Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology cycle outcomes is not simple

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 893-894

  Doody, Kevin J ^a  

^a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYOPRESERVATION; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE DATABASE; SHORT SURVEY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RESEARCH; TRENDS;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RESEARCH REPORT; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84957916498     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.026     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. D. Kulak, S.K. Jindal, O. Cheongeun, S.S. Morelli, S. Kratka, and P.G. McGovern Reporting in vitro fertilization cycles to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART) database: where have all the cycles gone? Fertil Steril 105 2016 927 931
2. Federal Register. September 1, 2000 (Vol. 65, No. 171). DOCID: FR Doc 00-22425.
3. K. Doody Cryopreservation and delayed embryo transfer-assisted reproductive technology registry and reporting implications Fertil Steril 102 2014 27 31
4. 102 nd US Congress. Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992. Public Law No. 102-493, 42 USC 263a-1 et seq.
5. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. SART patient predictor. Available at: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/Predictor/Patient. Last accessed February 4, 2016.