Bell-boole inequality: Nonlocality or probabilistic incompatibility of random variables?

Entropy

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 19-32

  Khrennikov, Andrei ^a  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

"Death of reality"; Bell's inequality; Boole's necessary condition; Contextual description of the EPR bohm experiment; Nonlocality; Parameters of measurement devices; Probabilistic incompatibility of random variables; Vorobjev theorem

Indexed keywords

EID: 45849097167     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10994300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/entropy-e10020019     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bell, J.S. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics; Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge, UK, 1987.
2. d'Espagnat, B. Veiled Reality. An anlysis of present-day quantum mechanical concepts; Addison-Wesley, New York, USA, 1995.
3. Shimony, A. Search for a naturalistic world view; Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993.
4. Clauser, J.F.; Home, M.A.; Shimony, A.; Holt, R.A. Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. Phys. Rev. Letters 1969, 23, 880-884.
5. Clauser, J.F.; Shimony, A. Bells theorem: experimental facts and implications. Rep. Progr. Phys. 1978, 41, 1881-1901.
6. Wigner, E.P. On Hidden Variables and Quantum Mechanical Properties. Am. J. Phys. 1970, 38, 1005-1015.
7. Aspect, A.; Dalibard, J.; Roger, G. Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using variable analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49, 1804-1807.
8. Home, D.; Selleri, F. Bell's theorem and the EPR paradox. Nuovo Cim. Rivista 1991, 14, 2-176.
9. Stapp, H.P S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Phys. Rev. D 1971, 3, 1303-1320.
10. Eberhard, P.H. Bell's Theorem Without Hidden Variables. Il Nuovo Cimento B 1977, 38, 75-80.
11. Eberhard, P.H. Bells theorem and the different concepts of locality. Il Nuovo Cimento B 1978, 46, 392-419.
12. Eberhard, P.H. Constraints of Determinism and of Bell's Inequalities Are Not Equivalent. Phys. Rev. Letters 1982, 49, 1474-1477.
13. Peres, A. Unperformed experiments have no results. Am. J. Phys. 1978, 46, 745-750.
14. Weihs, G.; Jennewein, T.; Simon, C.; Weinfurter, H.; Zeilinger, A. Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81, 5039-5042.
15. Weihs, G. A test of Bell's inequality with spacelike separation. In Proc. Conf. Foundations of Probability and Physics - 4; American Institute of Physics: Melville, NY, 2007; Ser. Conference Proceedings, Volume 889, pp. 250-262.
16. Khrennikov, A., Ed. Proc. Conf. Foundations of Probability and Physics; WSP: Singapore, 2001; Ser. Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis, Volume 13.
17. Khrennikov, A., Ed. Proc. Conf. Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations; Växjö Univ. Press: Växjö, Sweden, 2002; Ser. Math. Modeling, Volume 2.
18. Khrennikov, A., Ed. Proc. Conf. Foundations of Probability and Physics - 2; Växjö Univ. Press: Växjö, Sweden, 2003; Ser. Math. Modeling, Volume 5.
19. Khrennikov, A., Ed., Proc. Conf. Foundations of Probability and Physics - 3; American Institute of Physics: Melville, USA, 2005; Ser. Conference Proceedings, Volume 750.
20. Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A., Nieuwenhuizen, T., Eds. Proc. Conf. Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations - 3; American Institute of Physics: Melville, USA, 2006; Ser. Conference Proceedings, Volume 810.
21. Adenier, G., Fuchs, C., Khrennikov, A., Eds. Proc. Conf. Foundations of Probability and Physics 3; American Institute of Physics: Melville, USA, 2007; Ser. Conference Proceedings, Volume 889.
22. Kolmogoroff, A.N. Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung; Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1933;
23. reprinted: Foundations of the Probability Theory; Chelsea Publ. Comp.: New York, USA, 1956.
24. Gnedenko, B.V. The theory of probability; Chelsea Publ. Comp.: New-York, USA, 1962.
25. Accardi, L. The probabilistic roots of the quantum mechanical paradoxes. In Proc. Conf. The wave-particle dualism. A tribute to Louis de Broglie on his 90th Birthday; Reidel Publ. Company: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1970; pp. 47-55.
26. Accardi, L. Urne e Camaleoni: Dialogo sulla realta, le leggi del caso e la teoria quantistica Il Saggiatore: Rome, Italy, 1997.
27. Accardi, L. Could one now convince Einstein? In Proc. Conf Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations - 3 American Institute of Physics: Melville, USA, 2006; Ser. Conf. Proc., Volume 810, pp. 3-18.
28. Fine, A. Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 48, 291-295.
29. Pitowsky, I. Resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell Paradoxes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 48, 1299-1302.
30. Pitowsky, I. Deterministic Model of Spin and Statistics. Phys. Rev. D 1983, 27, 2316-2326.
31. Rastall, P. The Bell inequalities. Found. Phys. 1983, 13, 555-575.
