REDD+ at a Critical Juncture: Assessing the Limits of Polycentric Governance for Achieving Climate Change Mitigation

International Forestry Review

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 400-413

  Sunderlin, W D ^a   Sills, E O ^b   Duchelle, A E ^c   Ekaputri, A D ^d   Kweka, D ^e   Toniolo, M A ^f   Ball, S ^g   Doggart, N ^h   Pratama, C D ^a   Padilla, J T ⁱ   Enright, A ^j   Otsyina, R M ^k  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Center for International Forestry Research   (Brazil)

^d INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES   (Indonesia)

^e Center for International Forestry Research   (Tanzania)

^f INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO   (Brazil)

^g Mpingo Conservation and Development Initiative   (Tanzania)

^h Tanzania Forest Conservation Group   (Tanzania)

ⁱ Ministerio del Ambiente   (Peru)

^j Climate Change Policy and Programs Group   (Australia)

^k TaTEDO   (Tanzania)

more..

Author keywords

climate; deforestation; finance; governance; REDD+

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DEFORESTATION; EMISSION CONTROL; FINANCE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; MITIGATION;

COPENHAGEN [(CTY) HOVEDSTADEN]; DENMARK; HOVEDSTADEN;

EID: 84957803377     PISSN: 14655489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1505/146554815817476468     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ANDONOVA, L.B., BETSILL, M.M. and BULKELEY, H. 2009. Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics 9(2): 52-73.
2. ANGELSEN, A. 2013. REDD+ as performance-based aid: general lessons and bilateral agreements of Norway. WIDER Working Paper No. 2013/135. UNU-WIDER.
3. ANGELSEN, A., BROCKHAUS, M., SUNDERLIN, W.D. and VERCHOT, L.V. (eds.). 2012. Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. 426 pp.
4. ANGELSEN, A., with BROCKHAUS, M., KANNINEN, M., SILLS, E., SUNDERLIN, W.D. and WERTZ-KANOUNNIKOFF, S. (eds.). 2009. Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. 362 pp.
5. ASSUNÇÃO, J., GANDOUR, C.G. and ROCHA, R. 2012. Deforestation slowdown in the Legal Amazon: prices or policies. Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) Working Paper. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil: Pontífica Universidade Católica (PUC).
6. BELENKY, M. 2015. Paris Analysis: mind the gap. Climate Advisers. http://www.climateadvisers.com/mindthegap/
7. BÖRNER, J., WUNDER, S., WERTZ-KANOUNNIKOFF, S., HYMAN, G. and NASCIMENTO, N. 2014. Forest law enforcement in the Brazilian amazon: costs and welfare effects. Global Environmental Change 29: 294-305.
8. BOYD, W. 2011. Climate change, fragmentation, and the challenges of global environmental law: elements of a post-Copenhagen assemblage. Working Paper 11-01. Boulder, Colorado: Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series.
9. BRANDON, K. and WELLS, M. 2009. Lessons for REDD+ from protected areas and integrated conservation and development projects. In: ANGELSEN, A., with BROCKHAUS, M., KANNINEN, M., SILLS, E., SUNDERLIN, W.D., and WERTZ-KANOUNNIKOFF, S. (eds.) Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. 362 pp.
10. BROOKS, J.S., FRANZEN, MA.A, HOLMES, C.M., GROTE, M.N. and MULDER, M.B. 2006. Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 20(5): 1528-1538.
11. [CICERO] Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo. 2014. Effective climate agreement not likely. http://www.cicero.uio.no/webnews/index-e.aspx?id=12046
12. COLE, D.H. 2011. From global to polycentric climate governance. Climate Law 2(3): 395-413.
13. COLE, D.H. 2015. Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change 5: 114-118.
14. CERBU, G. A., SWALLOW, B. M., and THOMPSON, D. Y. 2011. Locating REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science & Policy 14(2): 168-180.
15. CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL. 2013. REDD+ market: sending out an SOS. Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
16. DUCHELLE, A.E., CROMBERG, M., GEBARA, M.F., GUERRA, R., MELO, T., LARSON, A., CRONKLETON, P., BÖRNER, J., SILLS, E., WUNDER, S., BAUCH, S., MAY, P., SELAYA, G. and SUNDERLIN, W.D. 2014. Linking forest tenure reform, environmental compliance, and incentives: lessons from REDD+ initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development 55: 53-57.
17. ESTY, D.C. and MOFFA, A.L.I. 2012. Why climate change collective action has failed and what needs to be done with and without the trade regime. Journal of International Economic Law 15(3): 777-791.
18. GARNETT, S.T., SAYER, J.A., and DU TOIT, J. 2007. Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: a conceptual framework. Ecology and Society 12(1): 2.
19. [GCF] Green Climate Fund. 2015. Status of pledges and contributions made to the Green Climate Fund. [www document]. URL http://news.gcfund.org/wp-content/ uploads/2015/04/GCF-contributions-2015-may-08.pdf
