Food vs. fiber: An analysis of agricultural support policy in Turkey

Food Policy

Volumn 61, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-8

  Demirdöğen, Alper ^a   Olhan, Emine ^a   Chavas, Jean Paul ^b  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Acreage response; Agricultural support policy; Input support; Output support; Substitution effect; Turkey

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; COTTON; FOOD POLICY; FOOD SECURITY; SUBSTITUTION; TRADE-OFF;

TURKEY;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84958248472     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anadolu Agency, 2014. Türkiye büyümesini ihracata borçlu. (accessed; 18.06.2015). http://www.aa.com.tr/tr/haberler/441658--turkiye-buyumesini-ihracata-borclu.
2. Anderson K., Rausser G., Swinnen J. Political economy of public policies: insights from distortions to agricultural and food markets. J. Econ. Lit. 2013, 51:423-477.
3. Angrist J.D., Pischke J.S. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion 2008, Princeton University Press.
4. Bahadir, B., 2006. Çukurova Bölgesinde ve Ulusal Bazda Pamuk Üretiminin Rekabet Edebilirliği: Politika Analiz Matrisi (PAM) Yaklaşimi, Tarim Ekonomisi Anabilim Dali. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çukurova Üniversitesi.
5. Bhaskar A., Beghin J.C. Decoupled farm payments and the role of base acreage and yield updating under uncertainty. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2010, 92:849-858.
6. Biørn E. Regression systems for unbalanced panel data: a stepwise maximum likelihood procedure. J. Econometrics 2004, 122:281-291.
7. BÜMKO, 2014. Merkezi Yönetim Bütçesi Dengesi (2000-2012). (accessed; 11.05.2014). http://www.bumko.gov.tr/TR,185/merkezi-yonetim-butcesi.html.
8. Chavas J.P., Holt M.T. Acreage decisions under risk - the case of corn and soybeans. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1990, 72:529-538.
9. Chavas J.P., Pope R.D., Kao R.S. An analysis of the role of futures prices, cash prices and government programs in acreage response. Western J. Agric. Econ. 1983, 27-33.
10. Demirdöğen A., Olhan E. Üretimden Bağimsiz Desteklerin Etkileri: Genel Bir Değerlendirme. Tarim Ekonomisi Dergisi 2013.
11. Demirdöğen A., Olhan E. Türkiye ve Rusya Tarimsal Ticaretinin Politika Değişimi Açisindan Değerlendirilmesi. Tarim Ekonomisi Dergisi 2014.
12. Duflo E., Kremer M., Robinson J. Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. Am. Econ. Rev. 2011, 101:2350-2390.
13. FAOSTAT, 2014. Country Rank in the World, by Commodity. (accessed; 11.05.2014). http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx.
14. Girante, M.J., Goodwin, B.K., Featherstone, A., 2008. Farmers' crop acreage decisions in the presence of credit constraints: do decoupled payments matter? In: American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, pp. 27-29.
15. Goodwin B.K., Mishra A.K. Another look at decoupling: additional evidence on the production effects of direct payments. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2005, 87:1200-1210.
16. Goodwin B.K., Mishra A.K. Are "Decoupled" farm program payments really decoupled? An empirical evaluation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2006, 88:73-89.
17. Goodwin, B.K., Mishra, A.K., Kimhi, A., 2007. Household Time Allocation and Endogenous Farm Structure: Implications for the Design of Agricultural Policies. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Discussion Paper.
18. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. Pearson Education 2011.
19. GTH, 2013. Yazili Soru Önergesi (Sayi: 54045643/610-459). Gida, Tarim ve Hayvancilik Bakanliği Strateji Geliştirme Başkanliği.
20. GTH, 2014. Tarimsal Veriler (Ekim-2014). Gida, Tarim ve Hayvancilik Bakanliği, Tarimsal Araştirmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Tarimsal Ekonomi ve Politika Geliştirme Enstitüsü.
21. Hendricks N.P., Sumner D.A. The effects of policy expectations on crop supply, with an application to base updating. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2014, 96:903-923.
22. Hennessy D.A. The production effects of agricultural income support policies under uncertainty. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1998, 80:46-57.
23. Houck J.P., Ryan M.E. Supply analysis for corn in the United States: the impact of changing government programs. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1972, 54:184-191.
