Innovation in energy technology: Comparing national innovation systems at the sectoral level

Innovation in Energy Technology: Comparing National Innovation Systems at the Sectoral Level

Volumn 9789264014084, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-326

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957777748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1787/9789264014084-en     Document Type: Book

References (141)

1. European Commission (2003), Hydrogen Economy and Fuel Cells: A Vision of Our Future, report prepared on behalf of the High-Level Group on Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies.
2. Fuel Cells Canada and PricewaterhouseCoopers (2002), Fuel Cells: The Opportunity for Canada, June.
3. Industry Canada et al. (2003), Canadian Fuel Cells: Commercialization Roadmap, Ottawa
4. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2004), World Energy Outlook 2004, Paris.
5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2000), Special Report on Emission Scenarios, United Nations, New York.
6. IPTS (2003), Fuel Cells: Impact and Consequences of Fuel Cells on Sustainable Development, Seville.
7. National Academy of Sciences (2001), Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
8. National Academy of Sciences (2004), The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
9. National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) (2003), Latest Industry Statistics, available at www.ncva.org.
10. OECD (2001a), "Mapping the Knowledge Base of Specific Technological Fields or Sectors: A Bibliometric Approach", internal working document.
11. OECD (2004), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2004, Paris.
12. United States Department of Energy (USDOE) (2002), National Hydrogen Energy Roadmap, Washington DC.
13. Avadikyan, A., P. Cohendet and J.A. Héraud, (eds.) (2003), "Introduction", The Economic Dynamics of Fuel Cell Technologies, Springer.
14. Ballay, R. (2003), "Impacts and Experience Learnt from Public Policy Support to Fuel Cell Technology Development: The Case of the French Fuel Cell Research and Innovation Network", Communication to 2003 EHEC Conference, Grenoble, 4 September.
15. Bourgeois, B. and S. Mima (2003), "Rationales for Co-operation between Firms and States within an Emerging Radical Innovation, Chapter 3, pp.79-114, in A. Avadikyan, P. Cohendet and J.A. Héraud (eds.) (2003), The Economic Dynamics of Fuel Cell Technologies, Springer.
16. Clement, D. (2004), Interview with C. Michaut, "L'hydrogène, miroir aux alouettes?" Environnement Magazine, March, pp.20-23.
17. Christensen, C.M. (1997), The Innovator's Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
18. Fri, R.W. (2003), "The Role of Knowledge: Technological Innovation in the Energy System", The Energy Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 51-74.
19. Fauvarque, J.F. (2003), "Avancées technologiques générées par le réseau PACo, Evaluation du réseau PACo, Séminaire Annuel 2003 du Réseau PACo", presentation at Alpexpo, Grenoble, 2 September.
20. Hassan, E. (2003), "Mapping the Knowledge Base of a Technical Field: The Case of Fuel Cells Technology", OECD, draft document.
21. Malerba, F. (2002), "Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production", Research Policy, 31, pp.247-264.
22. Minefi, DIGITIP (2001), Technologies clés 2005, 1 March.
23. National Research Council, National Academy of Engineering (2004), The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers and R&D Needs, The National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
24. OCDE/Ministère de la Recherche et Ministère de l'Economie (2003), "Les partenariats publics-privés pour l'innovation: Analyse comparative internationale France, Autriche, Pays-Bas, Australie - Etude de 7 réseaux de Recherche et d'Innovation Technologique en France", mimeo, April.
25. Seymour, R. (Johnson Matthey) (2004), "Fuel Cell Market Survey: Patents, A Rich Vein of Knowledge, Fuel Cell Today, 27 February.
26. Spinner, B. (2003), "Evolution du Programme Energie", November, www.imp.cnrs.fr/energie/
27. Agency of Natural Resources and Energy, METI (2002), "Commercialisation and Wide Use of Fuel Cells - Toward Hydrogen-based Energy Systems" (in Japanese; English translation appears as "Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Energy").
