCES; SAMPLE SPACE; STOCHASTICALLY UNRELATED VARIABLES;

BELLS;

EID: 84958523956     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54943-4_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Aerts, D., Gabora, L., Sozzo, S.: Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5(4), 737-772 (2013). doi:10.111/tops. 12042
2. Basoalto, R.M., Percival, I.C.: Belltest and chsh experiments with more than two settings. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 7411-7423 (2003)
3. Bell, J.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195-200 (1964)
4. Cirel'son, B.S.: Quantum generalizations of bell's inequality. Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93-100 (1980)
5. Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A.: Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Phys. Rev. D 10, 526-535 (1974)
6. Dzhafarov, E.N.: Selective influence through conditional independence. Psychometrika 68, 7-26 (2003)
7. Dzhafarov, E.N., Kujala, J.V.: The joint distribution criterion and the distance tests for selective probabilistic causality. Front. Quant. Psychol. Meas. 1, 151 (2010). doi:10. 3389/fpsyg.2010.0015
8. Dzhafarov, E.N., Kujala, J.V.: Selectivity in probabilistic causality: where psychology runs into quantum physics. J. Math. Psychol. 56, 54-63 (2012a)
9. Dzhafarov, E.N., Kujala, J.V.: Quantum entanglement and the issue of selective influences in psychology: an overview. In: Busemeyer, J.R., Dubois, F., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Melucci, M. (eds.) QI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7620, pp. 184-195. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
10. Dzhafarov, E.N., Kujala, J.V.: All-possible-couplings approach to measuring probabilistic context. PLoS ONE 8(5), e61712 (2013a). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061712
11. Dzhafarov, E.N., Kujala, J.V.: Order-distance and other metric-like functions on jointly distributed random variables. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 141, 3291-3301 (2013b)
12. Dzhafarov, E.N., Kujala, J.V.: On selective influences, marginal selectivity, and Bell/CHSH inequalities. Top. Cogn. Sci. 6(1), 121-128 (2014). doi:10.1111/tops. 12060
13. Fine, A.: Hidden variables, joint probability, and the bell inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291-295 (1982)
14. Khrennikov, A.Y.: Bell-boole inequality: nonlocality or probabilistic incompatibility of random variables? Entropy 10, 19-32 (2008a)
15. Khrennikov, A.Y.: Epr-bohm experiment and bell's inequality: quantum physics meets probability theory. Theor. Math. Phys. 157, 1448-1460 (2008b)
16. Khrennikov, A.Y.: Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
17. Kujala, J.V., Dzhafarov, E.N.: Testing for selectivity in the dependence of random variables on external factors. J. Math. Psychol. 52, 128-144 (2008)
18. Landau, L.J.: On the violation of bell's inequality in quantum theory. Phys. Lett. A 120, 54-56 (1987)
19. Laudisa, F.: Contextualism and nonlocality in the algebra of epr observables. Philos. Sci. 64, 478-496 (1997)
20. Schweickert, R., Fisher, D.L., Sung, K.: Discovering Cognitive Architecture by Selectively Influencing Mental Processes. World Scientific, New Jersey (2012)
21. Thorisson, H.: Coupling, Stationarity, and Regeneration. Springer, New York (2000)
22. Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J.R., Atmanspacher, H., Pothos, E.: The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5(4), 672-688 (2013). doi:10.1111/tops.12043