32. Hess, K.; Philipp, W. A possible loophole in the theorem of Bell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98, 14224.
33. Hess, K.; Philipp, W. Exclusion of time in the theorem of Bell. Europhys. Lett. 2002, 57, 775.
34. Hess, K.; Philipp, W. Bell's theorem: critique of proofs with and without inequalities. In Proc. Conf. Foundations of Probability and Physics - 3; American Institute of Physics: Melville, NY, 2005; Ser. Conf. Proc., Volume 750, 150-155.
35. Khrennikov, A. Statistical measure of ensemble nonreproducibility and correction to Bell's inequality. Il Nuovo Cimento B 1999, 115, 179-184.
36. Khrennikov, A. Non-Kolmogorov probability models and modified Bell's inequality. J. Math. Phys. 2000, 41, 1768-1777.
37. Khrennikov, A. A perturbation of CHSH inequality induced by fluctuations of ensemble distributions. J. Math. Phys. 2000, 41, 5934-5944.
38. Pitowsky, I. From George Boole to John Bell: The Origins of Bells Inequalities. In Proc. Conf. Bells Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe; Kluwer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1989; pp. 37-49.
39. Pitowsky, I. Range Theorems for Quantum Probability and Entanglement. In Proc. Conf. Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations; Vaxjo University Press: Vaxjo, Sweden, 2002; pp. 299-308.
40. Vorob'ev, N.N. Theory of Probability and its Applications 1962, 7, 147-162.
41. Khrennikov, A. Interpretations of Probability, 2nd Ed.; VSP Int. Sc. Publishers: Utrecht, Netherlands/Tokyo, Japan, 2004.
42. Muckenheim, W. Can a negative quantity be deemed a probability? Phys. Rep. 1986, 133, 338-401.
43. Khrennikov, A. Axiomatics of the p-adic theory of probability. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Matem. 1992, 326, 1075-1079.
44. Khrennikov, A. p-adic quantum mechanics with p-adic valued functions. J. Math. Phys. 1991, 32, 932-937.
45. Khrennikov, A. p-adic probability interpretation of Bell's inequality paradoxes. Phys. Lett. A 1995, 200, 119-223.
46. Khrennikov, A. p-adic probability distribution of hidden variables. Physica A 1995, 215, 577-587.
47. Khrennikov, A. p-adic probability description of Dirac's hypothetical world. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1995, 34, 2423-2434.
48. Khrennikov, A. Statistical interpretation of p-adic quantum theories with p-adic valued wave functions. J. Math. Phys. 1995, 36, 6625-6632.
49. Khrennikov, A. p-Adic Valued Distributions in Mathematical Physics; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1994.
50. Khrennikov, A. Non-Archimedean Analysis: Quantum Paradoxes, Dynamical Systems and Biological Models; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1997.
51. De Baere, W. EPR paradox and Bell inequalities. Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics 1986, 68, 245-336.
52. De Muynck, W. M. Interpretations of quantum mechanics, and interpretations of violations of Bell's inequality. In Proc. Conf. Foundations of Probability and Physics; WSP: Singapore, 2001; Series PQ-QP: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis, Volume 13, pp. 95-104.
53. De Muynck, W.; De Baere, W.; H. Marten Interpretations of quantum mechanics, joint measurement of incompatible observables, and counterfactual definiteness. Found. Phys. 1994, 24, 1589-1663.
54. De Muynck, W.; Stekelenborg, J.T. On the Significance of the Bell Inequalities for the Locality Problem in Different Realistic Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics, Annalen der Physik 1988, 45, 222-234.
55. Khrennikov, A. A pre-quantum classical statistical model with infinite-dimensional phase space. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 2005, 38, 9051-9073.
56. Khrennikov, A. Generalizations of Quantum Mechanics Induced by Classical Statistical Field Theory. Found. Phys. Lett. 2006, 18, 637-650.
57. Khrennikov, A. Nonlinear Schrdinger equations from prequantum classical statistical field theory Phys. Lett. A 2006, 357, 171-176.
58. Einstein, A.; Podolsky, B.; Rosen, N. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Phys. Rev. 1935, 47, 777-780.
59. Khrennikov, A.; Volovich, I.V. Local realistic representation for correlations in the original EPR-model for position and momentum. Soft Computing 2005, 10, 521-529.
60. Pearle, P. Hidden-Variable Example Based upon Data Rejection. Phys. Rev. D 1970, 2, 1418-1428.
61. Gisin, N.; Gisin, B. Bell inequality for arbitrary many settings of the analyzers. Phys. Lett. A 1999, 260, 323-333.
62. Larsson, J. Quantum Paradoxes, Probability Theory, and Change of Ensemble; Linköping Univ. Press: Linköping, Sweden, 2000.
63. Adenier, G.; Khrennikov, A. Anomalies in EPR-Bell experiments. In Proc. Conf. Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations - 3; American Institute of Physics: Melville, USA, 2006; Ser. Conference Proceedings, Volume 810, pp. 283-293.
64. Adenier, G.; Khrennikov, A. Is the fair sampling assumption supported by EPR experiments? J. Phys. B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 2007, 40(1), 131-141.