Weighted majority decision among several region rules for scientific discovery

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1721, Issue , 1999, Pages 17-29

  Nakaya, Akihiro ^a   Furukawa, Hideharu ^a   Morishita, Shinichi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; FORESTRY;

CATEGORICAL ATTRIBUTES; CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; EMPIRICAL TEST; NUMERICAL ATTRIBUTES; PREDICTION TOOLS; REGION-SPLITTING; SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY;

DECISION TREES;

EID: 84957811279     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46846-3_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. E. Bauer and R. Kohavi, An Empirical Comparison of Voting Classification Algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, and Variants, Machine Learning (to appear).
2. L. Breiman (1994), Bagging Predictors, Technical Report 421, University of California at Berkeley.
3. L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone (1984), Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth.
4. M. Chikamune (1999), Data Mining Using Weighted Classification Rules (in Japanese), Master thesis of Department of Informatics, Kyushu University, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.
5. Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire (1995), A Decision-Theoretic Generation of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting, In Proc. of the 2nd European Conference on Computational Learning Theory (Euro-COLT’95), pp.23-37.
6. Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire (1996), Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm, Machine Learning: Proc. of the 13th Int’l Conference, pp.148-156.
7. T. Fukuda, Y. Morimoto, S. Morishita, and T. Tokuyama (1996), Constructing Efficient Decision Trees by Using Optimized Numeric Association Rules, In Proc. of the 22nd Int’l Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’96), pp.146-155.
8. Y. Morimoto, T. Fukuda, S. Morishita, and T. Tokuyama (1997), Implementation and Evaluation of Decision Trees with Range and Region Splitting, Constraints 2, pp.401-427.
9. P. M. Murphy and D. W. Aha (1994), UCI Repository of Machine Learning Database, University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science.
10. A. Nakaya and S. Morishita (1999), Weighted Majority Decision among Region Rules for Categorical Dataset. In Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Conference on Discovery Science (to appear).
11. J. R. Quinlan (1993), C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann.
12. J. R. Quinlan (1996), Bagging, Boosting and C4.5, In Proc. of the 13th American Association for Artificial Intelligence National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.725-730, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.
13. Rulequest Research (1999), See5/C5.0, http://www.rulequest.com/.
14. R. E. Schapire, Y. Freund, P. Bartlett, and W. S. Lee (1998), Boosting the Margin: a New Explanation for the Effectiveness of Voting Methods. Annals of Statistics, 26, pp.1651-1686.
15. R. E. Schapire (1999), Theoretical Views of Boosting, In Proc. of the 4th European Conference on Computational Learning Theory (Euro-COLT’99), pp.1-10.
16. K. Yoda, T. Fukuda, Y. Morimoto, S. Morishita, and T. Tokuyama (1997), Computing Optimized Rectilinear Regions for Association Rules, In Proc. of the 3rd Int’l Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’97), pp.96-103.