20. GOLDIN, I. 2013. Divided Nations: Why global governance is failing and what we can do about it. Oxford University Press.
21. IFF. 2014. Stimulating interim demand for REDD+ emission reductions: the need for a strategic intervention from 2015 to 2020. Oxford, UK: International Forest Finance Project.
22. [INPE] Instituto Nacionais de Pesquisas Especiais. 2014. INPE divulga resultado final do PRODES 2013. Brasil: Instituto Nacionais de Pesquisas Especiais. [www document]. URL http://www.inpe.br/noticias/noticia.php?Cod-Noticia=3701
23. [IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Chapter 11 on Agriculture, forestry, and other land use. [www document]. URL http://report.mitigation2014.org/drafts/final-draft-postplenary/ipcc-wg3-ar5-final-draft- postplenary-chapter11.pdf
24. JAGGER, P., SILLS, E.O., LAWLOR, K. and SUNDERLIN, W.D. 2011. A Guide to learning about livelihood impacts of REDD+. Occasional Paper No. 56. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
25. MOREL, R., DEHEZA, M., COCHRAN, I., and LEGUET, B. 2014. COP 20 in Lima: a tense rehearsal dinner where everyone ended up eating at the same table. Climate Brief No. 37. CDC Climat. http://www.cdcclimat.com/IMG// pdf/14-12-19-climate-brief-no-37-cop-lima-2.pdf
26. MORRIS, D.F. and STEVENS, A. 2011. REDD+ and international climate finance: A brief primer. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. http://www.rff.org/RFF/ Documents/RFF-IB-11-13%20%28Rev%29.pdf
27. NEPSTAD, D., MCGRATH, D., SHIMADA, J. and STICKLER, C. 2013. Why is Amazon deforestation climbing? Mongabay. [www document]. URL http://news.mongabay.com/2013/1116-nepstad-why-is-deforestationclimbing.html
28. NORMAN, M. and NAKHOODA, S. 2014. The state of REDD+ finance. CGD Working Paper 378. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
29. OSTROM, E. 2009. A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Washington DC: The World Bank.
30. OSTROM, E. 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 20: 550-557.
31. PETERS-STANLEY, M., GONZALEZ, G. and YIN, D., with GOLDSTEIN, A. and HAMRICK, K. 2013. Covering new ground: state of the forest carbon markets 2013. Washington DC: Forest Trends' Ecosystem Marketplace.
32. ROMIJN, E., HEROLD, M., KOOISTRA, L., MURDIYARSO, D. and VERCHOT, L. 2012. Assessing capacities of non-Annex I countries for national forest monitoring in the context of REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy 19-20: 33-48.
33. SILLS, E.O., ATMADJA, S.S., DE SASSI, C., DUCHELLE, A.E., KWEKA, D.L., RESOSUDARMO, I.A.P., and SUNDERLIN, W.D. (eds.). 2014. REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. 505 pp.
34. SIMONET, G., KARSENTY, A., DE PERTHUIS, C., NEWTON, P., and SCHAAP, B. 2014. REDD+ projects in 2014: An overview based on a new database and typology. Information and Debate Series No. 32. Paris-Dauphine University, Climate Economics Chair, Paris, France.
35. SOVACOOL, B.K. 2011. An international comparison of four polycentric approaches to climate and energy governance. Energy Policy 39: 3832-3844.
36. STERN, N. 2006. The Stern review: the economics of climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. STOLLE, F. and ALISJAHBANA, A. 2013. Warsaw climate meeting makes progress on forests, REDD+. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.
38. SWETTE, B., SETIAWAN, J. and NEPSTAD, D.C. 2014. What could the GCF contribute to climate change mitigation by 2020? A preliminary assessment. Earth Innovation Institute.
39. SUNDERLIN, W.D., PRATAMA, C.D., BOS, A.B., AVITABILE, V., SILLS, E.O., DE SASSI, C., JOSEPH, S., AGUSTAVIA, M., PRIBADI, U.A. and ANANDADAS, A. 2014a. REDD+ on the ground: The need for scientific evidence. In: SILLS, E.O., ATMADJA, S.S., DE SASSI, C., DUCHELLE, A.E., KWEKA, D.L., RESOSUDARMO, I.A.P., and SUNDERLIN, W.D. (eds.) REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. pp. 2-32.
40. SUNDERLIN, W.D., LARSON, A.M., DUCHELLE, A.E., RESOSUDARMO, I.A.P., HUYNH, T.B., AWONO, A. and DOKKEN, T. 2014b. How are REDD+ propo nents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. World Development 55: 37-52.
41. SUNDERLIN, W.D., EKAPUTRI, A.E., SILLS, E.O., DUCHELLE, A.E., KWEKA, D.L., DIPROSE, R., DOGGART, N., BALL, S., LIMA, R., ENRIGHT, A., TORRES, J., HARTANTO, H., and TONIOLO, A. 2014c. The challenge of establishing REDD+ on the ground: Insights from 23 subnational initiatives in six countries. Occasional Paper 104. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. 44 pp.
42. WELLS, M., GUGGENHEIM, S., KHAN, A., WARDOJO, W. and JEPSON, P. 1999. Investing in biodiversity: a review of Indonesia integrated conservation and development projects. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. 136 pp.