Estimating the environmental impact of land and production decisions with multivariate selection rules and panel data

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 780-798

  Lacroix, Anne ^a   Thomas, Alban ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b TOULOUSE SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (France)

Author keywords

environmental impact; land use; panel data; sample selection

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ESTIMATION METHOD; LAND USE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PANEL DATA; RUNOFF;

EID: 79960378227     PISSN: 00029092     EISSN: 14678276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aar008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Catsiapis, G., and C. Robinson. 1982. Sample Selection Bias with Multiple Selection Rules. Journal of Econometrics 18: 351-368.
2. Chakir, R., and A. Thomas. 2003. Simulated Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Firms Demand Systems with Corner Solutions and Panel Data: Application to Industrial Energy Demand. Revue d'Economie Politique 6: 773-799.
3. Chamberlain, G. 1984. Panel data. In Handbook of Econometrics, ed. Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator, 1247-1317. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4. Diewert,W. E., and T. J. Wales. 1987. Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions. Econometrica 55: 43-68.
5. Fezzi C., and I. J. Bateman. 2009. Structural Agricultural Land Use Modelling. Working Paper, University of East Anglia.
6. Guyomard, H., M. Baudry, and A. Carpentier. 1996. Estimating Crop Supply Response in the Presence of Farm Programmes: Application to the CAP. European Journal of Agricultural Economics 23: 401-420.
7. Hennessy, D. A. 2006. On Monoculture and the Structure of Crop Rotations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 900-914. (Pubitemid 44575310)
8. Just, R. E. 1993. Discovering Production and Supply Relationships: Present Status and Future Opportunities. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 61: 11-40.
9. Lacroix, A., F. Laurent, D. Ruelland, and E. Sauboua. 2006. Nitrate Pollution Risk Assessment: From the Model to the Indicator. International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology 5: 206-223.
10. Langpap,C., I. Hascic,and J.Wu. 2008. Protecting Watershed Ecosystems through Targeted Local Land Use Policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90: 684-700. (Pubitemid 351850882)
11. Lee, L.-F., and M.M. Pitt. 1987. Microeconometric Models of Rationing, Imperfect Markets and Non-Negativity Constraints. Journal of Econometrics 36: 89-110.
12. Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
13. Meisinger, J. J., and G. W. Randall. 1991. Estimating Nitrogen Budgets for Soil-Crop Systems. In Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability, ed. R.F.Follett,D. R.Keeney,and R.M. Cruse, 85-124. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
14. Millimet, D. L., and R. Tchernis. 2009. Estimating High-Dimensional Demand Systems in the Presence of Many Binding Non-Negativity Constraints. Journal of Econometrics 147: 384-395.
15. Moore,M. R., and D. H. Negri. 1992.A Multi-Crop Production Model of Irrigated Agriculture, Applied toWaterAllocationPolicy of the Bureau of Reclamation. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17: 29-43.
16. Moro, D., and P. Sckokai. 1999. Modelling the CAPArable Crop Regime in Italy: Degree of Decoupling and Impact ofAgenda 2000. Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales 53: 50-73.
17. Moschini, G. 1998. The Semiflexible Almost Ideal Demand System. European Economic Review 42: 349-364. (Pubitemid 128403431)
18. Mundlak, Y. 1978. On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data. Econometrica 46: 69-85.
19. Orazem, P. F., and J. A. Miranowski. 1994. A Dynamic Model of Acreage Allocation with General and Crop-Specific Soil Capital. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 385-395.
20. Papke,L. E., and J. M.Wooldridge. 2008. Panel Data Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to Test Pass Rates. Journal of Econometrics 145: 121-133.
21. Perali, F., and J. P. Chavas. 2000. Estimation of Censored Demand Equations from Large Cross-Section Data.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 1022-1037.
22. Plantinga, A. J. 1996. The Effects of Agricultural Policies on Land Use and Environmental Quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 1082-1091.
23. Shonkwiler, J. S., and S.T.Yen. 1999.Two-Step Estimation of a Censored System of Equations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 972-982. (Pubitemid 129527351)
24. Thomas, A. 2003. A Dynamic Model of On-Farm Integrated Nitrogen Management. European Journal of Agricultural Economics 30: 439-460. (Pubitemid 38317913)
25. Vella, F. 1998. Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey. Journal of Human Resources 33: 127-169. (Pubitemid 128603279)
26. Wooldridge, J. M. 1995. Selection Corrections for Panel Data models under Conditional MeanIndependenceAssumptions. Journal of Econometrics 68: 115-132.
27. Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Wu, J., R. M. Adams, C. Kling, and K. Tanaka. 2004. From Microlevel Decisions to Landscape Changes: An Assessment of Agricultural Conservation Policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 26-41. (Pubitemid 38256853)
29. Yen, S. T. 2005. A Multivariate Sample-Selection Model: Estimating Cigarette and Alcohol Demands with Zero Observations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 453-466. (Pubitemid 40687073)
30. Yen, S. T., and B.-H. Lin. 2005. A Sample Selection Approach to Censored Demand Systems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 742-749.
31. Yen, S. T., B. H. Lin, and D. M. Smallwood. 2003. Quasi-and Simulated Likelihood Approaches to Censored Demand Systems: Food Consumption by Food Stamp Recipients in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 458-478. (Pubitemid 36624254)