The U.S. government's social cost of carbon estimates after their first two years: Pathways for improvement

Economics

Volumn 6, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Kopp, Robert E ^a   Mignone, Bryan K ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Integrated assessment modeling; Social cost of carbon

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865066003     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18646042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-15     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ackerman, F., Stanton, E., and Bueno, R. (2010). Fat tails, exponents, extreme uncertainty: Simulating catastrophe in DICE. Ecological Economics, 69(8): 1657-1665. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.013. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v69y2010i8p1657-1665.html.
2. Anthoff, D., and Tol, R. (2010). The climate framework for uncertainty, negotiation and distribution (FUND), technical description, version 3.5. Discussion paper. URL http://www.fund-model.org/.
3. Anthoff, D., Tol, R., and Yohe, G. (2009). Risk aversion, time preference, and the social cost of carbon. Environmental Research Letters, 4(2): 024002. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024002. URL http://ideas.repec.org/p/esr/wpaper/wp252.html.
4. Archer, D., Eby, M., Brovkin, V., Ridgwell, A., Cao, L., Mikolajewicz, U., Caldeira, K., Matsumoto, K., Munhoven, G., Montenegro, A., and Tokos, K. (2009). Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 37(1): 117-134. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100206.
5. Atkinson, G., Dietz, S., Helgeson, J., Hepburn, C., and Sælen, H. (2009). Siblings, not triplets: Social preferences for risk, inequality and time in discounting climate change. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 3: 2009-26. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2009-26. URL http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2009-26.
6. Azar, C., and Lindgren, K. (2003). Catastrophic events and stochastic costbenefit analysis of climate change. Climatic Change, 56(3): 245-255. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021743622080.
7. Baumol, W. (1972). On taxation and the control of externalities. American Economic Review, 62(3): 307-322. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v62y1972i3p307-22.html.
8. Calvin, K., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Kyle, P., Luckow, P., Thomson, A., and Wise, M. (in rev.). Climate impacts in GCAM: mitigation, adaptation and agriculture. Climatic Change.
9. Clarke, L.(2009).Overview of EMF22international scenarios. URL http://emf.stanford.edu/events/emf_briefing_on_climate_policy_scenarios_us_domestic_and_international_policy_architectures/.
10. Clarke, L. (2010). Representation of climate impacts in GCAM. In Improving the assessment and valuation of climate change impacts for policy and regulatory analysis: modeling climate change impacts and associated economic damages. U.S. Environmental Protection Agncy and U.S. Department of Energy. URL http://go.usa.gov/rMO.
11. Cooke, R. M. (in rev.). Uncertainty analysis comes to integrated assessment models for climate change... and conversely. Climatic Change.
12. Crost, B., and Traeger, C. (2011). Risk and aversion in the integrated assessment of climate change. CUDARE Working Paper 1104R. URL http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1562s275.
13. Dell, M., Jones, B., and Olken, B. A. (2009). Temperature and income: Reconciling new cross-sectional and panel estimates. American Economic Review, 99(2): 198-204. DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.2.198.
14. Dietz, S. (2011). High impact, low probability? An empirical analysis of risk in the economics of climate change. Climatic Change, 108: 519-541. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-9993-4.
15. Epstein, P., Buonocore, J. J., Eckerle, K., Hendryx, M., Stout III, B., Heinberg, R., Clapp, R., May, B., Reinhart, N., Ahern, M., Doshi, S., and Glustrom, L. (2011). Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219(1): 73-98. DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05890.x.
16. Fedorov, A., Dekens, P., McCarthy, M., Ravelo, A., deMenocal, P., Barreiro, M., Pacanowski, R., and Philander, S. (2006). The Pliocene paradox (Mechanisms for a permanent El Niño). Science, 312(5779): 1485-1489. DOI: 10.1126/sci-ence.1122666.
17. Hegerl, G. C., Zwiers, F. W., Braconnot, P., Gillett, N. P., Luo, Y., Marengo Orsini, J. A., Nicholls, N., Penner, J. E., and Stott, P. A. (2007). Understanding and attributing climate change. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. URL http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch9.html.
18. Hof, A., Hope, C., Lowe, J., Mastrandrea, M., Meinshausen, M., and Vuuren, D. (2011). The benefits of climate change mitigation in integrated assessment models: the role of the carbon cycle and climate component. Climatic Change. DOI; 10.1007/s10584-011-0363-7.
19. Hope, C. (2006). The marginal impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: An integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC's five reasons for concern. Integrated Assessment, 6(1): 19-56. URL http://journals.sfu.ca/int_assess/index.php/iaj/article/viewArticle/227.
20. Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Carbon, U. S. G. (2010). Appendix 15a. Social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under Executive Order 12866. In Final Rule Technical Support Document (TSD): Energy Ef ficiency Program for Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Small Electric Motors. U.S. Department of Energy. URL http://go.usa.gov/3fH.
21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000). Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. URL http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.php?idp=0.
