Noninvasive Imaging of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection by Ultrasound Detection of Microbubbles Targeted to T-lymphocytes in Rats

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 82-91

  Grabner, Alexander ^a   Muhlmeister M ^a   Pawelski, H ^a   Biermann, C ^a   Bettinger, T ^b   Pavenstadt H ^a   Schlatter, E ^a   Tiemann, K ^c   Reuter, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b Bracco Suisse SA   (Switzerland)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

diagnostic radiology; microbubbles; molecular imaging; transplantation; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; CD3 ANTIGEN;

ACUTE DISEASE; ANIMAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE MODEL; ECHOGRAPHY; GRAFT REJECTION; IMMUNOLOGY; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LEWIS RAT; MALE; MICROBUBBLE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; RAT; T LYMPHOCYTE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES; ANTIGENS, CD3; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MICROBUBBLES; MOLECULAR IMAGING; RATS; RATS, INBRED LEW; T-LYMPHOCYTES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84958102067     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: 14388782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385796     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Grabner A., Kentrup D., Edemir B. et al. PET with 18F-FDG-Labeled T Lymphocytes for Diagnosis of Acute Rat Renal Allograft Rejection. Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 2013; 54 1147 1153 10.2967/jnumed.112.109231.
2. Rush D. Protocol transplant biopsies: An underutilized tool in kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol: 2006; 1 138 143 10.2215/CJN.00390705
3. Racusen L. C., Solez K., Colvin R. B. et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int: 1999; 55 713 723 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00299.x
4. Bettinger T., Bussat P., Tardy I. et al. Ultrasound molecular imaging contrast agent binding to both E- And P-selectin in different species. Invest Radiol: 2012; 47 516 523 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31825cc605
5. Morath C., Ritz E., Zeier M. Protocol biopsy: what is the rationale and what is the evidence? Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation: 2003; 18 644 647 10.1093/ndt/gfg036
6. Schlosser T., Pohl C., Kuntz-Hehner S. et al. Echoscintigraphy: A new imaging modality for the reduction of color blooming and acoustic shadowing in contrast sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol: 2003; 29 985 991
7. Chapman J. R. Do protocol transplant biopsies improve kidney transplant outcomes? Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension: 2012; 21 580 586 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32835903f4
8. Solez K., Colvin R. B., Racusen L. C. et al. Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology: Updates and Future Directions. Am J Transplant: 2008; 8 753 760 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02159.x
9. Schwarz A., Hiss M., Gwinner W. et al. Course and relevance of arteriovenous fistulas after renal transplant biopsies. Am J Transplant: 2008; 8 826 831 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02160.x
10. El-Mekresh M., Osman Y., Ali-El-Dein B. et al. Urological complications after living-donor renal transplantation. BJU Int: 2001; 87 295 306
11. Feige J. N., Sage D., Wahli W. et al. PixFRET, an ImageJ plug-in for FRET calculation that can accommodate variations in spectral bleed-throughs. Microsc Res Tech: 2005; 68 51 58 10.1002/jemt.20215
12. Muthukumar T., Dadhania D., Ding R. et al. Messenger RNA for FOXP3 in the urine of renal-allograft recipients. N Engl J Med: 2005; 353 2342 2351 10.1056/NEJMoa051907
13. Suthanthiran M., Schwartz J. E., Ding R. et al. Urinary-Cell mRNA Profile and Acute Cellular Rejection in Kidney Allografts. N Engl J Med: 2013; 369 20 31 10.1056/NEJMoa1215555
14. Meier-Kriesche H. U., Schold J. D., Srinivas T. R. et al. Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era. Am J Transplant: 2004; 4 378 383
15. Cosgrove D. O., Chan K. E. Renal transplants: what ultrasound can and cannot do. Ultrasound Q: 2008; 24 02 77 87; quiz 141-2 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31817c5e46
16. Opelz G., Döhler B. Collaborative Transplant Study Report Influence of time of rejection on long-term graft survival in renal transplantation. Transplantation: 2008; 85 661 666 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181661695
17. Radermacher J., Mengel M., Ellis S. et al. The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival. N Engl J Med: 2003; 349 115 124 10.1056/NEJMoa022602
