Effect of molybdenum on mercury oxidized by V2O5-MoO3/TiO2 catalysts

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 253, Issue , 2014, Pages 508-517

  Zhao, Bo ^a   Liu, Xiaowei ^a   Zhou, Zijian ^a   Shao, Haizhong ^a   Wang, Chao ^a   Si, Junping ^a   Xu, Minghou ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Mars Maessen mechanism; Mercury; SCR

Indexed keywords

CATALYSTS; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; MERCURY (METAL); MOLYBDENUM METALLOGRAPHY; MOLYBDENUM OXIDE; NANOBELTS; SOL-GEL PROCESS; SOL-GELS; THYRISTORS; TITANIUM; VANADIUM METALLOGRAPHY; VANADIUM PENTOXIDE; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

CATALYST SURFACES; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; MERCURY OXIDATIONS; MOLYBDENUM CATALYST; MOLYBDENUM TRIOXIDE; OXIDIZED MERCURY; PROMOTIONAL EFFECT; VANADIUM CATALYST;

OXIDATION;

EID: 84902449420     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.071     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Brown T.D., Smith D.N., Hargis R.A., O'Dowd W.J. Mercury measurement and its control: what we know, have learned, and need to further investigate. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49:1-97.
2. US EPA, Federal Register, 78 (2013) 24073-24094 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-04-24/html/2013-07859.htm.
3. M.E.P.C., A.Q.S.I.Q., Emission Standard of Air Pollutants for Thermal Power Plants, GB13223-2011, China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, 2011.
4. Galbreath K.C., Zygarlicke C.J. Mercury speciation in coal combustion and gasification flue gases. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30:2421-2426.
5. Presto A.A., Granite E.J. Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:5601-5609.
6. Yang H., Xu Z., Fan M., Bland A.E., Judkins R.R. Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 146:1-11.
7. S. Chen, A.M. Rostam, R. Chang, Mercury removal from combustion flue gas by activated carbon injection: mass transfer effects, Prepr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem. 41 (1996) 442-446.
8. Wilcox J., Rupp E., Ying S.C., Lim D.H., Negreira A.S., Kirchofer A., Feng F., Lee K. Mercury adsorption and oxidation in coal combustion and gasification processes. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 90:4-20.
9. 3 at lower temperatures. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186:508-515.
10. 3 catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 225:68-75.
11. Granite E.J., Pennline H.W., Hargis R.A. Novel sorbents for mercury removal from flue gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39:1020-1029.
12. 5 catalysts in simulated low-rank coal combustion flue gas. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 169:186-193.
13. 2 composite and its effect on elemental mercury removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 195-196:218-225.
14. 2 mixed-oxide at low temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 243:117-123.
15. Pudasainee D., Lee S.J., Lee S.H., Kim J.H., Jang H.N., Cho S.J., Seo Y.C. Effect of selective catalytic reactor on oxidation and enhanced removal of mercury in coal-fired power plants. Fuel 2010, 89:804-809.
16. Marshneva V.I., Slavinskaya E.M., Kalinkina O.V., Odegova G.V., Moroz E.M., Lavrova G.V., Salanov A.N. The influence of support on the activity of monolayer vanadia-titania catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with ammonia. J. Catal. 1995, 155:171-183.
17. Rallo M., Heidel B., Brechtel K., Maroto-Valer M.M. Effect of SCR operation variables on mercury speciation. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 198-199:87-94.
18. Eom Y., Jeon S.H., Ngo T.A., Kim J., Lee T.G. Heterogeneous mercury reaction on a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst. Catal. Lett. 2008, 121:219-225.
19. Eswaran S., Stenger H.G. Understanding mercury conversion in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts. Energy Fuels 2005, 19:2328-2334.
20. 3 at lower temperatures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44:426-431.
21. Guo Y., Yan N., Yang S., Liu P., Wang J., Qu Z., Jia J. Conversion of elemental mercury with a novel membrane catalytic system at low temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 213-214:62-70.
22. Cao Y., Chen B., Wu J., Cui H., Smith J., Chen C.-K., Chu P., Pan W. Study of mercury oxidation by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst in a pilot-scale slipstream reactor at a utility boiler burning bituminous coal. Energy Fuels 2007, 21:145-156.
23. 2 commercial SCR catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:8136-8141.
24. Li Y., Murphy P.D., Wu C., Powers K.W., Bonzongo J.C.J. Development of silica/vanadia/titania catalysts for removal of elemental mercury from coal-combustion flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:5304-5309.
25. 2 De-NOx SCR catalysts. J. Catal. 1999, 187:419-435.
26. Bond G.C. Preparation and properties of vanadia/titania monolayer catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 1997, 157:91-103.
27. 2 catalysts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:1522-1527.
28. 3 catalysts. Top. Catal. 2000, 11:111-122.
29. 3 catalysts: reactivity and redox behavior. Appl. Catal. B 1999, 22:63-77.
30. 3 over supported vanadia catalysts. J. Catal. 1996, 161:211-221.
31. Topsoe N.Y., Dumesic J.A., Topsoe H. Vanadia-titania catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of nitric-oxide by ammonia: II. Studies of active sites and formulation of catalytic cycles. J. Catal. 1995, 151:241-252.
32. Cao Y., Gao Z., Zhu J., Wang Q., Huang Y., Chiu C., Parker B., Chu P., Pan W. Impacts of halogen additions on mercury oxidation, in a slipstream selective catalyst reduction (SCR), reactor when burning sub-bituminous coal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 42:256-261.
33. Eswaran S., Stenger H.G. Effect of halogens on mercury conversion in SCR catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89:1153-1159.
34. Lee C.W., Srivastava R.K., Ghorishi S.B., Karwowski J., Hastings T.W., Hirschi J.C. Pilot-scale study of the effect of selective catalytic reduction catalyst on mercury speciation in Illinois and Powder River Basin coal combustion flue gases. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56:643-649.
35. Niksa S., Fujiwara N. A predictive mechanism for mercury oxidation on selective catalytic reduction catalysts under coal-derived flue gas. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55:1866-1875.
36. 2 catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9:2441-2444.
37. He S., Zhou J., Zhu Y., Luo Z., Ni M., Cen K. Mercury oxidation over a vanadia-based selective catalytic reduction catalyst. Energy Fuels 2008, 23:253-259.
38. Pitoniak E., Wu C., Mazyck D.W., Powers K.W., Sigmund W. Adsorption enhancement mechanisms of silica-titania nanocomposites for elemental mercury vapor removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:1269-1274.
39. Dandekar A., Baker R.T.K., Vannice M.A. Characterization of activated carbon, graphitized carbon fibers and synthetic diamond powder using TPD and DRIFTS. Carbon 1998, 36:1821-1831.
40. Presto A.A., Granite E.J., Karash A., Hargis R.A., O'Dow W.J., Pennline H.W. A kinetic approach to the catalytic oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Energy Fuels 2006, 20:1941-1945.
41. Gao W., Liu Q., Wu C.-Y., Li H., Li Y., Yang J., Wu G. Kinetics of mercury oxidation in the presence of hydrochloric acid and oxygen over a commercial SCR catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220:53-60.
42. Yan N., Liu S., Chang S., Miller C. Method for the study of gaseous oxidants for the oxidation of mercury gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:5567-5574.