22. Kaplow, L., Moyer, E., and Weisbach, D. (2010). The social evaluation of intergenerational policies and its application to integrated assessment models of climate change. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10(2). DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2519.
23. Kaufman, N. (2011). The bias of integrated assessment models that ignore climate catastrophes. Climatic Change. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0140-7.
24. Keller, K., Hall, M., Kim, S.-R., Bradford, D., and Oppenheimer, M. (2005). Avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Climatic Change, 73(3): 227-238. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-005-0426-8.
25. Kopp, R., Golub, A., Keohane, N., and Onda, C. (2012). The influence of the specification of climate change damages on the social cost of carbon. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 6: 2012-13. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-13. URL http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2012-13.
26. Kopp, R., Simons, F., Mitrovica, J., Maloof, A., and Oppenheimer, M. (2009). Probabilistic assessment of sea level during the last interglacial stage. Nature, 462(7275): 863-867. DOI: 10.1038/nature08686.
27. Kousky, C., Kopp, R., and Cooke, R. (2011). Risk premia and the social cost of carbon: a review. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 5: 2011-21. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2011-21. URL http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2011-21.
28. Kriegler, E., Hall, J., Held, H., Dawson, R., and Schellnhuber, H. (2009). Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system. Pro ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(13):5041-5046. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809117106.
29. Kriegler, E., O'Neill, B., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Lempert, R., Moss, R., and Wilbanks, T.(2010).Socio-economic scenario development for climate change analysis. URL http://www.ipcc-wg3.de/meetings/expert-meetings-and-workshops/WoSES.
30. Lempert, R., and Collins, M. (2007). Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Analysis, 27(4): 1009-1026. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00940.x.
31. Lempert, R., Schlesinger, M., Bankes, S., and Andronova, N. (2000). The impacts of climate variability on near-term policy choices and the value of information. Climatic Change, 45(1): 129-161. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005697118423.
32. Lenton, T., Footitt, A., and Dlugolecki, A. (2009). Major tipping points in the earth's climate system and consequences for the insurance sector. World Wildlife Fund and Allianz S E.URL https://www.allianz.com/static-resources/en/press/media/documents/tipping_points.pdf.
33. Lenton, T., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Hall, J., Lucht, W., Rahmstorf, S., and Schellnhuber, H. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6): 1786-1793. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705414105.
34. Lobell, D., Schlenker, W., and Costa-Roberts, J. (2011). Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science, 333(6042): 616-620. DOI: 10.1126/science.1204531.
35. Marten, A. (2011). Transient temperature response modeling in IAMs: The effects of oversimplication on the SCC. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, pages 2011-18. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2011-18. URL http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2011-18.
36. Masur, J., and Posner, E. (2011). Climate regulation and the limits of cost-benefit analysis. California Law Review, 99: 1557-1600. URL http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1662147.
37. McInerney, D., Lempert, R., and Keller, K. (2012). What are robust strategies in the face of uncertain climate threshold responses? Climatic Change. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0377-1.
38. Meinshausen, M., Raper, S., and Wigley, T. (2011). Emulating coupled atmosphereocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11(4): 1417-1456. DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-1417-2011.
39. Monier, E., Scott, J., Sokolov, A., Forest, C., and Schlosser, C. (2011). The MIT IGSM-CAM framework for uncertainty studies in global and regional climate change. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. URL http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AGUFMGC22C.08M.
40. Muller, N., Mendelsohn, R., and Nordhaus, W. (2011). Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. American Economic Review, 101(5): 1649-1675. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.5.1649.
41. Nordhaus, W. (1994). Expert opinion on climatic change. American Scientist, 82(1): 45-51. URL http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=5458592.
42. Nordhaus, W. (2007). Accompanying Notes and Documentation on Development of DICE-2007 Model. URL http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/Accom_Notes_100507.pdf.
43. Nordhaus, W. (2008). A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. URL http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/Balance_2nd_proofs.pdf.
44. Nordhaus, W. (2010). Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(26): 11721-11726. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005985107.
45. Nordhaus, W., and Boyer, J. (2000). Warming the world: Economic models of global warming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
46. O'Neill, B. (2010). Multi-century scenario development and socioeconomic uncertainty. In Improving the Assessment and Valuation of Climate Change Impacts for Policy and Regulatory Analysis: Modeling Climate Change Impacts and Associated Economic Damages. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Depa rtment of Energy.URL http://go.usa.gov/rMO.
47. O'Neill, B., Dalton, M., Fuchs, R., Jiang, L., Pachauri, S., and Zigova, K. (2010). Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(41): 17521-17526. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004581107.
48. Oppenheimer, M., and Petsonk, A. (2005). Article 2 of the UNFCCC: historical origins, recent interpretations. Climatic Change, 73(3): 195-226. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-005-0434-8.