28. Agency of Natural Resources and Energy, METI (2002), "On the Fuel Cell Demonstration Test Programme" (in Japanese).
29. Fuel Cell Assessment and Advisory Committee for the Prime Minister of Japan and his Cabinet (2001, 2002), "Annual Assessment Report: Ground Work Project for Diffusion of Fuel Cells: The Millennium Project" (in Japanese).
30. Fuel Cell Commercialisation Conference of Japan (2001), "Toward Commercialisation and Wide Use of Fuel Cells" (in Japanese).
31. Fuel Cell Commercialisation Strategy Study Group (2001), "Report of the Fuel Cell Commercialisation Strategy Study Group" (in Japanese).
32. Fuel Cell Commercialisation Strategy Study Group (2001), "Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Technology Development Strategy" (in Japanese).
33. Fuel Cell Project Team of Senior Vice-Ministers (2002), "Fuel Cell Project Team Report" (in Japanese).
34. The Institute of Applied Energy (2001), "Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells" (in Japanese).
35. METI (2000, 2001, 2002), Outline of Annual Budget (in Japanese).
36. NEDO (1981-2002), Annual Reports (in Japanese).
37. NEDO (2000). "The Outline of Research and Development of PEFC Technologies" (in Japanese).
38. OECD (2004). "Innovation in Fuel Cells: A Bibliometric Analysis".
39. Chesbrough, H.W. and D.J. Teece (1996). "When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation", Harvard Business Review, January-February, 65-73.
40. Gilbertand, J.T. and P.H. Bormbaum-More (1996). "Innovation Timing Advantages: From Economic Theory to Strategic Application", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 12, 245-266.
41. Godoe, H. (2000). "Innovation Regimes, R&D and Radical Innovations in Telecommunications", Research Policy, 29, 1003-1046.
42. Godø, H., L. Nerdrum, A. Rapmund and S. Nygaard (2003). "Innovations in Fuel Cells and Related Hydrogen Technology in Norway - OECD Case Study in the Energy Sector", NIFU skriftserienr 35/2003, Oslo.
43. Hassan, E. (2003). "Mapping the Knowledge Base of a Technological Field: The Case of Fuel Cell Technology", draft report for the OECD TIP Focus Group on Energy Technology.
44. Kvamsdal, H.M. and Ø. Ulleberg, (2000). Hydrogensamfunnet - en nasjonal mulighetsstudie (No. A5107). Trondheim: SINTEF.
45. National Academy of Sciences (2001). Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? - Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research, 1978-2000. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
46. Nerdrum, L. and H. Godø (2003). "Mapping Norwegian RD&D in Fuel Cells and Related Hydrogen Technology in an Innovation Policy Perspective", No. U-notat 20/2003. Oslo: NIFU.
47. NIFU (2003), Science and Technology Indicators - 2003 Norway, NIFU, June.
48. Nygaard, S. (2003). "Innovation in Fuel Cells and Related Hydrogen Technology in Norway: Patents and Knowledge Interactions in a System of Innovation", unpublished MA, University of Oslo.
49. OECD (2002a). Dynamising National Innovation Systems.
50. OECD (2002b). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2002.
51. Rapmund, A. and S. Nygaard (2003). "Bibliometric and Patent Analysis of Norwegian Research on Fuel Cells, 1990-2002", No. U-notat 19/2003). Oslo: NIFU.
52. Acha, V. (2000), "The Role of Technological Capabilities in Determining Performance: The Case of the Upstream Petroleum Industry", paper presented at the DRUID Winter Conference, Hillerød, 6-8 January.
53. Acha, V. and L. Cusmano (2001), "Sharing Capabilities: Patterns of R&D Co-operation in the Upstream Petroleum Industry", paper presented at the Future of Innovation Studies conference, Eindhoven, 20-23 September.
54. Acha, V. and J. Finch (2003), "Paths to Deep Water in the International Petroleum Industry", paper presented at the DRUID 2003 Summer Conference, Copenhagen, 12-14 June.
55. Askevold, E.O., T. Laudal, J.M. Steineke and T. Halvorsen (2003). "Norske forskningsparker: mot en bedre organisert nyskaping?" Report RF-2003/169, Rogaland Research, Stavanger.
