The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities

Virchows Archiv

Volumn 468, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 75-81

  van den Tweel, Jan G ^a   Wittekind, Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Autopsy; Future; History; Quality tool

Indexed keywords

AUTOPSY; CLINICAL MEDICINE; COMPENSATION; CURRICULUM; FAMILY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTORY; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

AUTOPSY; HISTORY, 15TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 16TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 17TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 18TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HISTORY, MEDIEVAL; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84958114783     PISSN: 09456317     EISSN: 14322307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1833-5     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Benivieni A (1507) De abditis nonnullis ac mirandis morborum et sanationum causis, Filippo Giunti, Florence
2. Bonet T (1679) Sepulchretum sive anatomia practica ex cadaveribis morbo denatis. Leonardus Chouet, Geneva
3. Boerhaave H (1751) Opera Omnia complectentia. Atrocis, nec descripti prius, morbihistoria: 387-404, Venice, Laurentius Basilius
4. Morgagni GB (1761) De sedibus et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis (Venetiae)
5. Sedivy R (2004) Rokitansky and the Vienna Medical School–from the philosophy of nature to natural science. Wien Med Wochenschr. 154(19-20):443–453
6. Virchow R (1884) Die Sektions –Technik im Leichenhause des Charité-Krankenhauses. Berlin, 3rd edition, August Hirschwalt
7. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M (1983) The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308:1000–1005
8. Shojania KG,, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman M (2003)Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 289:2849–2856
9. Wittschieber D, Klauschen F, Kimmritz AC, von Winterfeld M, Kamphues C, Scholman HJ, Erbersdobler A, Pfeiffer H, Denkert C, Dietel M, Weichert W, Budczies J, Stenzinger A (2012) Who is at risk for diagnostic discrepancies? Comparison of pre- and postmortal diagnoses in 1800 patients of 3 medical decades in East and West Berlin. PLoS ONE 2012:7(5)
10. Moorchung N, Singh V, Mishra A, Patrikar S, Kakkar S, Dutta V (2013) Is necropsy obsolete—an audit of the clinical autopsy over six decades: a study from Indian sub continent. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 56:372–377
11. Kuijpers CC, Fronczek J, van de Goot FR, Niessen HW, van Diest PJ, Jiwa M (2014) The value of autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: discrepant findings persist. J Clin Pathol 67:512–519
12. Sblano S, Arpaio A, Zotti F, Marzullo A, Bonsignore A, Dell’Erba A (2014) Discrepancies between clinical and autoptic diagnoses in Italy: evaluation of 879 consecutive cases at the "Policlinico of Bari" teaching hospital in the period 1990-2009. Ann Ist Super Sanita 50:44–48
13. Schwanda-Burger S, Moch H, Muntwyler J, Salomon F (2012) Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study. Mod Pathol 25:777–78313
14. Winters B, Custer J, Galvagno SM, Colontuoni E, Capoor SG, Lee HW, Goode V, Robinson K, Nakhasi A, Pronovost P, Newman-Toker D (2012) Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systemic review of autopsy studies. BMJ Qual Saf.21:894–902
15. Fares AF, Cury PM, Lobo SM (2011) Clinical-pathological discrepancies in critically ill patients with difficult premortem diagnoses. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 23:442–447
16. Khawaja O, Khalil M, Zmeili O, Soubani AO (2013) Major discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill cancer patients: is autopsy still useful? Avicenna J Med 3:63–67
17. Blanco C, Steigman C, Probst N, Stroud M, Bhutta AT, Dyamenahalli U, Imamura M, Prodhan P (2014) Discrepancies between autopsy and clinical findings among patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support. ASAIO J 60:207–210
18. Roosen J, Frans E, Wilmer A, et al. (2000) Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 75:562–567
19. Pastores SM, Dulu A, Voigt L, et al. (2007) Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients. Crit Care 11:R48
20. Tavora F, Crowder CD, Sun CC, Burke AP (2008) Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. A comparison of university, community, and private autopsy practices. Am J Clin Pathol 129:102–109
21. Zampieri F, Rizzo S, Thiene G, Basso C (2015) The clinico-pathological conference, based upon Giovanni Battista’s legacy, remains of fundamental importance even in the era of the vanishing autopsy. Virchows Arch. May 20. [Epub ahead of print]
22. Hill RB, Anderson RE (1991) The autopsy crisis reexamined: the case for a national autopsy policy. The Milbank Quarterly 69:51–78
23. Landefeld CS, Goldman L (1989) The autopsy in clinical medicine (editorial). Mayo Clin Proc 64:1185–1189
24. Anderson RE, Hill RB, Key CR (1989) The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades. Towards an understanding of necessary fallibility. JAMA 261:1610–1617
25. Saracci R (1988) Problems with used of autopsy results as a yardstick in medicala audit and epidemiology. Qual Assur Health Care 5:339–344
26. Hill RB (1993) The current status of autopsies in medical care in the USA. Qual Assur Health Care 5:309–313
27. Setlow VP (1996) The need for a national autopsy policy. MJ Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:773–777
28. Start RD, Cotton DWK (1993) The meta-autopsy. Changing techniques and attitudes towards the autopsy. Qual Assur Health Care 5:326–332
29. Hull MJ, Nazarian RM, Wheeler AE, et al. (2007) Resident physicians opinions on autopsy importance and procurement. Human Pathol 38:342–250
30. Fernando LBM (2008) Place of autopsy in quality assurance of curative service. Galle Medical J 13:51–54
31. Horowitz RE, Naritoku WY (2007) The autopsy as a performance measure and teaching tool. Human Pathol 38:688–695
32. Kahl A (2010) Public perceptions of hospital autopsies: results of a representative survey. Pathologe 32:345–348(in German)
33. Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, et al (2013) Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 382:223–233
34. Aghayev E, Thali MJ, Sonnenschein M, Jackowski C, Dirnhofer R, Vock P (2007) Post-mortem tissue sampling using computed tomography guidance. Forensic Sci Int 166(2–3):199–203
35. Westphal SE, Apitzsch J, Penzkofer T, Mahnken AH, Knüchel R (2012) Virtual CT autopsy in clinical pathology: feasibility in clinical autopsies. Virchows Arch 461:211–219
36. Weustink AC, Hunink MG, van Dijke CF, et al. (2009) Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology 250:897–904
37. Van der Linden A, Blokker BM, Kap M, Weustink AC, Robertus JL, Riegman PH, Oosterhuis WJ. (2014) Post-mortem tissue biopsies obtained at minimally invasive autopsy: an RNA-quality analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 22;9 (12):e115675
38. Friemann J (2014) Indikationsliste zur Durchfürung klinischer Obduktionen. Pathologe 4:402–403
39. Van den Tweel JG (2008) Autopsy pathology should become a recognized subspecialty. Virchows Arch 452:585–587
40. Arena V, Capelli A (2009) Autopsy pathology: a subspecialty that must be recognized. Hum Pathol 40:903–904