49. Ramsey, F. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152): 543-559. DOI: 10.2307/2224098.
50. Randall, D. A., Wood, R. A., Bony, S., Colman, R., Fichefet, T., Fyfe, J., Kattsov, V., Pitman, A., Shukla, J., Srinivasan, J., Stouffer, R. J., Sumi, A., and Taylor, K. E. (2007). Climate models and their evaluation. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. URL http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch8.html.
51. Reilly, J., Paltsev, S., Stezepek, K., Selin, N. E., Cai, Y., Nam, K.-M., Monier, E., Dutkiewicz, S., Scott, J., Webster, M., and Sokolov, A. (in rev.). Valuing climate impacts in integrated assessment models: the MIT IGSM. Climatic Change.
52. Roe, G. (2010). Knowability and no ability in climate projections. In Improving the Assessment and Valuation of Climate Change Impacts for Policy and Regulatory Analysis: Modeling Climate Change Impacts and Associated Economic Damages. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy. URL http://go.usa.gov/rMO.
53. Sherwood, S., and Huber, M. (2010). An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(21): 9552-9555. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913352107.
54. Sokolov, A., Schlosser, C., Dutkiewicz, S., Paltsev, S., Kicklighter, D., Jacoby, H., Prinn, R., Forest, C., Reilly, J. M., Wang, C., Felzer, B., Sarofim, M., Scott, J., Stone, P., Melillo, J. M., and Cohen, J. (2005). The MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) Version 2: Model description and baseline evaluation. Joint Program Report 124, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. URL http://globalchange.mit.edu/pubs/abstract.php?publication_id=696.
55. Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press.
56. Sterner, T., and Persson, U. (2008). An even Sterner review: Introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(1): 61-76. DOI: 10.1093/reep/rem024.
57. Stott, P., Mitchell, J., Allen, M., Delworth, T., Gregory, J., Meehl, G., and Santer, B. (2006). Observational constraints on past attributable warming and predictions of future global warming. Journal of Climate, 19(13): 3055-3069. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3802.1.
58. Tol, R. (1997). On the optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions: an application of FUND. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2(3): 151-163. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019017529030.
59. Traeger, C. (2009). Recent developments in the intertemporal modeling of uncertainty. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1(1): 261-286. DOI: 10.1146/an-nurev.resource.050708.144242.
60. U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change (2009). Carbon valuation in U.K. policy appraisal: A revised approach. URL http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/what%20we%20do/a%20low%20carbon%20uk/carbon%20valuation/1_20090715105804_e_@@_carbonvaluationinukpolicyappraisal.pdf.
61. United Nations (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. URL http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/background/items/2853.php.
62. United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs (2004). World Population in 2300. ESA/P/WP.187/Rev.1. New York. URL http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/longrange2/2004worldpop2300reportfinalc.pdf.
63. United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs (2011). World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision. ESA/P/WP.220. New York. URL http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Documentation/pdf/WPP2010_Highlights.pdf.
64. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2010). The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. URL http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf.
65. U.S. Department of Energy (2010a). Energy conservation program: Energy conservation standards for small electric motors; Final Rule. Federal Register, 75(45): 10874-10948. URL http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/small_electric_motors.html.
66. U.S. Department of Energy (2010b). Energy conservation program: Energy conservation standards for residential water heaters, direct heating equipment, and pool heaters; Final Rule. Federal Register, 75(73): 20112-20236. URL http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/heating_products_fr.html.
67. U.S. Department of State (2010). U.S. Submission Under the Copenhagen Accord. URL http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_accord/application/pdf/unitedstatescphaccord_app.1.pdf.
68. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2011a). Electric power annual 2009. DOE/EIA-0348(2009). URL http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html.
69. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2011b). Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States 2009. DOE/EIA-0573(2009). URL http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/ghg_report/.
70. van Vuuren, D., Lowe, J., Stehfest, E., Gohar, L., Hof, A., Hope, C., Warren, R., Meinshausen, M., and Plattner, G. (2011). How well do integrated assessment models simulate climate change? Climatic Change, 104(2): 255-285. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9764-2.
71. Warren, R. (2011). The role of interactions in a world implementing adaptation and mitigation solutions to climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1934): 217-241. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0271.
72. Warren, R., Mastrandrea, M., Hope, C., and Hof, A. (2010). Variation in the climatic response to SRES emissions scenarios in integrated assessment models. Climatic Change, 102(3-4): 671-785. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9769-x.
73. Weitzman, M. (2009). On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1162/rest.91.1.1.
74. Weitzman, M. (2010). What is the damages function for global warming - and what difference might it make? Climate Change Economics, 01(01): 57-69. DOI: 10.1142/S2010007810000042.
75. Wing, I. (2010). Sectoral and regional disaggregation and interactions. In Improving the Assessment and Valuation of Climate Change Impacts for Policy and Regulatory Analysis: Modeling Climate Change Impacts and Associated Economic Damages. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy. URL http://go.usa.gov/rMO.
76. Zachos, J., Dickens, G., and Zeebe, R. (2008). An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature, 451(7176): 279-283. DOI: 10.1038/nature06588.