56. Bloch, H. and J. Voola (2002), "Strategic Interactions and Industry Dynamics: A Case Study of the Effects of Advanced Upstream Seismic Technologies in the Petroleum Industry", paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference, Copenhagen, 6-8 June.
57. Bohi, D.R. (1998), "Changing Productivity in US Petroleum Exploration and Development", Discussion paper 98-38, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
58. Bourgeois, B. and V. Jacquier-Roux (2001), "L'internationalisation des activités technologiques dans les industries énergétiques", IEPE Report, Grenoble.
59. BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2003), June.
60. Braadland, T.E. (1998), "Knowledge Bases in the Offshore Sector", mimeo, STEP Group, Oslo.
61. Cohen, W.M., R.R. Cohen and J.P. Walsh (2000), "Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)", NBER Working Paper no. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.
62. Criscuolo, P., R. Narula and B. Verspagen (2002), "The Relative Importance of Home and Host Innovation Systems in the Internationalization of MNE R&D: A Patent Citation Analysis", ECIS Working Paper no. 02.20, Department of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of Technology.
63. Cumbers, A., D. MacKinnon and K. Chapman (2003), "Innovation, Collaboration, and Learning in Regional Clusters: A Study of SMEs in the Aberdeen Oil Complex, Environment and Planning (A) 35.9, 1689-1706.
64. Creusen, H. and B. Minne (2000), "Falling R&D but Stable Investments in Oil Companies: Why?", CPB Research Memo no. 164, Central Planbureau, The Hague, April.
65. Ekeland, A. and M. Tomlinson (2001), "The Supply and Demand of High Technology Skills in the United Kingdom, Norway and the Netherlands", report from the European Science and Technology Observatory (ESTO), Seville, October.
66. Fossum, A. et al. (2003), "Kartlegging av olje- og gassnæringens betydning for norske regioner" [A survey of the regional significance of the Norwegian oil and gas industry], Centre for Value Creation Report, Norwegian School of Management, Oslo.
67. Hauknes, J. and O. Wicken (2003), "Innovation Policy in the Post-War Period", STEP Report no. 01-03, STEP Group, Oslo.
68. Heum, P. et al. (2000), "Internasjonalisering av norsk petrorettet næringsliv" [The internationalisation of Norwegian petroleum-oriented firms], SNF Report 32/2000, Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration (SNF), Bergen.
69. Hinze, S. (2001), "Bibliometric Analysis of Norwegian Research Activities", Background Report no. 2 in the evaluation of the Norwegian Research Council, ISI Fraunhofer, Karlsruhe/NRC, Oslo.
70. Isaksen, A. (2003), "'Lock-in' of Regional Clusters: The Case of Offshore Engineering in the Oslo Region", in Fornal and Brenner (eds), Cooperation, Networks and Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
71. Karlsen, J.E. (ed.) (2000), "VERTEKS: Kontinentalsokkelen - verdiskaper i verdensklasse?", Report RF-2000/217, Rogaland Research, Stavanger.
72. Karlsen, J.E. (ed.) (2002), "Olje- og gassklyngens relaterte virksomheter" [Activities related to the oil and gas cluster], Report RF-2002/001, Rogaland Research, Stavanger.
73. Koch, P.M. and J. Oksanen (eds.) (2003), "GoodNIP - Good Practices in Nordic Innovation Policies", STEP Report 06-03, STEP Group, Oslo.
74. Langinier, C. (2004), "Are Patents Strategic Barriers to Entry?" Forthcoming in Journal of Economics and Business.
75. Norwegian Research Council (var. years), Statictics and Indicators of the Norwegian Research and Innovation System, NRC/NIFU, Oslo.
76. Norwegian Research Council (2001), Offshore 2010 Final report, Norwegian Research Council, Oslo.
77. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (2003), Faktahefte norsk petroleumsvirksomhet 2003 [Facts about the Norwegian oil and gas industry 2003], NPD, Stavanger.
