Cryopreservation and delayed embryo transfer-Assisted reproductive technology registry and reporting implications

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 27-31

  Doody, Kevin J ^a  

^a Center for Assisted Reproduction   (United States)

Author keywords

assisted reproduction; reporting; Success rates

Indexed keywords

CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; REVIEW;

ASSISTED REPRODUCTION; REPORTING; SUCCESS RATES;

CRYOPRESERVATION; DATA MINING; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE BANKS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84903383569     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.048     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Medical Research International The American Fertility Society Special Interest Group In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in the United States: 1985 and 1986 results from the National IVF/ET Registry Fertil Steril 49 1988 212 215
2. J. Toner Progress we can be proud of: U.S. trends in assisted reproduction over the first 20 years Fertil Steril 78 2002 943 950
3. E.Y. Adashi, and R. Wyden Public reporting of clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs: implications for other medical and surgical procedures JAMA 306 2011 1135 1136
4. 102nd U.S. Congress. Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992. Public Law No. 102-493, 42 USC 263a-1 et seq. Washington, DC.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual ART success rates reports. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/art/ART.htm. Accessed March 23, 2014.
6. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1995 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry Fertil Steril 69 1998 389 398
7. P. Devroey, N. Polyzos, and C. Blockeel An OHSS-free clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment Hum Reprod 26 2011 2593 2597
8. Federal Register: September 1, 2000 (Vol. 65, No. 171). DOCID: FR Doc 00-22425.
9. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1996 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry Fertil Steril 71 1999 798 807
10. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry Fertil Steril 87 2007 1253 1266
11. A. Cabo, N. Garrido, J. Crespo, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer Accumulation of oocytes: A new strategy for managing low-responder patients Reprod Biomed Online 24 2012 424 432
12. K. Scott, K. Hong, and R. Scott Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing Fertil Steril 100 2013 608 614
13. B.S. Shapiro, S.T. Daneshmand, F.C. Garner, M. Aguirre, C. Hudson, and S. Thomas Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: A prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders Fertil Steril 96 2011 344 348
14. Y. Maruta, H. Oku, Y. Morimoto, M. Tokuda, T. Murata, and K. Sugihara et al. Freeze-thaw programmes rescue the implantation of day 6 blastocysts Reprod Biomed Online 11 2005 428 433
15. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). SART CORS. Available at: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR-PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0. html. Accessed May 28, 2014.
16. V.A. Kushnir, A. Vidali, D.H. Barad, and N. Gleicher The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology Fertil Steril 100 2013 736 741
17. D.R. Meldrum Pregnancies and deliveries per fresh cycle are no longer adequate indicators of in vitro fertilization program quality: how should registries adapt? Fertil Steril 100 2013 620 621
18. K. Doody, G.D. Ball, G. Schattman, C. Coddington III, J.P. Toner, and J. Goldfarb Reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology Fertil Steril 100 2013 e25
19. D. Ball, C. Coddington, K. Doody, G. Schattman, J. Toner, and B. Van Voorhis et al. The playing field is changing Fertil Steril 101 2014 e29
20. H.W. Jones Jr., D. Jones, and P. Kolm Cryopreservation: A simplified method of evaluation Hum Reprod 12 1997 548 553
21. R. Steinbrook Public report cards: cardiac surgery and beyond N Engl J Med 355 2006 1847 1849
22. J. Chetkowski Consumer-friendly reporting of in vitro fertilization outcomes Fertil Steril 101 2014 e7