Isolated teratozoospermia and intrauterine insemination

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1185-1189

  Spiessens, Carl ^a   Vanderschueren, Dirk ^a   Meuleman, Christel ^a   D'Hooghe, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; Intrauterine insemination; IUI; Male factor infertility; Teratozoospermia

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; CLOMIFENE CITRATE; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; UROFOLLITROPIN;

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BIRTH RATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; OVARY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; TERATOZOOSPERMIA;

EID: 0242577368     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01172-5     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hansen M., Kurinczuk J.J., Bower C., Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 346:2002;725-730.
2. Van Waart J., Kruger T.F., Lombard C.J., Ombelet W. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI) a structured literature review . Hum Reprod Update. 7:2001;495-500.
3. Lindheim S.R., Barad D.H., Zinger M., Witt B., Amin H., Cohen B., et al. Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. J Assisted Reprod Genetics. 13:1996;569-572.
4. Menkveld R., Stander F.S.H., Kotze T.J.v.W, Kruger T.J., Van Zyl J.A. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod. 5:1990;586-592.
5. Ombelet W., Wouters E., Boels L., Cox A., Janssen M., Spiessens C., et al. Sperm morphology assessment diagnostic potential and comparative analysis of strict or WHO criteria in a fertile and a subfertile population . Intern J Androl. 20:1997;367-372.
6. Montanaro-Gauci M., Kruger T.F., Coetzee K., Smith K., Van Der Merwe J.P., Lombard C.J. Stepwise regression analysis on 495 cycles to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an IUI program. Andrologia. 33:2001;135-141.
7. Toner J.P., Mossad H., Grow D.R., Morshedi M., Swanson R.J., Oehninger S. Value of sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria for prediction of the outcome of artificial (intrauterine) insemination. Andrologia. 27:1995;143-148.
8. Ombelet W., Vandeput H., Van de Putte G., Cox A., Janssen M., Jacobs P., et al. Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology . Hum Reprod. 12:1997;1458-1463.
9. Karabinus D.S., Gelety T.J. The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success. Fertil Steril. 67:1997;536-541.
10. Matorras R., Mandiola M., Corcostegui B., Mendoza R., Perez C., Rodriguez-Escudero F.J. Sperm morphology analysis (strict criteria) in male infertility is not a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination with husband's sperm. Fertil Steril. 63:1995;608-611.
11. Keck C., Gerber-Schäfer C., Breckwolt M. Intrauterine insemination as first line treatment of unexplained and male factor infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 79:1998;193-197.
12. Burr R.W., Wang X., Siegberg R., Matthews C.D., Flaherty S.P. The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile sperm inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 65:1996;127-132.
13. Sahakyan M., Harlow B.L., Hornstein M.D. Influence of age, diagnosis and cycle number on pregnancy rates with gonadotrophin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 72:1999;500-504.
14. Tomlinson M.J., Amissah-Arthur J.B., Thomlinson K.A., Kasraie J.L., Bentick B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI) statistical model for IUI success . Hum Reprod. 11:1996;1892-1896.
15. Van der Auwera I., Debrock S., Spiessens C., Afschrift H., Bakelants E., Meuleman C., et al. A prospective randomized study day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer . Hum Reprod. 17:2002;1507-1512.