78. Rapmund, A. (2003), "Bibliometric Analysis of Norwegian Petroleum Research 1991-2002", NIFU memorandum U5-2003, Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education, Oslo.
79. Rønneberg, R. (2003), SkatteFUNN Annual Report 2002, Norwegian Research Council, Oslo, April).
80. Sejersted, F. and O.E. Olsen eds. (1997), "Oljevirksomhet som teknologiutviklings-prosjekt" [Upstream oil and gas as a technology development project], Ad Notam, Oslo.
81. Skogli, E. (1998), Offshore Engineering, Consulting and Innovation", STEP Working Paper A-04/98, Studies in Technology, Innovation and Economic Policy (STEP)/SINTEF, Oslo.
82. Steineke, J.M. (1998), "Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Exploring the Economic Performance of Suppliers to the Norwegian Offshore Industry, 1993-1996", Report 122/1998, Rogaland Research, Stavanger.
83. Breakthrough Technologies Institute (2003), "Fuel Cells at the Crossroads", Spring.
84. Department of Energy (DOE) (2003), Hydrogen Posture Plan, 16 May.
85. Fuel Cell Report to Congress, 28 February 2003 (ESECS EE-19-1973).
86. Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan, draft, 3 June 2003.
87. Office of Technology Policy (2003), "Fuel Cell Vehicles: Race to a New Automotive Future", January.
88. Updike, Kelly, & Spellacy, P.C., "State Fuel Cell Programs Quarterly Review", http://www.uks.com/fuel%20cell/pdf/update-vol2.pdf
89. U.S. Fuel Cell Council (2003), "Fuel Cell Power for Mobility", available at www.usfcc.com.
90. Advanced Technology Program (ATP) (2003), Overview of ATP. www.atp.nist.gov/atp/overview.htm
91. Borgwardt, R. (2001), "Platinum, Fuel Cells and Future U.S. Road Transport", Transportation Research Part D: Transport Environ., 6(3):199-207.
92. Carlson, E. J. (2003), "Precious Metal Availability and Cost Analysis for PEMFC Commercialization", presentation made at 2003 Hydrogen and Fuel Merit Review Meeting, Berkeley, California, 19-22 May. www.tiax.biz/aboutus/pdfs/precious-metals-merit-0519-03.pdf
93. The Economist (2001), "The Fuel Cell's Bumpy Ride", 22 March. www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story-id=539756
94. The Economist (2002), "Power Play over Fuel Cells", 14 March. www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story-id=1020687
95. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (1998). "EIA Technology Forecast Updates: Residential and Commercial Building Technologies: Advanced Adoption Case", Washington, DC.
96. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2000), "Household Energy Consumption and Expenditures 1997", www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/recs97-ce/97tblce.html
97. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2003a), "Annual Energy Outlook 2003 with Projections to 2025", Report # DOE/EIA-0383. Washington, DC.
98. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2003b), "Issues in Midterm Analysis and Forecasting 2000", Report # DOE/EIA-0383. Washington, DC.
99. Lovins, A. (2003), Twenty Hydrogen Myths, Snowmass, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Institute. www.rmi.org/images/other/E-20HydrogenMyths.pdf
100. thAnnual U.S. Hydrogen Meeting, Vienna, Virginia, 7-9 April.
101. Nail, J.M., G. Anderson, G. Ceasar and C.J. Hansen (2004), "The Evolution of the PEM Stationary Fuel Cell in the U.S. Innovation System", report prepared for the OECD, available online at www.oecd.org/sti/innovation.
102. National Research Council, Committee on Alternatives and Strategies for Future
103. Hydrogen Production and Use (NRC) (2004), The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
104. Plug Power, Inc. (2001), Form 10-K, filed March 31 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.
105. Plug Power, Inc. (2003a), Form 10-K, filed March 31 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Washington, DC.
