Changes of Brain Connectivity in the Primary Motor Cortex after Subcortical Stroke

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2016, Pages

  Li, Yongxin ^a   Wang, Defeng ^b   Zhang, Heye ^c   Wang, Ya ^d   Wu, Ping ^b   Zhang, Hongwu ^b   Yang, Yang ^c   Huang, Wenhua ^a  

^a SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c SHENZHEN INSTITUTES OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d CHENGDU UNIVERSITY OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CITICOLINE; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONNECTOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTING STATE NETWORK; STROKE PATIENT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; MOTOR CORTEX; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NERVE TRACT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PLATELET AGGREGATION INHIBITORS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE;

EID: 84958279763     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002579     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Crofts JJ, Higham DJ, Bosnell R, et al. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage. 2011;54:161-169
2. Grefkes C, Fink GR. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain. 2011;134:1264-1276
3. Li Y, Wu P, Liang F, et al. The microstructural status of the corpus callosum is associated with the degree of motor function and neurological deficit in stroke patients. PloS One. 2015;10:e0122615
4. Wang X, Casadio M, Weber Ii KA, et al. White matter microstructure changes induced by motor skill learning utilizing a body machine interface. Neuroimage. 2014;88:32-40
5. Rehme AK, Fink GR, von Cramon DY, et al. The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 21:756-768
6. Sanes JN, Donoghue JP. Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:393-415
7. Park CH, Chang WH, Ohn SH, et al. Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:1357-1362
8. Xu H, Qin W, Chen H, et al. Contribution of the resting-state functional connectivity of the contralesional primary sensorimotor cortex to motor recovery after subcortical stroke. PLoS One. 2014;9:e84729
9. Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, et al. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:741-747
10. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:2681-2686
11. Carter AR, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function? Neuroimage. 2012;62:2271-2280
12. Bullmore E. The future of functional MRI in clinical medicine. Neuroimage. 2012;62:1267-1271
13. Calautti C, Naccarato M, Jones PS, et al. The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke: a 3T fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2007;34:322-331
14. Schaechter JD. Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2004;73:61-72
15. Enzinger C, Dawes H, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Brain activity changes associated with treadmill training after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:2460-2467
16. Lindenberg R, Zhu LL, Ruber T, et al. Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33:1040-1051
17. Silasi G, Murphy Timothy H. Stroke and the connectome: how connectivity guides therapeutic intervention. Neuron. 2014;83:1354-1368
18. Chen JL, Schlaug G. Resting state interhemispheric motor connectivity and white matter integrity correlate with motor impairment in chronic stroke. Front Neurol. 2013;4:178
19. Wang LE, Tittgemeyer M, Imperati D, et al. Degeneration of corpus callosum and recovery of motor function after stroke: a multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33:2941-2956
20. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:232-240
21. Duffy L, Gajree S, Langhorne P, et al. Reliability (inter-rater agreement) of the Barthel index for assessment of stroke survivors systematic review and meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2013;44:462-468
22. Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials development, properties, and application. Stroke. 2011;42:1146-1151
23. Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, et al. Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain. 2010;133:1224-1238
24. Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, et al. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain? Neuroimage. 2007;34:144-155
25. van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Wang K, et al. Recovery of sensorimotor function after experimental stroke correlates with restoration of resting-state interhemispheric functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2010;30:3964-3972
26. Carter AR, Patel KR, Astafiev SV, et al. Upstream dysfunction of somatomotor functional connectivity after corticospinal damage in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:7-19
27. Rehme AK, Grefkes C. Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans. J Physiol. 2013;591:17-31
28. Honey CJ, Sporns O, Cammoun L, et al. Predicting human restingstate functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:2035-2040
29. Hofer S, Frahm J. Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited-comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2006;32:989-994
30. Perez MA, Cohen LG. Interhemispheric inhibition between primary motor cortices: what have we learned? J Physiol. 2009;587:725-726
31. Wahl M, Lauterbach-Soon B, Hattingen E, et al. Human motor corpus callosum: topography, somatotopy, and link between microstructure and function. J Neurosci. 2007;27:12132-12138
32. Takenobu Y, Hayashi T, Moriwaki H, et al. Motor recovery and microstructural change in rubro-spinal tract in subcortical stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;4:201-208
33. Ovadia-Caro S, Villringer K, Fiebach J, et al. Longitudinal effects of lesions on functional networks after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:1279-1285
34. Ovadia-Caro S, Margulies DS, Villringer A. The value of restingstate functional magnetic resonance imaging in stroke. Stroke. 2014;45:2818-2824
35. Carter AR, Astafiev SV, Lang CE, et al. Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:365-375
36. Bhadelia RA, Price LL, Tedesco KL, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging, white matter lesions, the corpus callosum, and gait in the elderly. Stroke. 2009;40:3816-3820
37. Huang H, Zhang J, Jiang H, et al. DTI tractography based parcellation of white matter: application to the mid-sagittal morphology of corpus callosum. Neuroimage. 2005;26:195-205
38. Wahl A-S, Schwab ME. Finding an optimal rehabilitation paradigm after stroke: enhancing fiber growth and training of the brain at the right moment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:381
39. Nakayama H, Jgtgensen H, Stig k, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Age (SD). 1994;74:12
40. Grefkes C, Ward NS. Cortical reorganization after stroke: how much and how functional? Neuroscientist. 2014;20:56-70