Elemental mercury removal using a novel KI modified bentonite supported by starch sorbent

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 291, Issue , 2016, Pages 306-316

  Shao, Haizhong ^a   Liu, Xiaowei ^a   Zhou, Zijian ^a   Zhao, Bo ^a   Chen, Zhenguo ^a   Xu, Minghou ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Bentonite; KI; Mechanism study; Mercury removal; Starch; Starch iodine complex

Indexed keywords

BENTONITE; IODINE; IODINE COMPOUNDS; MERCURY (METAL); REUSABILITY; SORBENTS; SORPTION; SULFUR DIOXIDE; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY;

ADSORPTION STUDIES; INCREASING TEMPERATURES; IODINE COMPLEXES; MECHANISM STUDIES; MERCURY REMOVAL; MODIFIED BENTONITES; SIMULATED FLUE GAS; SURFACE REACTIVITY;

STARCH;

EID: 84958260954     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.090     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Cao Y., Chen B., Wu J., Cui H., Smith J., Chen C.K., Chu P., Pan W.P. Study of mercury oxidation by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst in a pilot-scale slipstream reactor at a utility boiler burning bituminous coal. Energy Fuels 2007, 21:145-156.
2. Granite E.J., Pennline H.W., Hargis R.A. Novel sorbents for mercury removal from flue gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39:1020-1029.
3. Xu M., Yan R., Zheng C., Qiao Y., Han J., Sheng C. Status of trace element emission in a coal combustion process: a review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2004, 85:215-237.
4. Zhou Z., Liu X., Zhao B., Shao H., Xu Y., Xu M. Elemental mercury oxidation over manganese-based perovskite-type catalyst at low temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 288:701-710.
5. Zhao B., Liu X., Zhou Z., Shao H., Xu M. Catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury by Mn-Mo/CNT at low temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284:1233-1241.
6. 2 catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 253:508-517.
7. Lee S.J., Seo Y.C., Jurng J., Lee T.G. Removal of gas-phase elemental mercury by iodine-and chlorine-impregnated activated carbons. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38:4887-4893.
8. Luo G., Yao H., Xu M., Cui X., Chen W., Gupta R., Xu Z. Carbon nanotube-silver composite for mercury capture and analysis. Energy Fuels 2009, 24:419-426.
9. 0 removal from coal derived fuel gas: effect of hydrogen chloride. Fuel 2008, 87:467-474.
10. Pavlish J.H., Sondreal E.A., Mann M.D., Olson E.S., Galbreath K.C., Laudal D.L., Benson S.A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Process. Technol. 2003, 82:89-165.
11. Thome J., Himmelhaus M., Zharnikov M., Grunze M. Increased lateral density in alkanethiolate films on gold by mercury adsorption. Langmuir 1998, 14:7435-7449.
12. Mendioroz S., Guijarro M.I., Bermejo P.J., Muñoz V. Mercury retrieval from flue gas by monolithic adsorbents based on sulfurized sepiolite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33:1697-1702.
13. 2 sorption capacity of rice husk ash (RHA)/CaO/NaOH sorbents using response surface methodology (RSM): untreated and pretreated RHA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:1499-1504.
14. Lee S.S., Lee J.Y., Keener T.C. Novel sorbents for mercury emissions control from coal-fired power plants. J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng, 2008, 39:137-142.
15. 2-coated quartz tube atomizer and hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 189:609-613.
16. 3. J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 28:110-117.
17. Min L., Li W., Chen J.Y., Jiang Y.L., Wang W.J. Adsorption performance and mechanism of bentonite modified by ammonium bromide for gas-phase elemental mercury removal. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2014, 42:1266-1272.
18. Cai J., Shen B., Li Z., Chen J., He C. Removal of elemental mercury by clays impregnated with KI and KBr. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 241:19-27.
19. Zhang L., Zhuo Y., Du W., Tao Y., Chen C., Xu X. Hg removal characteristics of noncarbon sorbents in a fixed-bed reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:5292-5298.
20. Zhang A., Xiang J., Sun L., Hu S., Li P., Shi J., Fu P., Su S. Preparation, characterization, and application of modified chitosan sorbents for elemental mercury removal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:4980-4989.
21. Zhang A., Sun L., Xiang J., Hu S., Fu P., Su S., Zhou Y. Removal of elemental mercury from coal combustion flue gas by bentonite-chitosan and their modifier. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2009, 37:489-495.
22. A. Zhang, Experimental and mechanism study of elemental mercury removal from coal combustion flue gases by modified chitosan sorbents (Ph.D. Dissertation), Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, CHN, 2010.
23. Tan Z., Xiang J., Su S., Zeng H., Zhou C., Sun L., Hu S., Qiu J. Enhanced capture of elemental mercury by bamboo-based sorbents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 239:160-166.
24. Li Y., Daukoru M., Suriyawong A., Biswas P. Mercury emissions control in coal combustion systems using potassium iodide: bench-scale and pilot-scale studies. Energy Fuels 2009, 23:236-243.
25. Sinha R., Walker P. Removal of mercury by sulfurized carbons. Carbon 1972, 10:754-756.
26. 2 concentration on mercury removal by activated carbon sorbents in coal-derived flue gas. Energy Fuels 2009, 23:4734-4739.
27. Lopez-Antón M.A., Tascón J., Martínez-Tarazona M.R. Retention of mercury in activated carbons in coal combustion and gasification flue gases. Fuel Process. Technol. 2002, 77:353-358.
28. 2 nanocomposite. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89:567-573.
29. 2 for elemental mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas by activated carbon. Energy Fuels 2008, 22:2284-2289.
30. Dandekar A., Baker R.T.K., Vannice M.A. Characterization of activated carbon, graphitized carbon fibers and synthetic diamond powder using TPD and DRIFTS. Carbon 1998, 36:1821-1831.
31. Hanes C.S. The action of amylases in relation to the structure of starch and its metabolism in the plant. Parts I-III. New Phytol. 1937, 36:101-141.
32. Rappenecker G., Zugenmaier P. Detailed refinement of the crystal structure of V-amylose. Carbohydr. Res. 1981, 89:11-19.
33. Shen B., Chen J., Yue S. Removal of elemental mercury by titanium pillared clay impregnated with potassium iodine. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 203:216-223.
34. Eswaran S., Stenger H.G. Understanding mercury conversion in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts. Energy Fuels 2005, 19:2328-2334.
35. 3 catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 225:68-75.
36. Hsi H.C., Tsai C.Y., Kuo T.H., Chiang C.S. Development of low-concentration mercury adsorbents from biohydrogen-generation agricultural residues using sulfur impregnation. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:7470-7477.
37. Li Y.H., Lee C.W., Gullett B.K. Importance of activated carbon's oxygen surface functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption. Fuel 2003, 82:451-457.