Elementary school children contribute to environmental research as citizen scientists

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2015, Pages

  Miczajka, Victoria L ^a,b   Klein, Alexandra Maria ^a,b   Pufal, Gesine ^a,b  

^a LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; HEIGHT; HUMAN; PHENOLOGY; PRIMARY SCHOOL; SCIENTIST; SEED PREDATION; SKILL; SPECIES; VEGETATION; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; PERSONNEL; PLANT; PLANT SEED; RESEARCH; SCHOOL;

CHILD; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; PLANTS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCHOOLS; SEEDS;

EID: 84958044993     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143229     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, Matulich KL, et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature. 2012; 486: 105-10. doi: 10. 1038/nature11118 PMID: 22678289
2. Carwardine J, O'Connor T, Legge S, Mackey B, Possingham HP, Martin TG. Prioritizing threat management for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Lett. 2012; 5: 196-204.
3. Bickford D, Posa MRC, Qie L, Campos-Arceiz A, Kudavidanage EP. Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv. 2012; 151: 74-6.
4. Lindemann-Matthies P, Bose E. How Many Species Are There? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Hum Ecol. 2008; 36: 731-42.
5. Balvanera P, Siddique I, Dee L, Paquette A, Isbell F, Gonzalez A, et al. Linking biodiversity and ecosystem services: Current uncertainties and the necessary next steps. BioScience. 2014; 64: 49-57.
6. Thomas M, Dawson JC, Goldringer I, Bonneuil C. Seed exchanges, a key to analyze crop diversity dynamics in farmer-led on-farm conservation. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2011; 58: 321-38.
7. Tilman D, Reich PB, Isbell F. Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109: 10394-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208240109 PMID: 22689971
8. Henderson S. Citizen science comes of age. Front Ecol Environ. 2012; 10: 283-283.
9. Dickinson J, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain R, Martin J, et al. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front Ecol Environ. 2012; 10: 291-7.
10. Oberhauser K, Prysby M. Citizen science: Creating a research army for conservation. Am Entomol. 2008; 54: 103-5.
11. Havens K, Vitt P, Masi S. Citizen science on a local scale: The Plants of Concern program. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2012; 10: 321-3.
12. Chandler M, Bebber DP, Castro S, Lowman MD, Muoria P, Oguge N, et al. International citizen science: Making the local global. Front Ecol Environ. 2012; 10: 328-31.
13. Niven D, Butcher G, Bancroft G. Northward shifts in early winter abundance. Am Birds 2010; The 109TH. 1-6.
14. Hepper FN. Phenological records of English garden plants in Leeds (Yorkshire) and Richmond (Surrey) from 1946 to 2002. An analysis relating to global warming. Biodivers Conserv. 2003; 12: 2503-20.
15. Kremen C, Ullman KS, Thorp RW. Evaluating the quality of citizen-scientist data on pollinator communities. Conserv Biol. 2011; 25: 607-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01657.x PMID: 21507061
16. Braschler B. Successfully implementing a citizen-scientist approach to insect monitoring in a resourcepoor country. BioScience. 2009; 59: 103-4.
17. Crall AW, Newman GJ, Stohlgren TJ, Holfelder KA, Graham J, Waller DM. Assessing citizen science data quality: An invasive species case study. Conserv Lett. 2011; 4: 433-42.
18. Genet KS, Sargent LG. Evaluation of methods and data quality from a volunteer-based amphibian call survey. Wildl Soc Bull. 2003; 31: 703-14.
19. Low B, Sundaresan SR, Fischhoff IR, Rubenstein DI. Partnering with local communities to identify conservation priorities for endangered Grevy's zebra. Biol Conserv. 2009; 142: 1548-55.
20. Galloway A, Tudor M, Haegen W. The reliability of citizen science: A case study of Oregon white oak stand surveys. Wildl Soc Bull. 2006; 34: 1425-9.