106. Plug Power, Inc. (2003b), "Plug Power Introduces First Fuel Cell Product for the Telecommunications Market", press release, 30 June. www.plugpower.com/news/press.cfm?sr=5&yr=2003
107. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2003), "2003 Fuel Cell Industry Survey: A Survey of 2002 Financial Results of North American Public Fuel Cell Companies", http://pwc.com/gx/eng/about/ind/energy/public-fuel-cell-co-survey.pdf
108. Swisher, J.N. (2002), Cleaner Energy, Greener Profits: Fuel Cells as Cost-Effective Distributed Energy Resources. Snowmass, Colorado: The Rocky Mountain Institute. www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid171.php
109. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2002a), National Hydrogen Energy Roadmap, based on the results of the National Hydrogen Energy Roadmap Workshop, 2-3 April, Washington, DC.
110. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2002b), Progress Report for Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program, Washington, DC.
111. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2003), Fuel Cell Report to Congress. House Report 107-234, Washington, DC.
112. Bettelheim, A. (2000), "Utility Deregulation", CQ Researcher 10(1): 3-12.
113. Cooper, M.H. (1999), "The Politics of Energy." CQ Researcher 9(9): 187-206.
114. Constant, E.W. (1980), The Origins of The Turbojet Revolution, Baltimore, Maryland, Johns Hopkins University Press.
115. Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (1988), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter.
116. Dodgson, M. (1991), "Technological Collaboration and Organisational Learning: A Preliminary Review of Some Key Issues". DRC Discussion Paper no.85, Science Policy Research Unit; University of Sussex.
117. Energy Economist(1997), "A Short History of Westinghouse", Energy Economist: 5.
118. Energy Information Administration (1996). Petroleum 1996: Issues and Trends. Washington, DC,
119. Energy Information Administration (2001), U.S. Natural Gas Markets: Recent Trends and Prospects for the Future. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Energy.
120. Energy Policy Act of 1992. 42 USC. 13201.
121. Etzkowitz, H. and M. Gulbrandsen (1999), "Public Entrepreneur: The Trajectory of United Sates Science, Technology and Industrial Policy", Science and Public Policy 26(1): 53-62.
122. Freeman, C. (1994), "Critical Survey: The Economics of Technological Change", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(5), 474-88.
123. Green, K., R. Hull, A. McKeekin and V. Walsh (1999), "The Construction of the Techno-economic: Networks vs. Paradigms", Research Policy (28), 777-792.
124. Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg and R.M. Henderson (1993), "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August.
125. Jaffe, A.B., M.S. Fogarty and B. Banks (1998), "Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of NASA and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation", The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVI (2), 183-205.
126. Narin, F. (1993), "Technology Indicators and Corporate Strategy", Review of Business, 14(3), 19.
127. National Academy of Science, National Research Council (2001), Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research 1978 to 2000, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
128. Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Bellknap Press.
129. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company - How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York, Oxford University Press.
130. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002), Dynamising National Innovation Systems, Paris, OECD.
131. Prahalad, C.K. and G. Hamel (1990), "The Core Competence of the Corporation," Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79-91.
132. Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
133. Rosenberg, N. (1994), Inside the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History, New York, Cambridge University Press.
134. Rycroft, R.W. and D.E. Kash (1999), The Complexity Challenge - Technological Innovation for the 21st Century, London, Pinter.
135. Senge, Peter M., (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York, Doubleday.
136. Senker, J. and W. Faulkner (1996), Networks, Tacit Knowledge and Innovation. Technological Collaboration - The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation, R. Coombs, A. Richards, P.P. Saviotti and V. Walsh, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.
137. Slater, R. (1993), The New GE - How Jack Welch Revived and American Institution. Homewood, Illinois, Business One Irwin.
138. Teece, D. and G. Pisano (1998), The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction. Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness, G. Dosi, D. J. Teece and J. Chytry. New York, Oxford University Press.
139. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, (2000), Advanced Turbine Systems - Advancing the Gas Turbine Power Industry, Morgantown, West Virginia.
140. Wheatley, M.J. (1992), Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organization from an Orderly Universe, San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler.
141. Williams, D.R. and L. Good (1994). Guide to the Energy Policy Act of 1992, Lilburn, Georgia, Fairmont Press.