18. Mehrsai A., Salem S., Ahmadi H. et al. Role of resistive index measurement in diagnosis of acute rejection episodes following successful kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc: 2009; 41 2805 2807 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.050
19. El Ters M., Grande J. P., Keddis M. T. et al. Kidney Allograft Survival After Acute Rejection, the Value of Follow-Up Biopsies. American Journal of Transplantation: 2013; 13 2334 2341 10.1111/ajt.12370
20. Grzelak P., Szymczyk K., Strzelczyk J. et al. Perfusion of kidney graft pyramids and cortex in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the determination of the cause of delayed graft function. Ann Transplant: 2011; 16 48 53
21. Benozzi L., Cappelli G., Granito M. et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography in early kidney graft dysfunction. Transplant Proc: 2009; 41 1214 1215 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.03.029
22. Cornell L. D., Smith R. N., Colvin R. B. Kidney transplantation: Mechanisms of rejection and acceptance. Annu Rev Pathol: 2008; 3 189 220 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151508
23. Rosenblum J. M., Shimoda N., Schenk A. D. et al. CXC Chemokine Ligand (CXCL) 9 and CXCL10 Are Antagonistic Costimulation Molecules during the Priming of Alloreactive T Cell Effectors. The Journal of Immunology: 2010; 184 3450 3460 10.4049/jimmunol.0903831
24. Nankivell B. J., Alexander S. I. Rejection of the kidney allograft. N Engl J Med: 2010; 363 15 1451 1462 10.1056/NEJMra0902927
25. Lindner J. R. Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Nat Rev Cardiol: 2009; 6 07 475 481 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.77
26. Reuter S., Schnöckel U., Schröter R. et al. Non-Invasive Imaging of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection in Rats Using Small Animal 18F-FDG-PET. PLoS ONE: 2009; 4 e5296 Zoccali C, ed. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005296.t003
27. Grabner A., Kentrup D., Schnöckel U. et al. Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET. JoVE: 2013; doi:10.3791/4240
28. Reuter S., Velic A., Edemir B. et al. Protective role of NHE-3 inhibition in rat renal transplantation undergoing acute rejection. Pflugers Arch: 2008; 456 1075 1084 10.1007/s00424-008-0484-7
29. Reuter S., Schnöckel U., Edemir B. et al. Potential of Noninvasive Serial Assessment of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection by 18F-FDG PET to Monitor Treatment Efficiency. Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 2010; 51 1644 1652 10.2967/jnumed.110.078550
30. Perico N., Cattaneo D., Sayegh M. H. et al. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet: 2004; 364 9447 1814 1827 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17406-0
31. Kondo I. Leukocyte-Targeted Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Can Assess the Degree of Acute Allograft Rejection in a Rat Cardiac Transplantation Model. Circulation: 2004; 109 08 1056 1061 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115586.25803.D5
32. Weller G. ER, Lu E., Csikari M. M. et al. Ultrasound imaging of acute cardiac transplant rejection with microbubbles targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Circulation: 2003; 108 218 224 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080287.74762.60
33. Fischer T., Dieckhöfer J., Mühler M. et al. The use of contrast-enhanced US in renal transplant: First results and potential clinical benefit. Eur Radiol Suppl: 2005; 15 05 e109 e116 10.1007/s10406-005-0173-y
34. Peters A. M., Danpure H. J., Osman S. et al. Clinical experience with 99mTc-hexamethylpropylene-amineoxime for labelling leucocytes and imaging inflammation. Lancet: 1986; 2 946 949
35. Dumarey N. Imaging with FDG labeled leukocytes: Is it clinically useful? Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging: 2009; 53 89 94
36. Doudet D. J., Cornfeldt M. L., Honey C. R. et al. PET imaging of implanted human retinal pigment epithelial cells in the MPTP-induced primate model of Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol: 2004; 189 361 368 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.06.009
37. Forstrom L. A., Dunn W. L., Mullan B. P. et al. Biodistribution and dosimetry of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose labelled leukocytes in normal human subjects. Nucl Med Commun: 2002; 23 721 725
38. Claudon M., Dietrich C., Choi B. et al. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver - Update 2012. Ultraschall in Med: 2013; 34 11 29 10.1055/s-0032-1325499
39. Dietrich C., Averkiou M., Correas J. M. et al. An EFSUMB Introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for Quantification of Tumour Perfusion. Ultraschall in Med: 2012; 33 344 351 10.1055/s-0032-1313026