24. Key, N., Roberts, M.J., 2008. Do decoupled payments stimulate production? estimating the effect on program crop acreage using matching. In: American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, pp. 27-29.
25. Kilian S., Anton J., Salhofer K., Roder N. Impacts of 2003 CAP reform on land rental prices and capitalization. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:789-797.
26. Kirwan B.E. The incidence of US agricultural subsidies on farmland rental rates. J. Polit. Econ. 2009, 117:138-164.
27. Koo W.W., Lehman J.R. Effects of Government Programs on Corn, Soybeans, and Wheat Production in the US 1984, Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, North Dakota State University.
28. Lacroix A., Thomas A. Estimating the environmental impact of land and production decisions with multivariate selection rules and panel data. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2011, 93:784-802.
29. Larson, D.F., Martin, W., Sahin, S., Tsigas, M.E., 2014. Agricultural policies and trade paths in Turkey. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
30. Melikoglu M. Demand forecast for road transportation fuels including gasoline, diesel, LPG, bioethanol and biodiesel for Turkey between 2013 and 2023. Renew. Energy 2014, 64:164-171.
31. Moro D., Sckokai P. The impact of decoupled payments on farm choices: conceptual and methodological challenges. Food Policy 2013, 41:28-38.
32. Nerlove M. Estimates of the elasticities of supply of selected agricultural commodities. J. Farm Econ. 1956, 38:496-509.
33. Nguyen, M.C., Nguyen, H., 2010. XTSUR: stata module to estimate seemingly unrelated regression model on unbalanced panel data. Working Paper.
34. O'Donoghue E.J., Whitaker J.B. Do direct payments distort producers' decisions? An examination of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2010, 32:170-193.
35. OECD Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2014 2014, OECD Publishing.
36. OECD, 2014b. Producer and Consumer Support Estimates Database. (accessed; 11.05.2014). http://www.oecd.org/agriculture/agricultural-policies/producerandconsumersupportestimatesdatabase.htm.
37. Ozkan B., Karaman S. Acreage response for cotton regions in Turkey: an application of the bounds testing approach to cointegration. New Medit 2011, 10:42-50.
38. Pan S., Mohanty S., Welch M. India edible oil consumption: a censored incomplete demand approach. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2008, 40:821-835.
39. Petrick M., Zier P. Common agricultural policy effects on dynamic labour use in agriculture. Food Policy 2012, 37:671-678.
40. Platoni S., Sckokai P., Moro D. Panel data estimation techniques and farm-level data models. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2012, 94:1202-1217.
41. Şahinöz A. Neolitik'ten Günümüze Tarim Ekonomi ve Politikalari 2011, Turhan Kitabevi.
42. Shonkwiler J.S., Yen S.T. Two-step estimation of a censored system of equations. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1999, 81:972.
43. Sumner D.A. Production and trade effects of farm subsidies: discussion. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2005, 87:1229-1230.
44. Sumner D.A., Alston J.M., Glauber J.W. Evolution of the economics of agricultural policy. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2010, 92:403-423.
45. Tauchmann H. Efficiency of two-step estimators for censored systems of equations: Shonkwiler and Yen reconsidered. Appl. Econ. 2005, 37:367-374.
46. The Official Gazette, 2012. Çiftçi Kayit Sistemine Dahil Olan Çiftçilere Mazot, Gübre ve Toprak Analizi Destekleme Ödemesi Yapilmasina Dair Tebliğ (Sayi: 28324).
47. TurkStat, 2014a. Crop Production Statistics. < (accessed; 11.07.2014). http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001.
48. TurkStat, 2014b. Labour Force Statistics. < (accessed; 11.05.2014). http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1007.
49. World Bank Implementation Completion and Results Report (IBRD-46310) on a Loan in the Amount of US$600 Milion to the Republic of Turkey for an Agricultural Reform Implementation Project 2009, World Bank, Washington, DC.
50. World Bank, 2014. World Development Indicators. (accessed; 11.05.2014). http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx.
51. Yen S.T., Lin B.H. A sample selection approach to censored demand systems. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2006, 88:742-749.
52. Yi F., Sun D., Zhou Y. Grain subsidy, liquidity constraints and food security-impact of the grain subsidy program on the grain-sown areas in China. Food Policy 2015, 50:114-124.