21. Canfield DE, Brown CD, Bachmann RW, Hoyer M V. Volunteer lake monitoring: Testing the reliability of data collected by the Florida LAKEWATCH Program. Lake and Reservoir Management. 2002: 1-9.
22. Bonney R, Ballard HL, Jordan R, McCallie E, Phillips T, Shirk J, et al. Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Cent Adv Informal Sci Educ. 2009; 1-58.
23. Cohn J. Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience. 2008; 58: 192-7.
24. Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ. 2006; 30: 159-167. PMID: 17108243
25. Benware CA, Deci EL. Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. Am Educ Res J. 1984; 21: 755-765.
26. Shirk J, Ballard H, Wilderman CC, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Jordan RC, et al. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecol Soc Am. 2012; 17: 29.
27. Türke M, Blattmann T, Knop E, Kindermann A, Prestele J, Marquez L, et al. Weeds and endangered herbs have unforeseen dispersal helpers in the agri-environment: Gastropods and earthworms. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2013; 1-4.
28. Bogner FX. The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. J Environ Educ. 1998; 29: 17-29.
29. Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc. 2007; 12: 1-11.
30. Evans C, Abrams E, Reitsma R. The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conserv Biol. 2005; 19: 589-94.
31. Carstens A, Leißing G, Ommen T, Rahe P, Stein M, Wald A, et al. Kerncurriculum für die Grundschule Sachunterricht Niedersachsen. Hrsg vom Niedersächsischen Kultusministerium 2006. 1-35. Available: http://db2.nibis.de/1db/cuvo/datei/kc-gs-sachunterricht-nib.pdf
32. Renz W, Keßler E, Kelpe M, Bischoff M, Michalik K. Bildungsplan Grundschule Sachunterricht, Hamburg. Freie und Hansestadt Hambg Behörde für Schule und Berufsbildung, Landesinstitut für Lehrerbildung und Schulentwicklung, Math Unterricht. 2011; 1-35. Available: http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/2481914/data/sachunterricht-gs.pdf.
33. Pufal G, Klein A-M. Post-dispersal seed predation of three grassland species in a plant diversity experiment. J Plant Ecol 2013; 6: 468-79.
34. Lemke A, von der Lippe M, Kowarik I. New opportunities for an old method: using fluorescent colours to measure seed dispersal. J Appl Ecol. 2009; 46: 1122-8.
35. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. 2015. Available: http://www.r-project.org/.
36. Dönges C, Juraschek B, Kind R, Krüger U-H, Röttger A, Struckmann W. Kerncurriculum für das Gymnasium Mathematik Niedersachsen. 2006; 1-41.
37. Wynn K. Children's understanding of counting. Cognition. 1990; 36: 155-93. PMID: 2225756
38. Galton M, Hargreaves L, Pell T. Group work and whole-class teaching with 11-to 14-year olds compared. Cambridge J Educ. Routledge. 2009; 39: 119-140.
39. Izard CE, Schultz D, Fine SE, Youngstorm E, Ackerman BP. Temperament, cognitive ability, emotion knowledge, and adaptive social behavior. Imagin Cogn Pers. 2000; 19: 305-330.
40. Bouillion LM, Gomez LM. Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. J Res Sci Teach. 2001; 38: 878-898.
41. Prince M. Does Active Learning Work ? A review of the research. J Eng Educ. 2004; 93: 223-231.
42. Magnuson CS, Starr MF. How early is too early to begin life career planning? The importance of the elementary school years. J Career Dev. 2000; 27: 89-101.
43. Nissen MJ, Bullemer P. Attentional requirements of learning : Evidence from performance measures. Cogn Psychol. 1987; 19: 1-32.
44. Danielsen F, Jensen P M, Burgess ND, Altamirano R, Alviola PA, Andrianandrasana H, et al. A multicountry assessment of tropical resource monitoring by local communities. BioScience. 2014; 64: 236-51.
45. Droege S. Just because you paid them doesn't mean their data are better. Citiz Sci Toolkit Conf. 2007; 1-14.
46. Schmeller DS, Henry P-Y, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clobert J, Dziock F, et al. Advantages of volunteerbased biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conserv Biol. 2009; 23: 307-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739. 2008.01125.x PMID: 19183201