Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination

Andrology

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1088-1093

  Lockwood, G M ^a,b   Deveneau, N E ^a,c   Shridharani, A N ^a,d   Strawn, E Y ^a   Sandlow, J I ^a  

^a FROEDTERT MEMORIAL LUTHERAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Farmington   (United States)

^c University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^d Erlanger Physicians Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Assisted reproductive technology; Intrauterine insemination; Male infertility; Strict sperm morphology; Teratozoospermia

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; CLOMIFENE CITRATE; LETROZOLE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS HEART; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPERM QUALITY; SPERMATOZOON ABNORMALITY; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOMOLOGOUS ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; INFERTILITY, MALE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTOR; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOON; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, MALE; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HOMOLOGOUS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84957426547     PISSN: 20472919     EISSN: 20472927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/andr.12098     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Check JH, Bollendorf A, Wilson C, Summers-Chase D, Horwath D & Yuan W. (2007) A retrospective comparison of pregnancy outcome following conventional oocyte insemination vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection for isolated abnormalities in sperm morphology using strict criteria. J Androl 28, 607-612.
2. Coetzee K, Kruger TF & Lombard CJ. (1998) Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 4, 73-82.
3. Deveneau NE, Sinno O, Krause M, Eastwood D, Sandlow J, Robb P, Granlund A, Strawn EY Jr. (2014) Impact of sperm morphology on the likelihood of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 102, 1584-1590.
4. Franken DR, Menkveld R, Kruger TF, Sekadde-Kigondu C & Lombard C. (2003) Monitoring technologist reading skills in a sperm morphology quality control program. Fertil Steril 79(Suppl 3), 1637-1643.
5. Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF & Schoemaker J. (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 355, 13-18.
6. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, Coutifaris C, Carson SA, Cisneros P, Steinkempf MP, Hill JA, Dong X, Phil M & Vogel DL. (2001) Sperm morphology, motility and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 345, 1388-1393.
7. Hauser R, Yogev L, Botchan A, Lessing JB, Paz G & Yavetz H. (2001) Intrauterine insemination in male factor subfertility: significance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria. Andrologia 33, 13-17.
8. Karabinus DS & Gelety TJ. (1997) The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success. Fertil Steril 67, 536-541.
9. Keegan BR, Barton S, Sanchez X, Berkeley AS, Krey LC & Grifo J. (2007) Isolated teratozoospermia does not affect in vitro fertilization outcome and is not an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 88, 1583-1588.
10. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA & Smith K. (1986) Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 46, 1118-1123.
11. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Veeck LL, Morshedi M & Brugo S. (1987) New method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for human in vitro fertilization. Urology 30, 248-251.
12. Kruger TF, Acosta AA & Simmons KF. (1988) Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 49, 112-117.
13. Lee RK, Hou JW, Ho HY, Hwu YM, Lin MH, Tsai YC & Su JT. (2002) Sperm morphology analysis using strict criteria as a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination. Int J Androl 25, 277-280.
14. Li A, Wang L, Cai J & Huang H. (2006) Correlation of sperm DNA damage with IVF and ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 23, 367-376.
15. Matorras R, Corcostergui B, Perez C, Mandiola M, Mendoza R & Rodriguez-Escudero FJ. (1995) Sperm morphology analysis (strict criteria) in male infertility is not a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination with husband's sperm. Fertil Steril 63, 608-611.
16. McLachlan RI, Baker HW, Clarke GN, Harrison KL, Matson PL, Holden CA, de K DM. (2003) Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice. Pathology 35, 25-33.
17. Menkveld R. (2010) Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Asian J Androl 12, 47-58.
18. Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF & van Zyl JA. (1990) The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 5, 586-592.
19. Menkveld R, Franken DR, Kruger TF, Oehninger S & Hodgen GD. (1991) Sperm selection capacity of the human zona pellucida. Mol Reprod Dev 30, 346-352.
20. Montanaro G, Kruger TF, Coetzee K, Smith K, Van Der Merwe JP & Lombard CJ. (2001) Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme. Andrologia 33, 135-141.
21. Morbeck DE, Leonard PH, Weaver AL, Shimek KM, Bouwsma EV & Coddington CC. (2011) Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications. Fertil Steril 96, 1350-1354.
22. Mortimer D & Menkveld R. (2001) Sperm morphology assessment - historical perspectives and current opinions. J Androl 22, 192-205.
23. Mosher WD & Pratt WF. (1991) Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril 56, 192-193.
24. Nallella KP, Sharma K, Aziz N & Agarwal A. (2006) Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril 85, 629-634.
25. Oehninger S, Acosta AA & Morshedi M. (1988) Corrective measures and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization in patients with severe sperm morphology abnormalities. Fertil Steril 50, 283-287.
26. Ombelet W, Vandeput H, Van de Putte G, Cox A, Janssen M, Jacobs P, Bosmans E, Steeno O & Kruger T. (1997) Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Hum Reprod 12, 1458-1463.
27. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P & Van Steirteghem AC. (1992) Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 340, 17-18.
28. Payne D, Flaherty SP, Jeffrey R, Warnes GM & Matthews CD. (1994) Successful treatment of severe male factor infertility in 100 consecutive cycles using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 9, 2051-2057.
29. Robinson JN, Lockwood GM, Dokras A, Egan DM, Nicholson SC, Ross C & Barlow DH. (1994) Does isolated teratozoospermia affect performance in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer? Hum Reprod 9, 870-874.
30. Shibahara H, Obara H, Ayustawati Hirano Y, Suzuki T, Ohno A, Takamizawa S & Suzuki M. (2004) Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility. Int J Androl 27, 63-68.
31. Spiessens C, Vanderschuren D, Meuleman C & D'Hooghe T. (2003) Isolated teratozoospermia and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 80, 1185-1189.
32. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, Lansac J, Lopes P, Tabaste JM & Spira A. (1991) Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1, 850, 000) of three French regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod 6, 811-816.
33. Tomlinson M, Lewis S, Morroll D, British Fertility Society . (2013) Sperm quality and its relationship to natural and assisted conception: British Fertility Society guidelines for practice. Hum Fertil 16, 175-179.
34. Toner JP, Mossad H, Grow DR, Morshedi M, Swanson RJ & Oehninger S. (1995) Value of sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria for prediction of the outcome of artificial insemination. Andrologia 27, 143-148.
35. Van Waart J, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ & Ombelet W. (2001) Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 7, 495-500.
36. World Health Organization. (1999) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
37. World Health Organization. (2010) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th edn. World Health Organisation Press, Geneva.