Equating accelerometer estimates among youth: The Rosetta Stone 2

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 242-249

  Brazendale, Keith ^a   Beets, Michael W ^a   Bornstein, Daniel B ^a   Moore, Justin B ^a   Pate, Russell R ^a   Weaver, Robert G ^a   Falck, Ryan S ^a   Chandler, Jessica L ^a   Andersen, Lars B ^b,c   Anderssen, Sigmund A ^c   Cardon, Greet ^d   Cooper, Ashley ^e   Davey, Rachel ^f   Froberg, Karsten ^b   Hallal, Pedro C ^g   Janz, Kathleen F ^h   Kordas, Katarzyna ^e   Kriemler, Susi ⁱ   Puder, Jardena J ^j   Reilly, John J ^k   Salmon, Jo ^l   Sardinha, Luis B ^m   Timperio, Anna ^k   van Sluijs, Esther M F ⁿ   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c Norwegian School of Sports Sciences   (Norway)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

^g FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^h UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^j UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^k UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^l DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^m UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Children; Cutpoints; Measurement; MVPA; Policy; Public health

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ACCELEROMETRY; ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLAND ALTMAN PLOT; CHILD; CUTPOINT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JUVENILE; LIMIT OF AGREEMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MODERATE TO VIGOROUS INTENSITY PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RELIABILITY; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDATION STUDY; EXERCISE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARDS;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 84958042348     PISSN: 14402440     EISSN: 18781861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Reilly J.J., Penpraze V., Hislop J., et al. Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data. Arch Dis Child 2008, 93(7):614-619.
2. Cliff D.P., Okely A.D. Comparison of two sets of accelerometer cut-off points for calculating moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in young children. J Phys Act Health 2007, 4(4):509.
3. Trost S.G., McIver K.L., Pate R.R. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2005, 37(11 (Suppl)):S531-S543.
4. Kim Y., Beets M.W., Welk G.J. Everything you wanted to know about selecting the right Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but. . .: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport 2012, 15(4):311-321.
5. Trost S.G. State of the art reviews: measurement of physical activity in children and adolescents. Am J Lifestyle Med 2007, 1(4):299-314.
6. Freedson P.S., Melanson E., Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1998, 30(5):777-781.
7. Pate R.R., Almeida M.J., McIver K.L., et al. Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children. Obesity 2006, 14(11):2000-2006.
8. Puyau M.R., Adolph A.L., Vohra F.A., et al. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res 2002, 10(3):150-157.
9. Beets M.W., Bornstein D., Dowda M., et al. Compliance with national guidelines for physical activity in US preschoolers: measurement and interpretation. Pediatrics 2011, 127(4):658-664.
10. Guinhouya C.B., Hubert H., Soubrier S., et al. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among children: discrepancies in accelerometry-based cut-off points. Obesity 2006, 14(5):774-777.
11. Bornstein D.B., Beets M.W., Byun W., et al. Accelerometer-derived physical activity levels of preschoolers: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport 2011, 14(6):504-511.
12. Bornstein D.B., Beets M.W., Byun W., et al. Equating accelerometer estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: in search of the Rosetta Stone. J Sci Med Sport 2011, 14(5):404-410.
13. Birch L.L., Parker L., Burns A. Early childhood obesity prevention policies 2011, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
14. Routen A.C., Upton D., Edwards M.G., et al. Discrepancies in accelerometer-measured physical activity in children due to cut-point non-equivalence and placement site. J Sport Sci 2012, 30(12):1303-1310.
15. Trost S.G., Loprinzi P.D., Moore R., et al. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2011, 43(7):1360-1368.
16. Ekelund U., Luan Ja Sherar L.B., et al. Moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. J Am Med Assoc 2012, 307(7):704-712.
17. Sherar L.B., Griew P., Esliger D.W., et al. International children's accelerometry database (ICAD): design and methods. BMC Public Health 2011, 11(1):485.
18. Kim Y., Beets M.W., Pate R.R., et al. The effect of reintegrating Actigraph accelerometer counts in preschool children: comparison using different epoch lengths. J Sci Med Sport 2013, 16(2):129-134.
19. Trost S.G., Rosenkranz R.R., Dzewaltowski D. Physical activity levels among children attending after-school programs. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2008, 40(4):622-629.
20. Nilsson A., Ekelund U., Yngve A., et al. Assessing physical activity among children with accelerometers using different time sampling intervals and placements. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2002, 14(1):87-96.
21. Cain K.L., Sallis J.F., Conway T.L., et al. Using accelerometers in youth physical activity studies: a review of methods. J Phys Act Health 2013, 10(3):437-450.
22. Mattocks C., Leary S., Ness A., et al. Calibration of an accelerometer during free-living activities in children. Int J Pediatr Obes 2007, 2(4):218-226.
23. Trost S.G., Pate R.R., Freedson P.S., et al. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed?. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2000, 32(2):426-431.
24. Freedson P., Pober D., Janz K. Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2005, 37(11 Suppl):S523.
25. van Cauwenberghe E., Labarque V., Trost S.G., et al. Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children. Int J Pediatr Obes 2011, 6(2-2):e582-e589.
26. Evenson K.R., Catellier D.J., Gill K., et al. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sport Sci 2008, 26(14):1557-1565.
27. Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc, Ser B (Methodol) 1974, 36(2):111-147.
28. Martin Bland J., Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 327(8476):307-310.
29. Loprinzi P.D., Lee H., Cardinal B.J., et al. The relationship of actigraph accelerometer cut-points for estimating physical activity with selected health outcomes: results from NHANES 2003-06. Res Q Exerc Sport 2012, 83(3):422-430.
30. Treuth M.S., Schmitz K., Catellier D.J., et al. Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2004, 36(7):1259.